Screenshot file formats?

For all tech/computer related or even internet related discussions not covered in other sections. Also iPad, iPhone, iPod and multimedia discussions.

Moderators: profman, Josh, Don_HH2K

Screenshot file formats?

Postby beanboy89 » Sun 16 Jan, 2005 2:08 pm

I have seen many screenshots here at SillyDog701, and all over the Internet. I have even cerated some screenshots myself and uploaded them to forums and webpages. I have seen JPG, PNG, GIF, along with some other formats in screenshots. I've used JPG, PNG, and GIF formats before, but haven't really thought about it until now. What are some advantages and disadvantages for each format of screenshots, if any; and what format do other members here use in saving a screenshot?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
User avatar
beanboy89
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1650
Joined: Sun 16 May, 2004 8:56 am

Re: Screenshot file formats?

Postby netdude21 » Sun 16 Jan, 2005 3:01 pm

The best screenshot file format I've seen and used is .jpg, plus it depends on the resolution you use. I prefer that you use 800 x 600 resolution if you're going to save the screenshots on the internet. Although you can use 640 x 480.


Hope this helps

Netdude21
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0
netdude21
new member
new member
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat 18 Sep, 2004 7:35 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Postby Andrew T. » Sun 16 Jan, 2005 4:00 pm

JPG, GIF, and PNG are by far the most popular image formats found on the web, since they are well-supported by browsers and are relatively small in file size.

JPG is a lossy file format; JPG screenshots are slightly worse in image quality than those saved in lossless formats, particularly when high compression settings are used. However, this doesn't always matter; this compression is offset by the small file sizes that can be obtained, and if you resize your screenshots (There is a stipulation, for example, that screenshots displayed in this website be no more than 550 pixels wide) you're obviously not going to get pixel-by-pixel-accurate quality anyway. JPG would be better suited to screenshots involving, say, gradients or photo-like compositions.

GIF and PNG are (usually) lossless file formats, so they are often superior in image quality, but larger in file size, than JPG. GIF is an older format, is better-supported by old browsers, and is capable of implementing animations. PNG is a newer and (in some ways) superior format; the format can handle more colors, and PNG files may be smaller in file size than equivalent GIFs. In a few cases (with simple screenshots involving very few colors, for example), GIF may be smaller.

My recommendations:
Use JPG if you intend to resize your screenshots or your screenshots have complex graphic designs or patterns as opposed to simple colors and patterns. Otherwise, use PNG. (or GIF if the screenshot is very simple.)
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0
User avatar
Andrew T.
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Fri 14 Mar, 2003 11:37 pm
Location: Somewhere beyond the sea

Postby Al » Sun 16 Jan, 2005 4:37 pm

I recommend PNG. PNG's is going to replace GIF's someday. GIF's only support up to 256 colours.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041108 Firefox/1.0
User of Firefox :ff: 3.0 on Windows XP
User avatar
Al
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1694
Joined: Fri 20 Dec, 2002 1:08 pm

Postby Antony » Sun 16 Jan, 2005 4:54 pm

PNG can be real large in file format. In similar graphic quality (JPEG and PNG), the file size of PNG can be scary, however, opensource supports tend to like PNG a lot.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.5.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.12
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14510
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Don_HH2K » Sun 16 Jan, 2005 8:31 pm

There's no real problem on the part of PNG except for the fact that they'll only go up to 256 colors, so it's not good if you want to take a desktop screenshot (unless you're using one of the old Win98 preloaded wallpapers maybe). I know there's PNG-24, but IE, which 85% of everybody uses, doesn't support PNG-24. However, that didn't stop me from using PNG-24 images for Donzilla screenshots..
BTW Antony, I found PNG-24 to be a bit smaller than JPEG for such screenshots.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (Donzilla/0.5)
Laptop: HP Compaq nx6325 - Turion 64 X2 @ 2GHz, 2GB DDR2, 100GB HD, ATI Radeon X300, 15" LCD, Seven Pro
Handheld: Palm Treo 650 - Intel PXA270 @ 312MHz, 10MB RAM, 32MB flash, 2.7" LCD, Palm OS 5.4
User avatar
Don_HH2K
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5112
Joined: Sun 09 May, 2004 3:59 pm

Postby Antony » Sun 16 Jan, 2005 9:02 pm

dluchini30 wrote:BTW Antony, I found PNG-24 to be a bit smaller than JPEG for such screenshots.
That's true in certain cases. With JPEG, you can specify the compression/picture quality. With low compression (high picture quality), the file size for JPEG (picture file) is generally a bit larger than PNG-24.

It all depends on how much detail you want to present, and how much loss in picture quality you can accept.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.5.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.12
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14510
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia


Return to General Computing and Tech

Who is online

Registered users: Google [Bot]