SillyDog701

by **DJGM** » Sat 22 Jun, 2002 8:35 am

For all your browser testing and/or UserAgent showcase, please use UserAgent testing thread
Edited by Antony.

Original message:
Testing with Mozilla Seamonkey Milestone 11!
Although you really cannot currently tell
without the user agent string facility
enabled on this new forum.

by **Guest** » Sat 22 Jun, 2002 2:24 pm

Testing with Netscape 7.0 Preview Release 1 on Windows 98SE.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020512 Netscape/7.0b1

by **Guest** » Sat 22 Jun, 2002 8:11 pm

Testing with Mozilla 1.0.0 on BeOS 5 Personal Edition

Mozilla/5.0 (BeOS; U; BeOS BePC; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530

by **Antony** » Sun 23 Jun, 2002 8:35 am

Do you think that I try to get the UserAgent string listed is useful?

It would take me quite a while to modify the code.

by **Guest** » Sun 23 Jun, 2002 10:13 am

Testing Mozilla 1.0 on Mac OS 9.2.2

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020529

by **Josh** » Sun 23 Jun, 2002 1:28 pm

Website · by **Mega\** » Wed 26 Jun, 2002 7:51 am

Testing with MSIE 3.0 for Win 3.1

by **Antony** » Wed 26 Jun, 2002 9:25 pm

Mega\,

How was this forum looked like under MSIE 3.1 Win 3.1?

by **DJGM** » Fri 28 Jun, 2002 1:29 pm

This should give you an idea of how this forum
looks with MSIE3.03 under Windows 2000 . . .

http://www.djgm.co.uk/stuff/sd701_ie303.png

It doesn't look as bad as I thought that it would.
I still think MSIE3 is a really crap browser though!

by **Antony** » Fri 28 Jun, 2002 5:08 pm

Thanks DJGM,

How do you get MSIE3 installed in Win2k?

by **DJGM** » Fri 28 Jun, 2002 7:10 pm

I downloaded the 16bit version of IE3.0 for Windows NT3.51.
Windows 2000 will not allow the 32bit version of IE3.0 to be
installed, as the pre-installed IE5.5 is really only the IE4.0
codebase with a few added extras and lots more bloat!

by **Antony** » Sat 29 Jun, 2002 9:39 am

Then how do you get Windows 2000 to run Win-16bit application? I thought it is totally unsupported.

Also, isn't WinNT 3.51 a 32-bit environment?

by **DJGM** » Sat 29 Jun, 2002 4:37 pm

The installer does give a warning, but it asks if you wish
to continue with the installation. As for Windows NT3.51,
that was the forerunner to NT4.0, and had an interface
similar to that of Windows 3.1 and 3.11 for Workgroups.
It was therefore an entirely 16bit version of Windows.
Windows NT4.0 was the first 32bit version of WinNT,
and was the first NT release with a Win95 style GUI.

by **Antony** » Sat 29 Jun, 2002 7:29 pm

So Windows NT 3.5.1 looks like Windows 3.1x?

Haven't been used Windows 3.1x since W95 came out.

by **DJGM** » Sun 30 Jun, 2002 4:46 am

Have a look at Windows NT 3.51 here:
http://toastytech.com/guis/nt351.html

Despite what I said before about this
particular version of Windows being
a 16bit OS, according to the article
at the URL above, it's 32bit OS, but
with a Windows 3.x look that makes
it look like a 16bit OS.

Now I'm not entirely sure exactly HOW
many bits make up Windows NT 3.51!
I'll have to look it up on Microsoft's
website, if I can find the time to
trawl through all of it!

SillyDog701

Browser Testing thread . . .

Browser Testing thread . . .

Testing Opera 6.03 on WinXP

Who is online