JayGarcia wrote:You can say whatever you want
If that were true, then I would not have to take a screenshot of every post I make to here.
JayGarcia wrote:You can say whatever you want
and then you sayI repeatedly was removed and you said it was the bot. But I know it wasn't the bot.
Please let me know how many times I have to tell you it was the bot. Now, this doesn't mean that there were others that manually cancelled your posts, but for the record I NEVER manually cancelled ANY of your posts.And you told me it was the bot after I was reinstated Jay
I was always "straight" with you Lorraiine, remember all those private emails??I always thought you were being straight with me
I'll ask her the next time we speak but I don't think I ever mentioned anything like that. What I remember saying in THIS thread is that DrDean was the Dean of the School of Clinical Psychology at a major universtiy in Europe, not France. And I know where Quebec is. DrDean hasn't died yet so she hasn't lived there all her life yet. She was born in Europe somewhere where she spent most of her childhood only to move to Canada with her husband after both retired.I believe you said in the thread somewhere that Dr. Dean was a teacher at a University in France.
JayGarcia wrote:Make up your mind Lorraine, you either believe it was the bot or you don't.and then you sayI repeatedly was removed and you said it was the bot. But I know it wasn't the bot.Please let me know how many times I have to tell you it was the bot. Now, this doesn't mean that there were others that manually cancelled your posts, but for the record I NEVER manually cancelled ANY of your posts.And you told me it was the bot after I was reinstated Jay
And thenI was always "straight" with you Lorraiine, remember all those private emails??I always thought you were being straight with me
I'm also Mickey Mouse, pass the cheese.I think you are probably Dantu as well.
JayGarcia wrote:I'll ask her the next time we speak but I don't think I ever mentioned anything like that. What I remember saying in THIS thread is that DrDean was the Dean of the School of Clinical Psychology at a major universtiy in Europe, not France. And I know where Quebec is. DrDean hasn't died yet so she hasn't lived there all her life yet. She was born in Europe somewhere where she spent most of her childhood only to move to Canada with her husband after both retired.I believe you said in the thread somewhere that Dr. Dean was a teacher at a University in France.
Cut out the "witch hunt" Lorraine, you're posting silliness again trying in vain to catch me in some typo or whatever like Antony does.
JayGarcia wrote:I'm also Mickey Mouse, pass the cheese.I think you are probably Dantu as well.
And I have no idea where you got Seattle from. I currently live in my office in Kenner, LOUISIANA until I can get access to my home in New Orleans, only 25 mins away ....
You, Mr Jay Garcia just so ashamed to hear what you've done to SillyDog701. I've mentioned a number of times before, it was necessary.JayGarcia (in post ID [sdp=63845]63845[/sdp]) wrote:Simply because I believe it to be ludicrous and two-faced to be singled out in a Katrina thread where my <cough> safety was such a big concern and at the same time, Antony took the opportunity to exploit a past incident which was satisfied amicably, at least from point of view it was.Mr. Jay Garcia, why are you so annoyed with being mentioned in a thread?
Tell us, does Mr Jay Garcia take wrong medicine?JayGarcia (in post ID [sdp=63845]63845[/sdp]) wrote:Tell, us .. Does Antony snore?
Just some proper reference. Why are you so afraid of reading so?JayGarcia (in post ID [sdp=63848]63848[/sdp]) wrote:Tell us what YOUR take is on including the reference to the past incidents, etc. There just wasn't any plausible reason for it.
Slamming you?JayGarcia (in post ID [sdp=63855]63855[/sdp]) wrote:Hmmm, so you think that Antony had every right to be concerned about my welfare AND slam me in the same breath ... Ok, thanks for your opinion.
Senior FBI and Justice Department officials warned Americans who want to donate money to the relief effort to be cautious to avoid fraudulent charities, including those that pretend to be major organisations like the Red Cross.
"Just like these natural disasters bring out the best in people, they also bring out some of the worst elements of the criminal element out there who are willing to take advantage of those who are willing to give and those who so desperately need the relief," said Chris Swecker, chief of the FBI's criminal investigative division.
Anyone see the different?JayGarcia (in post ID [sdp=63859]63859[/sdp]) wrote:What I would have done under similar circumstances would be:
"A typhoon hit Melbourne today and we're very concerned about the welfare of Antony Shen, the main driving force behind SillyDog701 Support Forum. We wish Antony the best".
And THAT my friend would be all that's necessary. Would it have been the right thing to do to add after that:
"Oh and by the way, Antony was just released from jail after serving 10 years for manslaughter". I suppose you won't see my point and that is WHY bring that up as to how does that relate to a concern for his welfare? <sigh>
hmm, now you start the cybersquatting case.JayGarcia (in post ID [sdp=63862]63862[/sdp]) wrote:Man o man, are you grossly mis-informed. Me? Steal users? My UFAQ enjoys an average of 70,000+ hits on a daily basis and today a little over 3,000 registered users. Why should anyone need to steal users, including Antony? I don't see any reason whatsoever for him OR me to need to steal users. That is completely absurd.
