Punching a cop? AU$1000

Our lounge for socialising and for all general topics in good taste. Including all SillyDog701 related issues.

Moderators: Edward, profman, Mandrake

Punching a cop? AU$1000

Postby Antony » Fri 06 Aug, 2004 7:50 am

Based on the result from the court. A 22-year-old rugby player punched an off-duty police was fined today for AU$2000 (AU$1000 each for affray and assault causing actual bodily harm to Const Allen). And no he does not need to have any sorts of custodial sentence because he has to be on the rugby ground 5-6 days a week plus play games during weekends.

Image

It's very cheap to punch a police officer, and no sentence once you have a good excuse.

Maitua escaped a custodial sentence after his defence argued that his profession demanded he train five to six days a week and play matches on weekends.


> Footballer guilty of cop bashing (News.com.au, 6 Aug 2004)
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/125.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.8
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14510
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Punching a cop? AU$1000

Postby DJGM » Fri 06 Aug, 2004 11:20 am

Antony wrote:And no he does not need to have any sorts of custodial sentence because he has
to be on the rugby ground 5-6 days a weekplus play games during weekends.


IMHO, there's no excuse for assaulting a police officer. If I'd have been the judge, he'd have
received a minimum 6 months imprisonment, as well as the $2000 fine, regardless of his
sporting career. If such a sentence harms his career in rugby, that's just tough luck.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4572
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK

Postby Shark Daddy » Fri 06 Aug, 2004 11:39 am

Half a year for an assualt is very harsh if no permanent damage was inflicted, especially if this was a first-time offense. That article stresses the fact that the victim was an officer, but we do not know if Maitua knew he was an officer in this brawl. In fact it's implicitly suggested he didn't (and this would be a good defense anyway). Note also that this was a large brawl and was impersonal, having no chance of premeditation on the part of Maitua to assault the policeman. There are so many mitigating factors that I would say the fine is very consistent.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8
Shark Daddy
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 11:19 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby Antony » Fri 06 Aug, 2004 6:31 pm

Shark Daddy wrote:Half a year for an assualt is very harsh if no permanent damage was inflicted, especially if this was a first-time offense.
So a rugby (or football) player = "Get out of jail free card"?

Shark Daddy wrote:That article stresses the fact that the victim was an officer, but we do not know if Maitua knew he was an officer in this brawl. In fact it's implicitly suggested he didn't (and this would be a good defense anyway).
In previous news report, Constable Tim Allen said "What are you doing? I am a cop."
The reply? f-words.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/125.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.8
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14510
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Shark Daddy » Fri 06 Aug, 2004 10:02 pm

Antony wrote:
Shark Daddy wrote:Half a year for an assualt is very harsh if no permanent damage was inflicted, especially if this was a first-time offense.
So a rugby (or football) player = "Get out of jail free card"?

No, I'm just saying if the offender had a record as an upstanding citizen, half a year in jail is grossly overpunishing the man for a first-time offense, especially if the wounds inflicted were superficial.

Antony wrote:
Shark Daddy wrote:That article stresses the fact that the victim was an officer, but we do not know if Maitua knew he was an officer in this brawl. In fact it's implicitly suggested he didn't (and this would be a good defense anyway).
In previous news report, Constable Tim Allen said "What are you doing? I am a cop."
The reply? f-words.


Okay, I was unaware of that part. Assuming the officer followed proper procedure, that could be a problem for the rugby player.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8
Shark Daddy
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 11:19 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby keith » Sat 07 Aug, 2004 2:00 am

ya i can't bvelieve how easy hes gettin off. i don't care if your joe shmo off the street or tiger woods, or a rugby palyer, you should still get punished. Expecially for somethin like that.

Keith
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
KEITH
User avatar
keith
gold member
gold member
 
Posts: 687
Joined: Mon 02 Feb, 2004 11:49 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Postby Don_HH2K » Sat 07 Aug, 2004 8:13 am

keith wrote:ya i can't bvelieve how easy hes gettin off. i don't care if your joe shmo off the street or tiger woods, or a rugby palyer, you should still get punished. Expecially for somethin like that.

