Old Mac user...Have I Gone as far as I can go?

Apple products and Mac operating systems. Including discussions on Virtual PC for Mac, Parallels Desktop for Mac, all Apple hardware and everything relating to Mac!
(MacCentre701)

Moderator: Mandrake

Old Mac user...Have I Gone as far as I can go?

Postby woodstockric » Sun 27 Jun, 2004 6:28 pm

I'm using a Macintosh G-3 PowerPC(biege) OS 9.2.2 - 266mhz
With Internet Explorer 5.1.7 and I was told by eBay that my
Browser needs to be updated :?
At the bottom of my emails it shows my Browser as (mosilla/4.0
compatable with IE 5.1.7) and I can't find anything in "updates"
that lists my Browser and OS..is this as far as I can GO? :(

Woodstock Ric :)
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.17; Mac_PowerPC)
woodstockric
new member
new member
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun 27 Jun, 2004 5:39 pm
Location: Vernon,FL

Postby Antony » Sun 27 Jun, 2004 6:49 pm

Try Netscape 7.02 for OS 9.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) (CK-SillyDog)
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14510
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby DJGM » Sun 27 Jun, 2004 6:56 pm

As far as versions of Internet Explorer go for your particular OS, you have reached the end of the line.

But, you can upgrade your browser to any of the following . . .

:arrow: Netscape 7.02

:arrow: Mozilla 1.2.1 (Official build)

:arrow: Mozilla 1.3.1 (Unofficial build)

The last version of Netscape for Mac OS 9.x.x, was Netscape 7.02. Netscape 7.1 was for Mac OS X
only, and the forthcoming Netscape 7.2 will be also. The last official version of Mozilla, to be made
by mozilla.org for Mac OS 9.x.x was Mozilla 1.2.1. All official Mac versions of Mozilla since then are
for Mac OS X only. Meanwhile, there is an unofficial version of Mozilla 1.3.1 for Mac OS 9.x.x.
That is pretty much the latest browser you can get without upgrading to Mac OS X . . .
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4572
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK

Safari

Postby oscar_wonderboy » Tue 13 Jul, 2004 10:07 am

What about Safari or compatible browsers for OS 9.2.2?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3
oscar_wonderboy
new member
new member
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue 13 Jul, 2004 10:00 am

Postby DJGM » Tue 13 Jul, 2004 11:21 am

Safari is strictly for Mac OS X only. The newest browsers available for Mac OS 9.x now, are
the ones I've explained in my earlier message. And even those are getting rather old now.

If you want to use the very latest internet browser on your Macintosh computer, then you
need to upgrade to Mac OS X, for which there are a wide range of web browsers available.

You might want to steer clear of IE 5.x for Mac though. Microsoft completely discon-
tinued all development of that browser for both Mac OS X and Mac OS 9.x last year.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4572
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK

Postby Don_HH2K » Tue 13 Jul, 2004 2:46 pm

DJGM wrote:You might want to steer clear of IE 5.x for Mac though. Microsoft completely discon-
tinued all development of that browser for both Mac OS X and Mac OS 9.x last year.

I would say to steer clear of IE altogether! If a PC's too old, I'd rather be running Netscape 4.8 than IE.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2
User avatar
Don_HH2K
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5112
Joined: Sun 09 May, 2004 3:59 pm

Postby DJGM » Tue 13 Jul, 2004 4:34 pm

dluchini30 wrote:
DJGM wrote:You might want to steer clear of IE 5.x for Mac though. Microsoft completely discon-
tinued all development of that browser for both Mac OS X and Mac OS 9.x last year.


I would say to steer clear of IE altogether!


In most cases, so would I. But, even though IE 5.x for Mac has effectively been rendered obsolete
by it's makers, it's still nowhere near as buggy and unsafe as it's god awful Windows counterpart!
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4572
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK

Postby Don_HH2K » Tue 13 Jul, 2004 4:48 pm

Because of a lack of ActiveX support, I presume? Since I never used IE for Mac, I don't know if it has ActiveX support. Does it?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
User avatar
Don_HH2K
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5112
Joined: Sun 09 May, 2004 3:59 pm

Postby DJGM » Tue 13 Jul, 2004 5:07 pm

dluchini30 wrote:Because of a lack of ActiveX support, I presume? Since I never
used IE for Mac, I don't know if it has ActiveX support. Does it?


AFAIK, the Mac version of IE had very limited ActiveX support, if any.


And the reason Microsoft ditched IE 5.x for Macintosh? One word . . . Safari.

Surprisingly, Microsoft actually conceded (for once) that someone had made a
better browser than IE! Someone from Microsoft's Mac dept. even admitted it!
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4572
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK

Postby Don_HH2K » Tue 13 Jul, 2004 5:16 pm

Either way, Safari is a much better browser than IE, although since my old Mac won't connect to my Lucent gateway I never used it at all. Since it uses KHTML, I can already see how a page looks in it by using Konqueror on my Linux machine, although that's very busy right now scanning Netscape's 11 main FTP servers.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
User avatar
Don_HH2K
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5112
Joined: Sun 09 May, 2004 3:59 pm


Return to Mac OS and Apple

Who is online

Registered users: Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot]