Netscape 8.0.3.1 retracted, revert back to 8.0.2

page 1, 2  next
You are here:  SillyDog701 > Message Centre > Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape > [sdt=9490]
SillyDog701 Forums
Author Message
DiGravioandSons
member

Joe
Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 40
Location: NJ USA
29 Jul, 2005 3:52 am Netscape 8.0.3.1 retracted, revert back to 8.0.2 [sdp=61286]  

Netscape has pulled 8.0.3.1 because of issues. They went back to 8.0.2 as offical download.

Subject changed from "Netscape8.0.3 PULLED 8.0.2 Offical Download" by Antony - 29.7.2005

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050603 Netscape/8.0.2
Back to top profile
Antony
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jun 2002
Posts: 12751
Location: Sydney, Australia
29 Jul, 2005 4:23 am Re: Netscape8.0.3 PULLED 8.0.2 Offical Download [sdp=61289]  

DiGravioandSons wrote:
Netscape has pulled 8.0.3.1 because of issues. They went back to 8.0.2 as offical download.
Thanks.

Please see this post.

According to Mr. Jay Garcia,
8.0.3.1 was pulled until some critical issues are fixed and a patch becomes available.
(reference)


At time of posting, no further explanation was given by either Netscape or Mr. Jay Garcia.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/412.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/412.2

Back to top profile website
MJR
member


Joined: 12 Apr 2004
Posts: 46
Location: Sydney, Australia
29 Jul, 2005 7:14 am [sdp=61292]  

This is not good. Makes one think v8.0.3.1 was a slapdash release.
But then, who knows? I could be wrong.

v8.0.2 was a real improvement over previous betas except that it crashes almost always from 11pm onwards. Very strange. At other times, it's stable.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050603 Netscape/8.0.2

\m/(>.<)\m/
Back to top profile
Antony
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jun 2002
Posts: 12751
Location: Sydney, Australia
29 Jul, 2005 7:33 am [sdp=61294]  

MJR wrote:
This is not good. Makes one think v8.0.3.1 was a slapdash release.
But then, who knows? I could be wrong.

v8.0.2 was a real improvement over previous betas except that it crashes almost always from 11pm onwards. Very strange. At other times, it's stable.
Let's wait for a stable release.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/412.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/412.2

Back to top profile website
Antony
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jun 2002
Posts: 12751
Location: Sydney, Australia
29 Jul, 2005 8:46 am [sdp=61299]  

From NetscapeProduct,
8.0.3.1 was pulled temporarily due to a bug effecting downloading for some users. We've isolated the problem and a patch will be issued shortly.

Thanks for your patience.

-Netscape Product


(Msg # 2612.1)

screenshot:


UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/412.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/412.2

Back to top profile website
Fulvio
Moderator


Joined: 19 Jun 2002
Posts: 11048
29 Jul, 2005 8:54 am [sdp=61301]  

I have been using 8.0.3.1 very little, and, it has worked better than earlier versions, for me (fewer of those dreadful tabs!).
But it was obvious that something was wrong when they had, originally, said that four issues where addressed (probably the never seen 8.0.3), which were pared down to two with 8.0.3.1. This is incredibly sloppy.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Firejackal/1.0.6

"I've got a very poor sense of direction. I keep forgetting which way is forwards."
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, 3.0.15 regular, 3.5.5 regular and portable , TB2.0.0.23, Flock2.5.2, IE8.0, SM2.0, Google Chrome2.0.x, Safari4.0.4, Zone Alarm; AVG9.0, JRE1.6_17
Back to top profile
Ramona
Moderator


Joined: 19 Jun 2002
Posts: 2370
Location: Midwest USA
30 Jul, 2005 3:16 pm There was a Secunia Security Advisory on This As Follows: [sdp=61383]  

TITLE:
Netscape Multiple Vulnerabilities
Quote:

SECUNIA ADVISORY ID:
SA16185

VERIFY ADVISORY:
http://secunia.com/advisories/16185/

CRITICAL:
Highly critical

IMPACT:
System access

WHERE:
>From remote

SOFTWARE:
Netscape 8.x
http://secunia.com/product/5134/

DESCRIPTION:
Some vulnerabilities have been reported in Netscape, where some have
unknown impacts and others can be exploited by malicious people to
compromise a user's system.

For more information, see vulnerabilities #7 and #9:
SA16043

SOLUTION:
Update to version 8.0.3.1.
http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/download/default.jsp

OTHER REFERENCES:
SA16043:
http://secunia.com/advisories/16043/


UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6 (ax)
Back to top profile
Fulvio
Moderator


Joined: 19 Jun 2002
Posts: 11048
30 Jul, 2005 7:35 pm [sdp=61392]  

FYI: The Secunia link is to the Netscape site, which offers 8.0.2.
Now, what is the real story?

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Webhyena/1.0.6

"I've got a very poor sense of direction. I keep forgetting which way is forwards."
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, 3.0.15 regular, 3.5.5 regular and portable , TB2.0.0.23, Flock2.5.2, IE8.0, SM2.0, Google Chrome2.0.x, Safari4.0.4, Zone Alarm; AVG9.0, JRE1.6_17
Back to top profile
Ramona
Moderator


Joined: 19 Jun 2002
Posts: 2370
Location: Midwest USA
30 Jul, 2005 9:13 pm [sdp=61397]  

The Secunia Security Advisory was issued on July 26, and the Netscape Product Announcement is dated July 29....


Edited to remove poor choice of words. My bad! Rolling Eyes

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6 (ax)


Last edited by Ramona on 31 Jul, 2005 12:56 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top profile
Alice
Mozilla Champion

Alice Wyman
Joined: 21 Jul 2002
Posts: 1787
31 Jul, 2005 5:42 am [sdp=61411]  

Ramona wrote:
I imagine that Secunia had no clue that Netscape would ask users to revert back to 8.0.2 from 8.0.3.1.
Where did you see that?

AFAIK users who have already installed 8.0.3.1 and who are not having problems should stay with 8.0.3.1 since it is MORE secure than 8.0.2.

Jay Garcia has posted additional information, here:
Netscape's Netscape Browser Forum
Quote:
If you and others had been following the discussions and posts by several users complaining about not being able to download using 8.0.3.1 then you would understand WHY 8.0.3.1 was pulled, we will NOT continue to provide this version. And I DID announce it but not in the announcements section. I also provided a link to the archives so users not happy with 8.0.3.1 can download a previous version until this is patched and re-spun. The download problem is universal enough to warrant a re-spin, but not experienced by "some" users. I can't d'load using 8.0.3.1 either.
<snip>
_________
Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion
UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org


[Edit by profman: Used BBCode to shorten long URL, 7/31/2005.]

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050728

Last edited by Alice on 31 Jul, 2005 5:56 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top profile website
Ramona
Moderator


Joined: 19 Jun 2002
Posts: 2370
Location: Midwest USA
31 Jul, 2005 12:51 pm [sdp=61428]  

Alice wrote:
Ramona wrote:

I imagine that Secunia had no clue that Netscape would ask users to revert back to 8.0.2 from 8.0.3.1.


Where did you see that?


Oh Lord! O.K., perhaps a poor choice of words. However, if I couldn't download, I sure as heck would be "reverting" to an earlier version...

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6 (ax)

Back to top profile
Alice
Mozilla Champion

Alice Wyman
Joined: 21 Jul 2002
Posts: 1787
31 Jul, 2005 3:29 pm [sdp=61437]  

I just wanted to clarify that Netscape did not advise 8.0.3.1 users to revert to 8.0.2, although users having download problems may wish to do so.

Alternately, those users having problems downloading with Netscape 8.0.3.1 may wish to switch to another browser in the interim, if worried about the security issues in Netscape 8.0.2. I would suggest Firefox 1.0.6.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050728
Back to top profile website
Antony
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jun 2002
Posts: 12751
Location: Sydney, Australia
01 Aug, 2005 5:45 am [sdp=61461]  

Not to join this "revert" wording issue, but I would like to simply explain it. And I have more interesting thing to post.

Alice wrote:
Ramona wrote:
I imagine that Secunia had no clue that Netscape would ask users to revert back to 8.0.2 from 8.0.3.1.
Where did you see that?
I changed the original topic of this thread "Netscape8.0.3 PULLED 8.0.2 Offical Download" to "Netscape 8.0.3.1 retracted, revert back to 8.0.2".
Netscape did revert back the offering to 8.0.2.
Perhaps, the word "revert" was from SillyDog701?

Well, thanks for the message quote, let's see what Mr Garcia said.


Firstly, Mr Jay Garcia said, (he) DID announce it but not in the announcements section.
Was he expecting people to read every post he made? Gee.

Secondly, Netscape 8.0.3.1 was retracted and the offering was reverted back to 8.0.2 was that simply because our good friend, Mr Jay Garcia, who had problem with Netscape 8.0.3.1?

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/412.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/412.2

Back to top profile website
Alice
Mozilla Champion

Alice Wyman
Joined: 21 Jul 2002
Posts: 1787
01 Aug, 2005 10:37 am [sdp=61467]  

Antony wrote:
I changed the original topic of this thread "Netscape8.0.3 PULLED 8.0.2 Offical Download" to "Netscape 8.0.3.1 retracted, revert back to 8.0.2".
Netscape did revert back the offering to 8.0.2.
Perhaps, the word "revert" was from SillyDog701?


Yes, you're the culprit, Antony Wink

As to your issues with Jay Garcia............. no comment.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050728

Last edited by Alice on 01 Aug, 2005 10:39 am; edited once(1)
Back to top profile website
Antony
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jun 2002
Posts: 12751
Location: Sydney, Australia
01 Aug, 2005 5:15 pm [sdp=61480]  

Alice wrote:
Yes, you're the culprit, Antony Wink
Me? I did not say Netscape asked users to revert back to 8.0.2.

Alice wrote:
As to your issues with Jay Garcia............. no comment.
Oh, I have no issues with Mr Garcia, except I don't understand why such demanding (of everybody to read his every single post) was used in Netscape's supporting forum, and making people feel that Netscape 8.0.3.1 was pulled because it did not work for him.



UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/412.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/412.2

Back to top profile website
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index > Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape All times are CST (GMT -6)
page 1 of 2 page 1, 2  next
To add your questions, comments, and for more features and more, please join SillyDog701 Message Centre. It's free! This is SillyDog 701 Message Centre (SD701 Forums).

Apple iTunes iTunes

*Search | FAQ | Rules and Policies | MozInfo701 - Mozilla Information Centre | SD701 Open Directory | Message Board Map | download Netscape