CDR's lifetime - Worrying News

Our lounge for socialising and for all general topics in good taste. Including all SillyDog701 related issues.

Moderators: Edward, profman, Mandrake

Postby Antony » Thu 06 May, 2004 12:00 am

Storing of those tapes is not as easy when compared to optical media.

You also need to keep the environment with low humidity, and away from magnetic field.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/124 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.1
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14509
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Wellander » Thu 06 May, 2004 12:18 am

Hi,
There are good for backup.
Not very good for accessing bits by bits though.
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 98)
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm

Postby Don_HH2K » Sat 22 May, 2004 3:39 pm

I remember when i still used my old SyQuest SparQ drive. I think the drive itself gave out before the cartridges did.. Of course, that could be because I was backing up by 70mb hard drive to it every few months for about three or four years.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Laptop: HP Compaq nx6325 - Turion 64 X2 @ 2GHz, 2GB DDR2, 100GB HD, ATI Radeon X300, 15" LCD, Seven Pro
Handheld: Palm Treo 650 - Intel PXA270 @ 312MHz, 10MB RAM, 32MB flash, 2.7" LCD, Palm OS 5.4
User avatar
Don_HH2K
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5112
Joined: Sun 09 May, 2004 3:59 pm

Postby 900t » Sun 11 Jul, 2004 3:44 pm

Tape drives are unbearably slow (especially the ones with floppy interfaces)

Floppy disks cannot hold real files anymore (with digital camera images measuring in excess of 800ko for a jpeg, a 1.44mo disk is a little tight)

The CD-rw is the only real viable removable storage right now, and even then it sucks too (isn't so much plug&play, needs to be burnt and such).

Zip disks are about the only real good thing for normal use, but harddisks are so large and cheap nowadays for file storage, and internet connections are so fast e-mail works good for transferring files that removable media is much less required as it once was.

25 years ago was 1980 - there weren't even any PC's running around yet.

I do have 5.25" floppies still running around, but my newer NetVista won't let me install the drive...
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040626 Firefox/0.9.1
User avatar
900t
member
member
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue 10 Jun, 2003 7:07 pm
Location: Montréal, Québec

Postby minion » Fri 13 Aug, 2004 5:21 am

Tape drives are great. I used to use
exabyte 8mm drives a lot, but the
excessive tape transport in the helical
scan design bothers me. So I'd like to
get a DLT drive, but it hasn't happened
yet. (I have a compactape drive, which
is the ancestor to DLT, but at 80 meg /
tape, it's not particularly useful
these days. Ha ha.)
The only data storage medium that's
actually reliable over hundreds of
years (machine readable that is, no
carved granite tablets!) is punched
mylar tape. (Just like paper tape,
but with a sort of metalic tape instead
of paper.) Very low density, but indestructable,
trivial to build readers, and in an
emergency you can read it with the
naked eye.
UserAgent: Lynx/2.8.4rel.1 libwww-FM/2.14 SSL-MM/1.4.1 OpenSSL/0.9.7b
minion
junior member
junior member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri 13 Aug, 2004 3:13 am
Location: Providence

Previous

Return to SillyDog701 Lounge

Who is online

Registered users: Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]

cron