If my understanding was correct...
Mozilla (Mozilla Application Suite) = Firefox + Thunderbird.
Today, in order to further verify if I am really banned from Netscape's secure newsgroups (secnews), I decided to download the latest Thunderbird and further testing if I can access it and post there.
What's ridiculous?
Mozilla 1.7RC3 is only 14.6MB in file size.
Firefox (0.8) is 9.5MB.
Thunderbird (0.6) has massive file size of 10.6MB.
So if you decided to use Firefox + Thunderbird, you will need to download additional 5.5MB.
And additional 5.5MB can be translated to about 15 minutes for 56k modem users, if the line connection is good.
In the past, I keep having problem accessing secnews. For some times, I can read the messages, but none of my replies were gone through. Hence I concluded that I must be banned.
I've been tested with a number of environment and even with my old Windows machine, which I used to be able to access secnews in the past. However I failed to access to that (both from my new Power Mac and old Windows machine).
Personally, I have not been happy with secnews.
I do realise Netscape's secure newsgroups (secnews) have strong tie with Netscape Champion and Mozilla Champion. It is true that SillyDog701 is affiliated with Netscape Champion and Mozilla Champion, however, SillyDog701 one of the major Netscape/Mozilla supporting websites targeting real average end users. I see no reason why I should be banned.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/125.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.8



