SillyDog701
You are here: SillyDog701 > News > 2005 May > H.264 vs other codecs comparison

4 May, 2005

MacCentre701, a Mac division of SillyDog701, created a video codec comparison page for some popular video codecs used in today's internet movie delivery (delivery codecs).
A 45 second desktop show was captured uncompressed (312MB).

The same movie is then exported to QuickTime 7's exciting H.264 codec, as well as H.263, Sorenson Video 3, MPEG-4 codecs for comparison. Without a doubt, H.264 is a great codec. You can see the details in this page.

See QuickTime codec comparison page for more detail.

A screenshot of the desktop show was captured.

H.264 is also known as MPEG-4 Part 10. H.263 is the standard by ITC for internet video conferencing, Sorenson Video 3 is a popular codec as it delivered clear picture and reasonable small file size. MPEG-4 is a new standard.

See QuickTime codec comparison page for more detail.

Posted by Antony at May 4, 2005 4:40 PM
>> more May 2005 entries.
Comments

I hear that quik time play swf files not correctly. Is it true?

Posted by: on December 19, 2005 2:17 AM
Post a comment
TypeKey: Due to recent comment spams we encountered, we now require some basic form of authentication before posting your comments. If you have a TypeKey identity, please sign in to use it here.(Don't have a TypeKey account? get one now. It's free)

We apologise for inconvenience.
(Why we need to enable authentication.)

TypeKey is an open and free authentication system, it can be used for a number of sites and TypePad blogs/journals.
Page URL: http://sillydog.org/archives/000663.php
[SillyDog701] [Netscape] [Mozilla] [Switch Guide] [MacCentre701] [SD701 Open Directory]
[Search] [Change Log] [Feedback] [About Us] [Sitemap]
Copyright © 1997 - 2016 Antony Shen. All rights reserved. Copyright Notice. Privacy Statement.
Netscape NOW!Made on a Mac
support SillyDog701