SillyDog701

by **Fulvio** » Sat 01 May, 2004 3:08 pm

Can someone summarize this nonsense? It does help anyone. Somebody should just stop.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8

by **DJGM** » Sat 01 May, 2004 3:43 pm

The one thing I'll say about this, the new icons may have only been implemented in the Windows
build, and not the builds for Mac OS X and Linux, but then this is only a "release candidate" build
that we're on about here. Who's to say that these new icons won't be included in the builds
for Mac and Linux between what have now and the eventual release of 1.7 final . . . ?

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421

by **ChrisI** » Sat 01 May, 2004 7:58 pm

DJGM wrote:Who's to say that these new icons won't be included in the builds for Mac and Linux between what have now and the eventual release of 1.7 final . . . ?

Very unlikely. This is based on Bug 99380, with the comment:
"Yes, this started out as a cross-platform bug, but eventually became Windows-specific. Reason being there are different expectations on other platforms (especially Mac) and one set shared by all platforms isn't possible."

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040428

by **Antony** » Sat 01 May, 2004 8:15 pm

Fulvio wrote:Can someone summarize this nonsense? It does help anyone.

Sure,
ChrisI made an announcement post.

I (Antony) noticed one of the statements claimed in Mozilla 1.7 RC1's Release Notes was not true. The questioning statement: â€œA new set of icons for files that are associated with Mozilla.â€

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/124 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.1

by **Alice** » Mon 03 May, 2004 1:35 pm

Epilogue:

Helper Application Bug

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421

by **jksteinhauer** » Mon 03 May, 2004 6:16 pm

Bottom line: This IS supposed to be a forum of friends sharing FRIENDLY interchange and information. I am correct in this am I not? I deal with 'putting out fires' on a daily basis as soon as I walk out the door in the morning in my physical world.
Silly Dog has been one of those oasis's of intelligent, civilized exchange that I have come to rely on for worthy information and some PEACE and QUIET! Not that everyday or entry has to be all happy chocolate all of the time; there'll always be a ripple anywhere at any given time, granted, but this isn't a competition of intelligence or wit or resourcefulness, but a gathering of friends sharing friendly input. Am I right or wrong?
Just my 2 cents.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421

by **jksteinhauer** » Mon 03 May, 2004 9:26 pm

jksteinhauer wrote:Bottom line: This IS supposed to be a forum of friends sharing FRIENDLY interchange and information. I am correct in this am I not? I deal with 'putting out fires' on a daily basis as soon as I walk out the door in the morning in my physical world.
Silly Dog has been one of those oasis's of intelligent, civilized exchange that I have come to rely on for worthy information and some PEACE and QUIET! Not that everyday or entry has to be all happy chocolate all of the time; there'll always be a ripple anywhere at any given time, granted, but this isn't a competition of intelligence or wit or resourcefulness, but a gathering of friends sharing friendly input. Am I right or wrong?
Just my 2 cents.

The new Mozilla icons are swell.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421

by **Antony** » Wed 05 May, 2004 3:14 am

jksteinhauer wrote:Bottom line: This IS supposed to be a forum of friends sharing FRIENDLY interchange and information. I am correct in this am I not?

Yes, that's one of the goals of SillyDog701.

jksteinhauer wrote:Silly Dog has been one of those oasis's of intelligent, civilized exchange that I have come to rely on for worthy information and some PEACE and QUIET!

Thank you for your nice comments.

jksteinhauer wrote:Not that everyday or entry has to be all happy chocolate all of the time; there'll always be a ripple anywhere at any given time, granted, but this isn't a competition of intelligence or wit or resourcefulness, but a gathering of friends sharing friendly input. Am I right or wrong?

Well, I believe the correctness and the accuracy is somehow very important.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/124 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.1

by **Gregor** » Mon 24 May, 2004 1:07 am

Meanwhile the Moz. 1.7 RC2 was released.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8a1) Gecko/20040520

by **jksteinhauer** » Mon 24 May, 2004 10:03 pm

Gregor wrote:Meanwhile the Moz. 1.7 RC2 was released.

Indeed it has and is performing superbly.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514

by **Edward** » Sun 30 May, 2004 11:14 am

jksteinhauer wrote:
Gregor wrote:Meanwhile the Moz. 1.7 RC2 was released.

Indeed it has and is performing superbly.

What did they do to it???

Even on my Linux-only 166 MHz Pentium/MMX box, 1.7 RC2 loads and runs faster than 1.6 did...

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514

by **Wellander** » Tue 08 Jun, 2004 11:50 pm

Hi,
This is very obsolete now.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040608

by **Edward** » Wed 09 Jun, 2004 5:05 pm

And I'm having problems with both Linux and Windows versions of 1.7 RC2.

UserAgent: Opera/7.51 (Windows NT 5.1; U) [en]

SillyDog701

Mozilla 1.7 Release Candidate 1 Released

Who is online