Keith


If the price is right (you know...),they can get away with it. I'm guessing that he probably had to (secretly) pay more than $1000.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Laptop: HP Compaq nx6325 - Turion 64 X2 @ 2GHz, 2GB DDR2, 100GB HD, ATI Radeon X300, 15" LCD, Seven Pro
Handheld: Palm Treo 650 - Intel PXA270 @ 312MHz, 10MB RAM, 32MB flash, 2.7" LCD, Palm OS 5.4
User avatar
Don_HH2K
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5112
Joined: Sun 09 May, 2004 3:59 pm

Postby Antony » Sat 07 Aug, 2004 8:18 am

AU$1000 is not a lot for a sport player.

Michael Jackson's bail was $3 million (USD).
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/125.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.8
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14510
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Mandrake » Sat 07 Aug, 2004 9:46 am

IMHO, there's no excuse for assaulting a police officer. If I'd have been the judge, he'd have
received a minimum 6 months imprisonment, as well as the $2000 fine, regardless of his
sporting career. If such a sentence harms his career in rugby, that's just tough luck.


I totally agree. He can't simply say 'I'm a rugby player, I can do whatever I want'. A $2000 fine is hardly a suitable punishment for physically assaulting a police officer. 6 months imprisonment would be a far more suitable punishment!
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040803 Firefox/0.9.3
Core i7 920 | ASUS P6T Deluxe v2 | 3TB+ HDD | 12GB Corsair DDR3 | Radeon 4890 Xfire | X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty | Logitech Z-5500 Speakers | Dell 3008WFP | Seven RC1
User avatar
Mandrake
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4193
Joined: Fri 13 Sep, 2002 6:35 am

Postby Shark Daddy » Sat 07 Aug, 2004 10:55 am

The fact that he's a rugby player has nothing to do with it. If you or I were in that situation, we'd get the same punishment (assuming you guys all have no criminal records... I certainly don't). The fact that he's rich does not mean his punishment should be more that the norm. In the case of MJ, his bail was set so high because he had the resources to escape prosecution, and his alleged crime was very severe.

A sentence will take into account whether it will destroy other aspects of your life. Maitua's attorney rightfully argued that his career as a rugby player meant he needed to train all the time, and imprisoning him for example (though this doesn't sound severe enough to warrant that anyway) would mean the government would be causing other side effects on his life. If I had a job the court might have to make accomodations for, they would probably do it. For example, let's say my invalid mother needs to be taken care of every day. If they imprison me, she croaks. The court would let me off, and perhaps increase the fine. Even if I didn't play sports.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8
Shark Daddy
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 11:19 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby Antony » Sat 07 Aug, 2004 10:41 pm

Shark Daddy wrote:The fact that he's a rugby player has nothing to do with it. If you or I were in that situation, we'd get the same punishment (assuming you guys all have no criminal records... I certainly don't). The fact that he's rich does not mean his punishment should be more that the norm. In the case of MJ, his bail was set so high because he had the resources to escape prosecution, and his alleged crime was very severe.
US Judges do admit that the bail of Michael Jackson is far more than the usual account, however they took into the account of Michael Jackson's wealth.

AU$1000 (or AU$2000 in total) is virtually for a rugby player.

Shark Daddy wrote:A sentence will take into account whether it will destroy other aspects of your life. Maitua's attorney rightfully argued that his career as a rugby player meant he needed to train all the time, and imprisoning him for example (though this doesn't sound severe enough to warrant that anyway) would mean the government would be causing other side effects on his life. If I had a job the court might have to make accomodations for, they would probably do it. For example, let's say my invalid mother needs to be taken care of every day. If they imprison me, she croaks. The court would let me off, and perhaps increase the fine. Even if I didn't play sports.
Take into account of whether if would destroy the aspect of a rugby player life?
Where's the justice?
AU$2000 can buy a license to punch a cop?
Being a rugby player = get out of jail free?
Because of the fame?

