SillyDog701

by **vipergg** » Wed 18 Feb, 2004 7:46 pm

I like the browser and it is fast but it has some conflict with my TV card in my pc , causes the screen not to come up . As soon as I close it everything is ok , don't know what the conflict would be . If I don't have the TV on there is no problem but I use it quite a bit .

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 (CK-SillyDog)

by **Antony** » Wed 18 Feb, 2004 8:32 pm

report to Mozilla's Bugzilla? with the detail of your TV card would be great.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/85.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/85.6

by **Edward** » Thu 26 Feb, 2004 7:12 pm

I cannot get Firefox to load in Linux (SuSE 9.0). The instructions state to run the file "firefox", when this is done, nothing happens. The animated cursor appears as expected, then stops/dissappears after several seconds.

Two different downloads on different evenings, same result.

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; X11; Linux i586) Opera 7.23 [en]

by **Mandrake** » Thu 26 Feb, 2004 10:34 pm

FireFox runs fine here on Windows and Linux . . .

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

by **Hendikins** » Fri 27 Feb, 2004 2:51 am

I've been using the 0.8 release on SuSE 9.0 until a few mins ago, when I actually did an updated CVS build. Not a problem.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040227 Firefox/0.8.0+

by **Edward** » Fri 27 Feb, 2004 6:36 pm

I installed it on my dual-boot system this time, extracted the .GZ into the specified directory, ran "firefox" and received the same results as above. Launching Konqueror and clicking "firefox" from that same directory, also did nothing on both systems.

Total of three downloads, on two different systems running SuSE 9.0, and it doesn't run at all on either system.

Sorry.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

by **Hendikins** » Fri 27 Feb, 2004 7:08 pm

Try the following as root:

* Extract to [tt]/opt/firefox[/tt]
* [tt]cd /usr/X11R6/bin[/tt]
* [tt]ln -s /opt/firefox/firefox[/tt]
* [tt]ln -s /opt/firefox/firefox /usr/X11R6/bin/MozillaFirebird[/tt]

The last one is to fool apps such as X-Chat 2.0.7 that know about Firebird, and not Firefox.

-posted using the 0.8 release on SuSE 9.0-

BBCode formatted by Admin 8.10.2004)

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040207 Firefox/0.8

by **Edward** » Fri 27 Feb, 2004 8:38 pm

I've already deleted the directories on both systems where Firefox was "installed", I'd rather not try it a third time.

I went so far as to name the directory something different, i.e. username/newbrowser/firefox (all files went here), still nothing...

I do not install anything under root on either system though.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

by **Hendikins** » Sat 28 Feb, 2004 4:09 am

Well, I told you how to make it work correctly, system-wide. Don't blame me when it doesn't work when you don't do what I suggest...

(oh, and it is always [tt]./firefox[/tt] if you're in the directory that contains it)

- Posted with the 0.8 release, again, on SuSE 9.0, again -

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040207 Firefox/0.8

by **Edward** » Sat 28 Feb, 2004 7:21 am

Hendikins wrote:Well, I told you how to make it work correctly, system-wide. Don't blame me when it doesn't work when you don't do what I suggest...

(oh, and it is always ./firefox if you're in the directory that contains it)

Not blaming you.

The above did not work from the desktop pointing to /path/firefox/./firefox

Probably because of this error when I ran ./firefox via the console window:

firefox/run-mozilla.sh: line 451: 3411 Illegal instruction "$prog" ${1+"$@"}

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

by **djv1** » Mon 15 Mar, 2004 12:47 pm

firefox works great, wish that it was on all computers, unlike this one, unfortunately.

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)

by **ryaxnb** » Mon 15 Mar, 2004 10:30 pm

hartlandcat wrote:
Mozilla Foundation wrote:Why Firefox?
Although the new Aqua features for Mac OS X look great... I still don't really see any reason to use it over Camino. Can someone tell me... does the rendering engine now have the Aqua feel (like Camino does), or does it still have the Windows-like feel, similar to Netscape 7 on Mac OS X.

Forum buttons still look like they're in Windows 98. However, there are some reasons:
* Extensions
* More web developer features
* More Preferences.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US) AppleWebKit/85 (KHTML, like Gecko) OmniWeb/v533

by **djv1** » Tue 23 Mar, 2004 12:48 pm

I find that fiefox doesn't have quite as many options as Netscape 7.02

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)

SillyDog701

Mozilla Firebird Renamed Firefox, Version 0.8 Released

Firefox

Who is online