Michael Jackson is Innocent

Our lounge for socialising and for all general topics in good taste. Including all SillyDog701 related issues.

Postby Al » Mon 10 Jan, 2005 7:32 pm

Maybe, who know, this is a forum
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041108 Firefox/1.0
User of Firefox :ff: 3.0 on Windows XP
User avatar
Al
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1694
Joined: Fri 20 Dec, 2002 1:08 pm

Postby Lorraine » Sat 29 Jan, 2005 6:06 pm

Michael Jackson is innocent until proven guilty.
His trial will start Monday, January 31st.
-Lorraine
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
User avatar
Lorraine
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1142
Joined: Mon 21 Apr, 2003 6:55 pm

Michael Jackson is innocent.

Postby Antony » Mon 31 Jan, 2005 9:48 am

[size=125][b]“[Michael Jackson] will be acquitted and vindicated when the truth is toldâ€
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.5.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.12
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 15483
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Edward » Tue 01 Feb, 2005 7:29 pm

Lorraine wrote:Michael Jackson is innocent until proven guilty.
His trial will start Monday, January 31st.
-Lorraine


That's how it is in the U.S.

The jury selection began yesterday (31 January). Cameras are not being allowed in the courtroom for the trial, so the E! cable channel in the U.S. plans to have daily reenactments using actors.
UserAgent: Opera/8.0 (X11; Linux i586; U; en)
Edward

SillyDog701 Moderator
Fedora - SeaMonkey - Claws Mail
User avatar
Edward
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 3900
Joined: Sun 01 Dec, 2002 7:15 pm

Postby Antony » Wed 02 Feb, 2005 9:24 am

Usually, most people don't want to be jury for a number of reasons, usually lengthy (6+ months), stressed, and not well compensated.

For Superstar Michael Jackson's case, 250 out of 450 people summoned for jury duty wanting to work on the Jackson trial.

Michael Jackson has made another unprecedented phenomenon in HIStory - the unprecedented demand for jury seats.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.5.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.12
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 15483
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby keith » Sat 05 Feb, 2005 1:34 am

has anyone seen the Just Lose It, music video of Eminem's?

keith
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
KEITH
User avatar
keith
gold member
gold member
 
Posts: 687
Joined: Mon 02 Feb, 2004 11:49 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Postby Antony » Sat 05 Feb, 2005 3:36 am

keith wrote:has anyone seen the Just Lose It, music video of Eminem's?
That video is completely unethical. Eminem should be sued for that video.

You can watch that video in iTunes Music Store.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.5.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.12
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 15483
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby keith » Sat 05 Feb, 2005 6:03 pm

You sound like you work for itunes or something, antony.
Keith
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0
KEITH
User avatar
keith
gold member
gold member
 
Posts: 687
Joined: Mon 02 Feb, 2004 11:49 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Postby Lorraine » Mon 07 Feb, 2005 1:20 am

Antony wrote:
Usually, most people don't want to be jury for a number of reasons, usually lengthy (6+ months), stressed, and not well compensated.


Well I would love to be a juror. I like to watch court
trials and I find most people you speak to after a trial, haven't watched the DNA section of a trial, and other little things that just seem to get through. I don't think they pick the right jurors most of the time. Then when they are declared "Guilty" they will say they "were not guilty, or vice versa."

In circumstantial cases, it is very difficult to say someone is guilty, however it happens many times. IMHO, there is usally sufficient evidence for a Not Guilty Verdict yet they are often declared Guilty.
That is the the reason for so many appeals, along with other things of course, but you ask, " Why does it take so long for a case to be tried?" IMO, Because of the amount of appeals and lawyers knowing that some of their questioning will be over-ruled.

I think everyone should have a fair trial, don't get me wrong, but some lawyers, both Prosecutors along with Defence attorneys push it at times.
-Lorraine
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
User avatar
Lorraine
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1142
Joined: Mon 21 Apr, 2003 6:55 pm

Postby Antony » Wed 23 Feb, 2005 5:36 pm

Four men and eight women are selected for the trial of super star Michael Jackson on charges by those greedy parents.

