I do not think that Netscape 7.2 will be released.

Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, Camino, Mozilla, Netscape 6/7/8/9, and all Gecko-based browsers discussion and support forum.
(MozInfo701, Netscape Browser Archive)

Moderators: Antony, Edward, profman, Ramona

Postby Antony » Mon 12 Jul, 2004 10:10 pm

ChrisI wrote:[...]
Mozilla Champions may be invitation only, but all we do is give user support.
[...]
Hmm, I really doubt that.
Jay Garcia answered it.
Image
(Reference: snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/ccvdcj ... tscape.com )

He said, fooling and teasing other people is also part of Champs duties. Perhaps, I need to warn all SillyDog701 members.


back to "Sillydog701 is the leading website..." issue (in this very same thread)
ChrisI wrote:
Antony wrote:Sadly, "7 Million hits annually" does not apply to SillyDog701, SillyDog701 has more than "7 Million hits" in less than two (2) months.

Isn't SillyDog701 the leading website in terms of supporting Netscape/Mozilla?
As we can see by Fulvio's first post in this discussion, "leading website in terms of supporting Netscape/Mozilla" is interpreted many different ways.
Do you make any question about the UFAQ.org's wording?
Image
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.8
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14509
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Wellander » Mon 12 Jul, 2004 10:19 pm

Hi,
What does this have to do with Me thinking that 7.2 will not be released?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm

Postby Wellander » Mon 12 Jul, 2004 10:20 pm

Do you make any question about the UFAQ.org's wording? It is misleading and not very professional.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm

Postby Antony » Mon 12 Jul, 2004 10:21 pm

Wellander wrote:Hi,
What does this have to do with Me thinking that 7.2 will not be released?
No, but still the unanswered questions that I need to ask ChrisI.

Wellander wrote:Do you make any question about the UFAQ.org's wording? It is misleading and not very professional.
I agree.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.8
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14509
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Wellander » Mon 12 Jul, 2004 10:24 pm

Image is qusetionable then?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm

Postby cuppettcj » Tue 13 Jul, 2004 6:22 am

dluchini30 wrote:After all, when Gecko from Mozilla 1.4 goes the way of the Communicator rendering engine, users of the Netscape Internet service will be left with a browser that doesn't work and a $10USD bill for it every month.


The Netscape Internet Service will work with any browser. It's just an ISP. AOL is simply using the Netscape name (because of name recognition, I suppose) as a way of offering a low-cost alternative to its bloated full-cost service in order to compete with cheaper ISP's, such as NetZero.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
cuppettcj
member
member
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed 03 Sep, 2003 5:30 pm
Location: Linden, VA

Postby Don_HH2K » Tue 13 Jul, 2004 6:23 am

I was under the impression that they were including some sort of dialer with Netscape that would bypass Dial-Up Networking with the Netscape Internet Service. That would seem very AOL-like.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
User avatar
Don_HH2K
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5112
Joined: Sun 09 May, 2004 3:59 pm

Postby cuppettcj » Tue 13 Jul, 2004 7:28 am

dluchini30 wrote:I was under the impression that they were including some sort of dialer with Netscape that would bypass Dial-Up Networking with the Netscape Internet Service. That would seem very AOL-like.


I think it's altogether possible that AOL is looking at its rapidly shrinking customer base and slowly starting to realize it needs to change such behavior if it has hopes of competing with other ISP's in the future. Then again, it could just be wishful thinking on my part.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
cuppettcj
member
member
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed 03 Sep, 2003 5:30 pm
Location: Linden, VA

Postby ChrisI » Tue 13 Jul, 2004 7:42 pm

Antony wrote:
ChrisI wrote:[...]
Mozilla Champions may be invitation only, but all we do is give user support.
[...]
Hmm, I really doubt that.
Jay Garcia answered it.
(Reference)
He said, fooling and teasing other people is also part of Champs duties.
It was a 'tongue in cheek' answer to a silly question. I wouldn't take that question seriously either. Besides, ask any Champ if they've been notified of any such "duty".
Antony wrote:Perhaps, I need to warn all SillyDog701 members.
Sillydog members know better than to believe that.

So, what's with your hostility toward the Champions? Is it because of the April Fools joke? Ever since April 1st, I've had put out flame after flame from you toward the Champs. I don't recall such hostility from you before then. :?

