Netscape 7.2 folder on NS FTP server

Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, Camino, Mozilla, Netscape 6/7/8/9, and all Gecko-based browsers discussion and support forum. (MozInfo701, Netscape Browser Archive)

Moderators: Fulvio, profman, Ramona, Antony, Edward

Postby Antony » Wed 28 Jul, 2004 9:20 am

T_Moz wrote:
Antony wrote:
T_Moz wrote:
Antony wrote:
T_Moz wrote:I just admit that some info that I have posted is from very reputable sources that I will not name and some is specualtion so that information that appears here can not be traced to my sources :D
Either you are covering yourself up OR you've just admitted that your reputable source is not reliable.
my reputable source is reliable. I have speculated on some occasions to cover my tracks.
Nice trick, does NOT work.
I still think that everything will come out the way I speculated, just I have confirmed some info with reliable sources that will not talk about other info
Haven't you noticed that a number of people have stopped "begging" you for further information.
They know EITHER you are trying hard to cover yourself up OR your reputable source is not reliable.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.8
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14953
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby James » Wed 28 Jul, 2004 9:45 am

In truth, I think many of us are just plain bored with the whole thing. I was anxious for Netscape 7.2 to make its appearance but that was a month ago. When it finally arrives on the scene, I'll take a look at it but I'm no longer that excited. When I became bored I migrated over to Opera and I'm enjoying 7.53 a great deal. So... when NS comes, it comes. If it's in August... fine. September is okay too. October? Well... whatever.
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) Opera 7.53 [en]
James
User avatar
James
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2963
Joined: Sat 13 Jul, 2002 12:10 am

Postby orizng » Wed 28 Jul, 2004 10:03 am

yeah right, Im going to order it when its out, and not really want to use it more often over firefox.
as to opera, i suggest u set opera to identify itself as opera, not MSIE6.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040727 Waterunicorn/0.9.1+
Whatever,whatever,have a nice day.
User avatar
orizng
silver member
silver member
 
Posts: 325
Joined: Mon 12 Aug, 2002 2:50 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby beanboy89 » Wed 28 Jul, 2004 10:34 am

orizng wrote:as to opera, i suggest u set opera to identify itself as opera, not MSIE6.

Check out [sdt=3373]this[/sdt] thread in the Opera Forum about Opera UserAgent spoofing.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707
User avatar
beanboy89
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1689
Joined: Sun 16 May, 2004 8:56 am

Postby T_Moz » Wed 28 Jul, 2004 11:49 am

Antony wrote:
T_Moz wrote:
Antony wrote:
T_Moz wrote:
Antony wrote:
T_Moz wrote:I just admit that some info that I have posted is from very reputable sources that I will not name and some is specualtion so that information that appears here can not be traced to my sources :D
Either you are covering yourself up OR you've just admitted that your reputable source is not reliable.
my reputable source is reliable. I have speculated on some occasions to cover my tracks.
Nice trick, does NOT work.
I still think that everything will come out the way I speculated, just I have confirmed some info with reliable sources that will not talk about other info
Haven't you noticed that a number of people have stopped "begging" you for further information.
They know EITHER you are trying hard to cover yourself up OR your reputable source is not reliable.
as I have said earlier "I would have not even posted if I hadn't seen the download page." in reference to a page that is not available to most people currently. what that page looks like not -- I can't tell look at http://www.google.com/search?q=site:cha ... N&filter=0
for a fun guess about that availability of streamlined distros
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040625 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
User avatar
T_Moz
member.
member.
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue 01 Apr, 2003 3:23 pm

Postby Antony » Wed 28 Jul, 2004 12:08 pm

T_Moz wrote: as I have said earlier "I would have not even posted if I hadn't seen the download page." in reference to a page that is not available to most people currently. what that page looks like not -- I can't tell look at http://www.google.com/search?q=site:cha ... N&filter=0
for a fun guess about that availability of streamlined distros
What's that to do with Streamline?

Your [sdp=37496]first post[/sdp] regarding the Netscape 7.2, just two links.
Your [sdp=37584]second post[/sdp], which was made after 18 complaints, "Netscape 7.2 is out on the streets. You may not be able to download it now. but there is a screenshot at http://www.chevrel.org/fr/carnet/index. ... 0/317-ns72"

Then,
T_Moz wrote:
DJGM wrote:But, where did you manage to get it from? Enquiring minds ned to know!
Can't say :mrgreen: It should be available soon.
:arrow: EITHER lying OR flaunting

Then,
[sdp=37595]T_Moz[/sdp] wrote:
Mandrake wrote:Your not a Mozilla Champion, so you shouldn't have had to sign an NDA :wink: Nothing to stop you from telling us :)
No, I have not signed a NDA But if I told, I would lose all chances of future bliss :wink: I would have not even posted if I hadn't seen the download page.
:arrow: EITHER flaunting OR tricking other people.

Later,
[sdp=37698]T_Moz[/sdp] wrote:
DJGM wrote:
T_Moz wrote: . . . But if I told, I would lose all chances of future bliss :wink: . . .

Or, does that mean something entirely different . . . ?
Something enitrely different which I won't tell for fear that the wrong people would find out :D
:arrow: Trying to cover up?

And you enjoy using a technical support venue for little fun to yourself?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.8
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14953
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby James » Wed 28 Jul, 2004 1:33 pm

Hey... thanks for the heads up on this spoofing business. I actually hadn't given any thought to it and since it came set to default as IE 6 I just left it that way. I've taken the steps to correct it.
UserAgent: Opera/7.53 (Windows NT 5.1; U) [en]
James
User avatar
James
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2963
Joined: Sat 13 Jul, 2002 12:10 am

Postby T_Moz » Thu 29 Jul, 2004 8:22 am

Antony wrote:
T_Moz wrote: as I have said earlier "I would have not even posted if I hadn't seen the download page." in reference to a page that is not available to most people currently. what that page looks like not -- I can't tell look at http://www.google.com/search?q=site:cha ... N&filter=0
for a fun guess about that availability of streamlined distros
What's that to do with Streamline?

Your [sdp=37496]first post[/sdp] regarding the Netscape 7.2, just two links.
Your [sdp=37584]second post[/sdp], which was made after 18 complaints, "Netscape 7.2 is out on the streets. You may not be able to download it now. but there is a screenshot at http://www.chevrel.org/fr/carnet/index. ... 0/317-ns72"

Then,
T_Moz wrote:
DJGM wrote:But, where did you manage to get it from? Enquiring minds ned to know!
Can't say :mrgreen: It should be available soon.
:arrow: EITHER lying OR flaunting

Then,
[sdp=37595]T_Moz[/sdp] wrote:
Mandrake wrote:Your not a Mozilla Champion, so you shouldn't have had to sign an NDA :wink: Nothing to stop you from telling us :)
No, I have not signed a NDA But if I told, I would lose all chances of future bliss :wink: I would have not even posted if I hadn't seen the download page.
:arrow: EITHER flaunting OR tricking other people.

Later,
[sdp=37698]T_Moz[/sdp] wrote:
DJGM wrote:
T_Moz wrote: . . . But if I told, I would lose all chances of future bliss :wink: . . .

Or, does that mean something entirely different . . . ?
Something enitrely different which I won't tell for fear that the wrong people would find out :D
:arrow: Trying to cover up?

And you enjoy using a technical support venue for little fun to yourself?
I don't think that any info that i am willing to give will change your opinions. but i will say that the google search I linked to contains a link to http://channels-stage.netscape.com/ns/browsers/cck.jsp .
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040625 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
User avatar
T_Moz
member.
member.
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue 01 Apr, 2003 3:23 pm

Postby Fulvio » Thu 29 Jul, 2004 12:08 pm

T_Moz,
I tried to ignore this disgusting thread, and I don't blame you for your replies.
And, this is for Antony.
Could we not have a special forum for these arguments? This is has nothing to do with Netscape or Mozilla.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) (CK-SillyDog)
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, SM2.17.1, FF21, TB17.O.5, IE8.0, Google Chrome 27, Ghostwall , Avast 8.0.1, JRE1.7_21.
User avatar
Fulvio
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12004
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 10:08 am

Postby DJGM » Thu 29 Jul, 2004 12:13 pm

T_Moz wrote:. . . but i will say that the google search I linked to contains a link
to http://channels-stage.netscape.com/ns/browsers/cck.jsp .


So, I guess that means there will be a CCK to accompany Netscape 7.2 . . . doesn't it . . . ?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4630
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK

Postby T_Moz » Thu 29 Jul, 2004 12:24 pm

DJGM wrote:
T_Moz wrote:. . . but i will say that the google search I linked to contains a link
to http://channels-stage.netscape.com/ns/browsers/cck.jsp .


So, I guess that means there will be a CCK to accompany Netscape 7.2 . . . doesn't it . . . ?
It says that to me
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040625 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
User avatar
T_Moz
member.
member.
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue 01 Apr, 2003 3:23 pm

Postby cuppettcj » Thu 29 Jul, 2004 2:08 pm

T_Moz wrote:I am not in charge of setting release dates. I still do not expect a release until calender.netscape.com is taken down to facilitate the "new" calender. as calender.netscape.com is still up (in modified form). I must protect my sources of info by including speculation :D in every post so that truth can not be traced to its source or be distinguished from the nonsense that covers my tracks so well :lol:


Well, if it means anything, calender.netscape.com has been finally taken down, at least for me. I suppose that means (according to T_Moz) we can expect 7.2 to be posted any time now.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) (CK-SillyDog)
cuppettcj
member
member
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed 03 Sep, 2003 5:30 pm
Location: Linden, VA

Postby Fulvio » Thu 29 Jul, 2004 10:38 pm

The link means this to me: This area can not be accessed by your account.

This usually happens because:

* Membership or Special permissions are required.
* Availability is limited by geographic region.

If you believe that your account should be able to access this area, please contact Customer Service to report the problem.

If you would like to make another selection, click on your browser's back button to return to the previous page.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, SM2.17.1, FF21, TB17.O.5, IE8.0, Google Chrome 27, Ghostwall , Avast 8.0.1, JRE1.7_21.
User avatar
Fulvio
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12004
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 10:08 am

Postby Don_HH2K » Fri 30 Jul, 2004 8:22 am

Fulvio wrote:The link means this to me: This area can not be accessed by your account.

This usually happens because:

* Membership or Special permissions are required.
* Availability is limited by geographic region.

If you believe that your account should be able to access this area, please contact Customer Service to report the problem.

If you would like to make another selection, click on your browser's back button to return to the previous page.

I'm guessing you are referring to this:
Image
That was put into effect on June 13 if I remember correctly, due to people without authorization accessing the download page before it was ready.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) Mnenhy/0.6.0.104
User avatar
Don_HH2K
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5112
Joined: Sun 09 May, 2004 3:59 pm

Postby Antony » Sat 31 Jul, 2004 3:21 am

T_Moz wrote:I don't think that any info that i am willing to give will change your opinions. but i will say that the google search I linked to contains a link to http://channels-stage.netscape.com/ns/browsers/cck.jsp .
You call those as "info"?

Extremely vague information.
In other words, telling people nothing, but more of less with strong intention of teasing SillyDog701 members and flaunting.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/125.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.8
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14953
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

PreviousNext

Return to Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape

Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot]