SillyDog701

by **Antony** » Wed 11 Feb, 2004 6:44 pm

I copied out the deleted parts from the US Presidential Election thread. I believe Profman simply want to keep the the thread on topic, not to censor any opinions.

You opinions on anything are welcome, however, no kinds of personal attacks are allowed in SillyDog701.

djv1 wrote:
izanbardprince wrote:John Kerry.

Good man.

Supporter of gay rights and fighting to get our manufacturing jobs back from the 3rd world, and doesn't support Dubya's Texas shooting spree over in the middle east.

IF GOD WANTED PEOPLE TO BE GAY THEY WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ADAM AND EVE, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN ADAM AND STEVE.

Antony wrote:
djv1 wrote:
izanbardprince wrote:John Kerry.

Good man.

Supporter of gay rights and fighting to get our manufacturing jobs back from the 3rd world, and doesn't support Dubya's Texas shooting spree over in the middle east.

IF GOD WANTED PEOPLE TO BE GAY THEY WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ADAM AND EVE, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN ADAM AND STEVE.
Please do not type in all capital case.

This thread is not a "gay right" debate thread. There are people who were born gay. Also let me tell you, if there was a choice, most gays won't choose to get discriminated.
You are free to start a "gay right" or "gay marriage" or "abortion" debate threads.

AdrianLondon wrote:11 Feb, 2004 8:05 am
"IF GOD WANTED PEOPLE TO BE GAY THEY WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ADAM AND EVE, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN ADAM AND STEVE"

*sigh*

If God had created Adam and Steve, then - although the Garden of Eden would be beautifully tendered and maintained, the human race would have died out after around 70 years.

But let's never let informed logic get in the way of a religious rant, eh.

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 4.0; T312461)
_________________
--
THE Adrian

Marcus wrote:11 Feb, 2004 9:05 am
"IF GOD WANTED PEOPLE TO BE GAY THEY WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ADAM AND EVE, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN ADAM AND STEVE"

If you believe in Adam and Eve you believe the World evolved from incest.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8

djv1 wrote:11 Feb, 2004 1:32 pm
Marcus wrote:"IF GOD WANTED PEOPLE TO BE GAY THEY WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ADAM AND EVE, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN ADAM AND STEVE"

If you believe in Adam and Eve you believe the World evolved from incest.

my religion is my choice not yours

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)

Marcus wrote:11 Feb, 2004 2:10 pm
djv1 wrote:"IF GOD WANTED PEOPLE TO BE GAY THEY WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ADAM AND EVE, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN ADAM AND STEVE"

my religion is my choice not yours

Under the same argument by popular representation of the bible god created Adam, a white guy from the middle east, and eve from Adam to serve him. As you've made it clear that you believe Genesis in the literal sense then you must believe that anyone who's not white is an abomination.

See how logic can be skewed to satisfy an argument?

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) (CK-SillyDog)

by **djv1** » Wed 11 Feb, 2004 8:20 pm

i wasn't trying to argue, i was trying to prove a point

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

by **Marcus** » Wed 11 Feb, 2004 8:30 pm

I don't see you having a point to prove other than ignorance.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8

by **djv1** » Wed 11 Feb, 2004 8:32 pm

Speaking of ignorant :twisted:

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

by **Antony** » Wed 11 Feb, 2004 8:33 pm

What are your points, Dustin?

You don't like gays isn't a good point for debating.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) (CK-SillyDog)

by **profman** » Wed 11 Feb, 2004 8:34 pm

Thanks for the move, antony. I appreciate it as I do not wish to censor any opinions.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

by **djv1** » Thu 12 Feb, 2004 12:55 am

I agree with you I have no point. Besides I don't like gays, please lock this thread before I get anymore stupid ideas.

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)

by **Marcus** » Thu 12 Feb, 2004 5:46 am

djv1 wrote:I agree with you I have no point. Besides I don't like gays, please lock this thread before I get anymore stupid ideas.

At least you now accept your ideas are stupid. :wink:

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8

by **djv1** » Thu 12 Feb, 2004 11:56 am

Your really arragent Marcus.

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)

by **Marcus** » Thu 12 Feb, 2004 12:10 pm

djv1 wrote:Your really arragent Marcus.

Read your own postings to define arrogance. At least I can spell the word.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8

by **casarakur9** » Mon 29 Mar, 2004 3:31 pm

There are a lot of problems in the world, wasting time on gays or marriage is a waste of time.Remember no discrimination based of sex, race, etc. The environment, health care, jobs, corporate and government corruption need to be addressed. many countries(men) do not tolerate gays, womens freedom, etc. maybe those who are uncomfortable here in the west should move where god tells them what to do, where everybody is straight and same race.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) (CK-SillyDog)

by **Lorraine** » Thu 01 Apr, 2004 10:11 pm

Two men living in the Province of Quebec, Canada, were the first to be married in a Civil Ceremony today. They have lived together for thirty years and were delighted to be able to tie the knot.

They said they were going south on their honeymoon too, just like some heterosexuals do.

I hope they will be very happy.

It is really strange how:

Homosexuals get married and the heterosexuals just live together now. I expect that in a few years, the Church will realize this and allow homosexuals to marry in Church.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

by **keith** » Thu 01 Apr, 2004 11:22 pm

yeah, like gay, as in happy? get it? hahahahaha happy together being gay?
sorry. had to make that joke.
Why can't gay people get married in a church?
keith.

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98; Win 9x 4.90)

by **johnd** » Tue 06 Apr, 2004 12:35 pm

Hello. Antony, I have seen all the gays rights messages on the website and notice you support them all. Just out of curiosity, without any offense meant, are by any chance a homosexual?

Jake

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.22; Mac_PowerPC)

by **johnd** » Wed 07 Apr, 2004 11:16 am

Marcus wrote:
djv1 wrote:I agree with you I have no point. Besides I don't like gays, please lock this thread before I get anymore stupid ideas.

At least you now accept your ideas are stupid.

The only ideas that are stupid are the ones that come out of your mouth

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.22; Mac_PowerPC)

SillyDog701

Gay issues (from US presidential election thread)

Gay issues (from US presidential election thread)

gay issues

Who is online