Antony wrote: Do you make any question about the UFAQ.org's wording?
Image
I assume you mean "Do you question the UFAQ's wording?"
Yes, of course I do.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040625 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
Chris I
Please do not send me tech support questions privately.
User avatar
ChrisI
Mozilla Champion
Mozilla Champion
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Thu 12 Jun, 2003 3:41 am
Location: Toronto

Postby Antony » Fri 16 Jul, 2004 1:29 am

ChrisI wrote:So, what's with your hostility toward the Champions? Is it because of the April Fools joke? Ever since April 1st, I've had put out flame after flame from you toward the Champs. I don't recall such hostility from you before then. :?

No hostility towards the Champions at all.
I appreciate Alice's support, regardless her Mozilla Champion title.
Holger only posts very few here, it would be unfair to make comments.

As for the "About SillyDog701" I added in a few selected posts, the no good relationship with Netscape Champions and/or UFAQ.org, it was merely fact . Please ask Jay, when has Netscape Browser Archive or SillyDog701 even been linked in UFAQ.org ?

As for fooling/teasing SillyDog701 members intentionally and/or maliciously , it is an unacceptable behaviour . Perhaps, a small group of people enjoyed it, but NOT majority of SillyDog701 members.
Those small group of people who enjoyed fooling and/or teasing SillyDog701 members around have hence demeaned themselves.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.8
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14509
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Wellander » Fri 16 Jul, 2004 1:42 am

Hi,
Me wellander is upset with Chris I about all of this.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8a2) Gecko/20040714
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm

Postby Fulvio » Fri 16 Jul, 2004 2:50 am

http://www.ufaq.org/modules.php?name=Web_Links
late addition, but surely present.

SillyDog 701
Description: Antony Shen's SillyDog site. Includes Forums, custom versions of Netscape, etc. and especially the Netscape/Communicator Archive where you can find old versions ...
Added on: 11-Mar-2004 Hits: 139
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040707 Seajackalope/0.9.2
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, SM2.9.1, FF12, TB12.0.1, IE8.0, Google Chrome18, Ghostwall , Avast 7.x, JRE1.7_04. Testing FF13b3
User avatar
Fulvio
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11915
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 10:08 am

Postby ChrisI » Fri 16 Jul, 2004 7:52 pm

Antony wrote:No hostility towards the Champions at all.
Maybe it's not intentional. :|

Antony wrote: As for the "About SillyDog701" I added in a few selected posts, the no good relationship with Netscape Champions and/or UFAQ.org, it was merely fact . Please ask Jay, when has Netscape Browser Archive or SillyDog701 even been linked in UFAQ.org ?
Best to ask him yourself. Where are the links to UFAQ.org on Sillydog?

Antony wrote:As for fooling/teasing SillyDog701 members intentionally and/or maliciously , it is an unacceptable behaviour . Perhaps, a small group of people enjoyed it, but NOT majority of SillyDog701 members.
Those small group of people who enjoyed fooling and/or teasing SillyDog701 members around have hence demeaned themselves.
I wish you would be specific with your accusations. :(
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040625 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
Chris I
Please do not send me tech support questions privately.
User avatar
ChrisI
Mozilla Champion
Mozilla Champion
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Thu 12 Jun, 2003 3:41 am
Location: Toronto

Postby Antony » Fri 16 Jul, 2004 8:10 pm

ChrisI wrote:
Antony wrote:No hostility towards the Champions at all.
Maybe it's not intentional. :|
There's no need to have hostility towards the Champions.
Why shall SillyDog701 make unfriendly relationship with other websites or people support Netscape?

ChrisI wrote:
Antony wrote: As for the "About SillyDog701" I added in a few selected posts, the no good relationship with Netscape Champions and/or UFAQ.org, it was merely fact . Please ask Jay, when has Netscape Browser Archive or SillyDog701 even been linked in UFAQ.org ?
Best to ask him yourself. Where are the links to UFAQ.org on Sillydog?
The link to UFAQ.org was there since early days of Netscape Browser Archive, under the Help section. Also can be seen in a number of other Netscape pages, including Netscape Info Centre and more.

I think I need to re-evaluate the inclusion of links.

ChrisI wrote:
Antony wrote:As for fooling/teasing SillyDog701 members intentionally and/or maliciously , it is an unacceptable behaviour . Perhaps, a small group of people enjoyed it, but NOT majority of SillyDog701 members.
Those small group of people who enjoyed fooling and/or teasing SillyDog701 members around have hence demeaned themselves.
I wish you would be specific with your accusations. :(
It is very clear, unless you really want me to call names.

The relationship between SillyDog701 and { UFAQ.org and Netscape's secnews } has never been good. If you still have copied of newsgroup thread before this year, just go back and dig them out. It is not hard to notice that SillyDog701's Netscape Browser Archive and Netscape Streamline were pretty much ignored.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/125.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.8
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14509
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Previous

Return to Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape

Who is online

Registered users: Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]