Another 8 alternates will be selected in case any jurors dismissed during trial

BBC reports
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.5.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.12
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 15483
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

MJ

Postby Ron Williams » Wed 23 Feb, 2005 5:58 pm

I took a poll in my government and 17/22 said he was guilty and 7/17 said that MJ bought off the previous people.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0
User avatar
Ron Williams
BANNED
BANNED
 
Posts: 845
Joined: Tue 25 Nov, 2003 9:47 am
Location: Cambridge, Maryland

Re: MJ

Postby Antony » Sat 26 Feb, 2005 7:30 pm

piranarew wrote:I took a poll in my government and 17/22 said he was guilty and 7/17 said that MJ bought off the previous people.
Exactly, what is *your* government?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.5.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.12
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 15483
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Accuser's mother 'has a history of making false claims'

Postby Antony » Sat 26 Feb, 2005 7:37 pm

Accuser's mother 'has a history of making false claims'

Michael Jackson's lawyers will present evidence to a court that the mother of his teenage accuser has a history of making false accusations about sexual assaults. It will also claim that she has coached him to make false allegations.

accuser's family in a previous lawsuit it had brought against the clothing store JC Penney. In that case, said the defence, the mother claimed that she was beaten and sexually assaulted by JC Penney security guards following a scuffle that broke out when her son - then seven - was accused of shoplifting. The family sued the clothing store and eventually received a settlement of $137,500 (£72,000).

It was reported that the defence will present testimony from a mystery witness - a paralegal who worked at the law firm that represented the woman suing JC Penney. The paralegal has apparently told Jackson's defence team that the woman, known in court papers as Jane Doe to protect the identity of her son, lied under oath and fabricated the charges against the JC Penney security guards. She has further alleged that the bruises suffered by the woman were not inflicted by the guards but by someone else.

...

The lawyer also said the woman had hid assets from the settlement to get welfare payments from Los Angeles County and that she even had her son ask celebrities such as TV comedian Jay Leno for money. She then spent some of the money on cosmetic surgery.


(Jackson trial: Accuser's mother 'has a history of making false claims', The Independent, 27th Feb 2005)
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.5.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.12
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 15483
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: MJ

Postby Ron Williams » Sat 26 Feb, 2005 11:26 pm

Antony wrote:
piranarew wrote:I took a poll in my government and 17/22 said he was guilty and 7/17 said that MJ bought off the previous people.
Exactly, what is *your* government?


sorry I meant governmeant class
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050223 Firefox/1.0.1
User avatar
Ron Williams
BANNED
BANNED
 
Posts: 845
Joined: Tue 25 Nov, 2003 9:47 am
Location: Cambridge, Maryland

Postby Antony » Wed 02 Mar, 2005 2:48 am

From Bashir testifies in Jacko trial (News.com.au, March 02, 2005)
Hitting back at Mr Sneddon's claims Jackson had masturbated with the boy and showed him pornographic magazines and websites, Mr Mesereau said two massive police searches of Neverland had failed to turn up any genetic evidence of abuse.

"The ... children's DNA was never found in Michael Jackson's bedroom after searching and testing," Mr Mesereau said. "The DNA isn't there, because the molestation claims are fiction."

Prosecutors claim fingerprints belonging to both Jackson and his accuser were allegedly found on a pornographic magazine seized from the star's bedroom and the star plied the youngster with liquor.

But Mr Mesereau said the boy and his brother were out of control, breaking into Jackson's wine cellar and helping themselves to his collection of raunchy magazines, tucked away in a suitcase in his room.

"Mr Jackson will freely admit he read girlie magazines from time to time," Mr Mesereau told jurors, adding Jackson sent aides to buy the magazines at a local store. But, he said, "he denies showing them to children".

Mr Mesereau also dismissed allegations Jackson conspired with five aides and business associates, who have not been charged, to kidnap the boy and his mother, brother and sister and keep them prisoner at Neverland.

He said during the period in which the accuser's mother claims she was held prisoner, she was chauffeured to a beauty salon at her own request and never tried to raise the alarm. "That is absurd," Mr Mesereau said.

Mr Mesereau said the mother, whom he portrayed as a rapacious financial predator with a history of trying to con celebrities, accused Jackson of molestation only when she realised she would not profit from the star.

Up until that point, she had described Jackson as a father to her children. "When she realised she was not going to make millions of dollars one way, she found another way, and here we are," he said.


As I always said, Michael Jackson is innocent, and the kids' parents are greedy.
Who is prosecutor Tom Sneddon? He was the one accusing Michael Jackson back in 1993, but failed. According to various reports, he has personal vendetta against Michael Jackson.
“Some supporters of Michael Jackson claim that he [Sneddon] is involved in a conspiracy against him [Jackson].â€
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.5.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.12
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 15483
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

PreviousNext

Return to SillyDog701 Lounge

Who is online

Registered users: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]