So, if during any protest/rally, anyone can simply pay AU$2000 to punch a cop, and no jail term?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/125.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.8
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14510
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Lorraine » Sat 07 Aug, 2004 11:26 pm

Don't forget that officer was off duty, I don't think it should count
as hitting a police officer the same as if he was on duty


Cops are never around when you need them.
They are always in the donut shops.

Some cops take advantage of people and I think it's about time
one got a good punch.

I got caught by a trap. I was turning right at the light, the light for the traffic was red and at a standstill, so I went in the bus lane before the curve, about 20 feet before the curve, maybe less, and I received a ticket for $138.00
It was a yield place to turn right and there wasn't any traffic either.
What a sham for money the lazy louts have.

When he handed me the ticket, I felt like poking him in the nose. So I know how the rugby guy felt, but instead I said to him, "you really are a bxstxxd, aren't you?" He replied: "It's not me, it's that guy sitting in the car with the radar."

Well forty people were trapped that day, it was a new bus lane, traffic was backed up for miles and no buses in the lane. One man refused to pay and they all got off. I had already paid mine, no refunds.
-Lorraine
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
User avatar
Lorraine
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1124
Joined: Mon 21 Apr, 2003 6:55 pm

Postby Shark Daddy » Sun 08 Aug, 2004 11:45 am

Antony wrote:US Judges do admit that the bail of Michael Jackson is far more than the usual account, however they took into the account of Michael Jackson's wealth.

AU$1000 (or AU$2000 in total) is virtually for a rugby player.


Note that all he did was hit a man that happened to be an (off-duty) officer. Micheal Jackson stands accused (again) of much more severe crimes. You're absolutely right that they take into account financial status. The reason is that MJ (or some other rich guy) could take his private jet down to Bangladesh and flee the law with all his money. Also to a much smaller degree, it's sort of like liberal taxation policies; rich people must pay more and poor people are given breaks.

Whether this is just or not is as two-sided a debate as liberalism versus conservatism.

Antony wrote:Take into account of whether if would destroy the aspect of a rugby player life?
Where's the justice?
AU$2000 can buy a license to punch a cop?
Being a rugby player = get out of jail free?
Because of the fame?

So, if during any protest/rally, anyone can simply pay AU$2000 to punch a cop, and no jail term?


Umm, no. Nobody said that. By that fallacious logic, you could assert that $20 000 000 (USD) is a license to sexually abuse a child. How did I come to that conclusion? Just ask MJ :twisted:

But also, these were just circumstances; if that officer were on-duty and in uniform, I wouldn't be surprised if the judge (or maybe the law requires it) treated the assault charge as an indictable offense. In this case, there was a huge brawl. And a man who happened to be there punched another man who happened to be there. End of story.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8
Shark Daddy
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 11:19 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby Antony » Mon 09 Aug, 2004 1:42 am

Shark Daddy wrote:Note that all he did was hit a man that happened to be an (off-duty) officer. Micheal Jackson stands accused (again) of much more severe crimes.
What? [sdt=3865]Michael Jackson is innocent![/sdt] Well, that's another matter.

Shark Daddy wrote:You're absolutely right that they take into account financial status.
And AU$2000 is too little for a rugby player.

Shark Daddy wrote:But also, these were just circumstances; if that officer were on-duty and in uniform, I wouldn't be surprised if the judge (or maybe the law requires it) treated the assault charge as an indictable offense. In this case, there was a huge brawl. And a man who happened to be there punched another man who happened to be there. End of story.
No, the story is not ended. So it only cost AU$2000 to punch a random guy? That's all? And no jail term simply the judge must keep rugby fans happy?

I am pretty sure US judge did not keep George Michael fans in 1998.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.8
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14510
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Shark Daddy » Mon 09 Aug, 2004 11:15 am

The reasoning is explained. You even underlined it. Anyway, I'm wondering. Is this Maitua guy a rugby star or just another player (nobody in their right mind follows that silly sport :D)?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8
Shark Daddy
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 11:19 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Next

Return to SillyDog701 Lounge

Who is online

Registered users: Google [Bot], James