A Netscape ISP. What does this really mean?

Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, Camino, Mozilla, Netscape 6/7/8/9, and all Gecko-based browsers discussion and support forum.
(MozInfo701, Netscape Browser Archive)

Moderators: Antony, Edward, profman, Ramona

A Netscape ISP. What does this really mean?

Postby Fulvio » Wed 10 Dec, 2003 1:28 pm

I got some info. at the Champions forum, which puzzles me. This deals with the new Netscape in Canada.
It was said that it was not based on the gecko engine, and it was a way to get subscribers which loath AOL.
I am puzzled by the requirements.

Included in a Netscape Online membership are:

* Fast dial-up speeds for web browsing and mail acceleration
* Value priced with national coverage @ $18.95/mo. (plus applicable taxes)
* Standards based email with 2 email boxes per subscription and 3 aliases per mailbox
* Unlimited Internet and email usage
* 5 MB of personal web space
* 7 x 24 customer and technical support
* No activation fee

Minimum Requirements are:

*Microsoft® Windows® 95 with Windows Socket 2 Update, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows 2000, Windows XP operating system or later. (Apple® Macintosh® computers are not supported)

*133 MHz Pentium® processor or faster
*Minimum 64 MB of RAM
*An Internet browser: Internet Explorer 5.0+ or Netscape® 5.0+

Does this mean that someone like DJGM could use it?

http://join.netscape.ca/index.php
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, SM2.9.1, FF12, TB12.0.1, IE8.0, Google Chrome18, Ghostwall , Avast 7.x, JRE1.7_04. Testing FF13b3
User avatar
Fulvio
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11914
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 10:08 am

Postby Wellander » Thu 11 Dec, 2003 1:32 am

Hi,
It is in beta testing here in the US.
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0)
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm

re:

Postby wde » Thu 11 Dec, 2003 1:53 am

Wellander wrote:Hi,
It is in beta testing here in the US.


Yep, here is the link:
http://isp.netscape.com/software/index.jsp
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
wde
junior member
junior member
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed 10 Dec, 2003 9:09 pm

Re: A Netscape ISP. What does this really mean?

Postby DJGM » Thu 11 Dec, 2003 4:58 am

Fulvio wrote:Does this mean that someone like DJGM could use it?


Not exactly.

My PC has no dialup modem installed in it (but my iMac does) And as I don't live in Canada, or
anywhere near Canada, it is not geographically possible for me to use it, even if I wanted to!
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031210 Firebird/0.7+
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4572
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK

Postby Antony » Thu 11 Dec, 2003 7:13 am

The Netscape ISP looks pretty, and it costs only $1 per month until March next year.
Image

but...
Image
(not for Mac)
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/85.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/85.5
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14509
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

re:mac

Postby wde » Thu 11 Dec, 2003 8:01 am

Macintosh? We don't need no stinking macintosh. j/k :wink:
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
wde
junior member
junior member
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed 10 Dec, 2003 9:09 pm

Postby Mandrake » Thu 11 Dec, 2003 9:03 am

:lol: Since AOL's goal is to cut costs and boost revenue, it wouldn't suprise me if no version is released for Mac OS.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
User avatar
Mandrake
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4193
Joined: Fri 13 Sep, 2002 6:35 am

Postby Josh » Thu 11 Dec, 2003 4:06 pm

Mandrake wrote::lol: Since AOL's goal is to cut costs and boost revenue, it wouldn't suprise me if no version is released for Mac OS.


Or they could take the shortcut of putting the "netscape" ISP, put it on CD, and bundle Virtual PC with it. I've seen many software companies do.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208
Josh
SD701 Moderator
User of Safari 4.0.3 on :tiger:
User avatar
Josh
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Fri 21 Jun, 2002 11:04 am

Postby Andrew T. » Thu 11 Dec, 2003 4:21 pm

Looking at Antony's "Macintosh Users" screen shot, I wonder what happened to the "Windows 95 with Windows Socket 2 Update" formerly listed in the system requirements.
I'd wish that AOL/Netscape would seriously think of developing a Mac OS version of the ISP, though. Or if it isn't, at least make no pretenses instead of encouraging people to "check back in the future" for that non-existant version for the Macintosh! :o
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
User avatar
Andrew T.
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Fri 14 Mar, 2003 11:37 pm
Location: Somewhere beyond the sea

Postby DJGM » Thu 11 Dec, 2003 6:11 pm

Hmmph, now AOL are just taking the **** !

Image

It's bad enough they're giving precedence to the abysmal "Microshaft Lookout Distress" in their email FAQ for
the Netscape branded "AOL Lite" service, but Netscape Communicator 7.x?!? Don't AOL realise there is tec-
hnically no such thing as Netscape Communicator 7.x? If they want to correctly refer to the e-mail client
built into v7.x of the Netscape internet application suite, then surely it would be better and more
accurate to put "Netscape Mail & Newsgroups 7.x" or just simply "Netscape 7.x" ?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Last edited by DJGM on Thu 11 Dec, 2003 6:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4572
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK

Postby Fulvio » Thu 11 Dec, 2003 6:18 pm

That is why I was asking what it meant. I did not get that page, but it confirms that they are oversimplifying, or are total incompetents.
You know what I lean to.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) (CK-SillyDog)
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, SM2.9.1, FF12, TB12.0.1, IE8.0, Google Chrome18, Ghostwall , Avast 7.x, JRE1.7_04. Testing FF13b3
User avatar
Fulvio
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11914
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 10:08 am

Postby Antony » Thu 11 Dec, 2003 6:18 pm

As an ISP, they should not discriminate users based on their preference of internet software.

Clearly, the ISP or marketing department does not really know about its very own branded Netscape software.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) (CK-SillyDog)
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14509
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby DJGM » Thu 11 Dec, 2003 6:20 pm

Fulvio wrote:. . . or are total incompetents . . .


Well, that is AOL we're referring to, so you're absolutely correct there!
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4572
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK


Return to Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape

Who is online

Registered users: Amrad, Google [Bot]