UserAgent: Opera/7.52 (Windows NT 5.1; U) [en]
Opera 7.52 Improvements
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Opera 7.52 Improvements
by Jeffredo » Wed 07 Jul, 2004 7:49 am
In addition to the security fix the changlog states "various stability and rendering improvements". I definitely notice a speed increase, especially with sites with lots of graphics that used to slow it down. It may dull my enthusiam for Netscape 7.2 at this rate!
Jeff
-
Jeffredo - super member
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar, 2004 11:40 pm
- Location: Monterey, California
by Fulvio » Wed 07 Jul, 2004 3:46 pm
Any Opera was faster than any Netscape or Mozilla.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, SM2.9.1, FF12, TB12.0.1, IE8.0, Google Chrome18, Ghostwall , Avast 7.x, JRE1.7_04. Testing FF13b4
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, SM2.9.1, FF12, TB12.0.1, IE8.0, Google Chrome18, Ghostwall , Avast 7.x, JRE1.7_04. Testing FF13b4
-
Fulvio - Moderator
- Posts: 11916
- Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 10:08 am
by Jeffredo » Wed 07 Jul, 2004 5:12 pm
Actually, I tested Firebird 0.7 through Firefox 0.9.1 against current Opera releases with www.numion.com/Stopwatch/ and it was neck and neck. Firefox 0.9 usually beat Opera 7.51. I haven't tested the newest versions of both yet, but I think Opera might have the advantage now.
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Jeff
-
Jeffredo - super member
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar, 2004 11:40 pm
- Location: Monterey, California
by Edward » Wed 07 Jul, 2004 5:53 pm
7.52 runs faster on Windows 98SE. I haven't tried it on XP Home yet, but on one of my Linux boxes (the faster of the two), it is running faster than 7.51.
The real Linux test will be on the Pentium 166 MHz box with the 98 Mb of RAM.
The real Linux test will be on the Pentium 166 MHz box with the 98 Mb of RAM.
UserAgent: Opera/7.52 (X11; Linux i586; U) [en]
-
Edward - Moderator
- Posts: 3584
- Joined: Sun 01 Dec, 2002 7:15 pm
by Don_HH2K » Wed 07 Jul, 2004 6:00 pm
Edward wrote:The real Linux test will be on the Pentium 166 MHz box with the 98 Mb of RAM.
How about... 98SE with Pentium (non-MMX) at 120MHz with 80MB of RAM compared to Firebird 0.7 and K-Meleon 0.8.2?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
-
Don_HH2K - Moderator
- Posts: 5112
- Joined: Sun 09 May, 2004 3:59 pm
by Edward » Wed 07 Jul, 2004 6:03 pm
dluchini30 wrote:Edward wrote:The real Linux test will be on the Pentium 166 MHz box with the 98 Mb of RAM.
How about... 98SE with Pentium (non-MMX) at 120MHz with 80MB of RAM compared to Firebird 0.7 and K-Meleon 0.8.2?
I don't have such a system. The system that has 98SE on it has a 600 MHz AMD Athlon in it.
UserAgent: Opera/7.52 (X11; Linux i586; U) [en]
-
Edward - Moderator
- Posts: 3584
- Joined: Sun 01 Dec, 2002 7:15 pm
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Registered users: Google [Bot]
