my last post was obscure, even to myself. I have no clue what I meant by performance. Maybe, I was referring to Seamonkey1.1, or may be to NS8.x. But, i wanted to tell that the name Seamonkey is not obligatory. But, I, still, find SM1.1 much slower in getting started than 1.0.7. Everything else being equal SM1.1 takes me more than twice as long to start. After that it is fine,
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:188.8.131.52) Gecko/20061206 Firefox/184.108.40.206
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, SM2.17.1, FF21, TB17.O.5, IE8.0, Google Chrome 26, Ghostwall , Kingsoft5.6, JRE1.7_21.