The word censoring episode was conducted in UFAQ.org as an insult to SillyDog701. Today, no apologies from UFAQ.org has been offered, from anyone on behalf of UFAQ.org.JayGarcia (in post ID [sdp=63862]63862[/sdp]) wrote:And "word replacing" ?? I suppose you're referencing the "censor" thing. Can you read and comprehend that I didn't do any such thing.
SillyDog701 is not interested in concealing evidences, unlike some other forums, deleting posts and removing memberships based on certain people's temper.JayGarcia (in post ID [sdp=63870]63870[/sdp]) wrote:You'll also notice that I don't make screenshots of posts here and use them on the UFAQ for ANY reason whatsoever, I run a clean and "to the point" support forum. IMHO, it's rather juvenile to consistently take screenshots of other's fora to use in such a manner as on this forum.
Interesting, you just did.JayGarcia (in post ID [sdp=63874]63874[/sdp]) wrote:Please understand that I do NOT snoop other people's servers and post personal data and such. We're far above doing things like that.
Wow! Mr Jay Garcia has ethics, but why did you unethically attack SillyDog701?JayGarcia (in post ID [sdp=63877]63877[/sdp]) wrote:What I mentioned was not an accusation but rather just a statement of ethics which had nothing to do with your visit earlier this evening.
Liar!JayGarcia (in post ID [sdp=63884]63884[/sdp]) wrote:You're missing the point. Antony REGISTERED the domain UFAQ.NET but was not re-directed until I found out and mentioned it and when I asked, he failed to reply. THEN he redirected it claiming all the bunk about protecting the UFAQ. Man if you believe that line I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you.
It was then that I registered all of the domains AND redirected to UFAQ.ORG in order to get his attention. The rest is history ..... Dems da facts.
This paragraph was not just sanctimoniously mentioned by Mr. JayGarcia, but also praised by Mr Jay Garcia's good pal, DrDean, who happened to speak same English as Mr Jay Garcia and as impatient as Mr Jay Garcia. ([sdp=56886]reference[/sdp])JayGarcia (in footer of SillyDog.info, SillyDog.us, and SillyDog701.org) wrote:The Domains SillyDog.info, SillyDog.us and SillyDog701.org are being re-directed to this site solely for the purpose of protecting Mr. Antony Shen from another person using these domains to redirect to casino sites, porn sites and/or other sites that may damage Mr. Shens's good reputation in the community.
Ridiculous!JayGarcia (in page [sdp=63893]63893[/sdp]) wrote:So let's bring up the banning of Antony as an example. At first, yes, Antony was banned on the UFAQ, it was my doing, I did it .. on purpose. It was only meant to last for a day or so but I forgot about it. A while later, don't remember how long it was, Antony decided to make a big deal about here in this forum. I denied it simply because I had forgotten about it. But then I did remember doing it and I told Antony exactly that. So what do you think Antony did to "prove" his point. He enlisted the aid of one of his cohorts to UNETHICALLY access my .htaccess file, send it to Antony after which Antony posted it for all the public to see. For those of you that don't know what a .htaccess file is, it is a file that contains IP addresses that are denied access to my UFAQ and yes, his IP was in the list but later removed. Although the file is accessible, someone has to KNOW that it's there AND how to access it. Antony does, of course. My point is that Antony had no business snooping around my server as it is a code of ethics between ISP's and administrators that you JUST DON'T DO THAT sorta thing.
Ha ha.JayGarcia (in post ID [sdp=63896]63896[/sdp]) wrote:I have no idea how or why and I AM the server admin/moderator - chief cook and bottle washer. But ... he accused Chris Ilias of somehow doing it as well as others of doing it even though I explained that it must have been some glitch or gremlins as WE just don't cancel or delete someone's post for no reason.
Your accusation is false. SillyDog701 and I do not operate in such manner and have no whatsoever interests on you web server. Allow me to remind you, many people, including Mr Jay Garcia, have shell access as well.Ron Williams wrote:I am simply to the point of no return regarding my anger toward Antony Shen. After I angered Antony, several related hacks happened on my website. I must warn you Antony, if things like this continue, I will immediately contact the US FBI and hands over all server access logs and contact your host regarding your illegal behavior. It would be horrible if the FBI confiscated your server for investigation (not in my opinion, but for you and your users it would). Considering you have shell access, you could have your server doing this.
Registered users: Google [Bot]