| SillyDog701 Forums |
| Author |
Message |
beanboy89


Joined: 16 May 2004 Posts: 1447
|
27 Sep, 2006 4:28 pm Different loading of Forum Index |
[sdp=77673] |
|
Today, I noticed that the forum index of the Message Centre loads differently that it did previously. Before, the forum index would load the entire page in order, from top to bottom. Now I notice that the bottom "Free Music" table loads first, then slides to the bottom of the page as the links to the forums load or appear to slide in from the right.
I assume this is by design, but the current implementation seems a bit jumpy for me. Anyone else notice this?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1b2) Gecko/20060821 SeaMonkey/1.1a
... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Don_HH2K


Joined: 09 May 2004 Posts: 4575
|
27 Sep, 2006 4:35 pm |
[sdp=77676] |
|
I noticed this too. I'm not too fond of the design, and I have a feeling it'll break some older browsers. For some reason I can't log in with Netscape 4, so I can't try it right now.
Furthermore, my Master Password entry dialog will come up before the forums load, which make things look a bit weird.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2 x64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060917 Firefox/1.5.0.7 (mmoy CE K8M-X19)
Laptop: Turion 64 X2 @ 2GHz, 2GB PC5300, 100GB HD, Radeon X300, 15" LCD, Vista Ultimate x64
Web server: P2 @ 233MHz, 280MB PC66, 20GB HD, 13.3" LCD, Windows Server 2003 x86
XLink / VPN server: MIPS32 @ 216MHz, 16MB PC100, 4MB flash, DD-WRT v24 SP1 mipsel |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pu7o


Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 1956 Location: Portugal
|
27 Sep, 2006 5:26 pm |
[sdp=77682] |
|
Interesting effect I get with Safari:
SD701 Index on Safari (encoded with H.264, QuickTime, VLC, MPlayer or FFDShow recommended).
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; pt-pt) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Don_HH2K


Joined: 09 May 2004 Posts: 4575
|
27 Sep, 2006 6:08 pm |
[sdp=77684] |
|
Ghosting of the forum logo halfway across the page is definitely an interesting effect.
Here's my version. (encoded with WMV9 screen profile, which isn't one of the standardized profiles, so this probably won't run on Flip4Mac or anything)
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2 x64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060917 Firefox/1.5.0.7 (mmoy CE K8M-X19)
Laptop: Turion 64 X2 @ 2GHz, 2GB PC5300, 100GB HD, Radeon X300, 15" LCD, Vista Ultimate x64
Web server: P2 @ 233MHz, 280MB PC66, 20GB HD, 13.3" LCD, Windows Server 2003 x86
XLink / VPN server: MIPS32 @ 216MHz, 16MB PC100, 4MB flash, DD-WRT v24 SP1 mipsel |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
beanboy89


Joined: 16 May 2004 Posts: 1447
|
27 Sep, 2006 7:10 pm |
[sdp=77685] |
|
And here's my take on it. (encoded with Windows Media Video 9)
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1b2) Gecko/20060821 SeaMonkey/1.1a
... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antony


Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 12076
|
27 Sep, 2006 7:25 pm |
[sdp=77686] |
|
Congratulations on acquiring Snapz X Pro.
Snapz X Pro is not a freeware.
| Don_HH2K wrote: | I have a feeling it'll break some older browsers. | It's more likely to be broken in some unethical browsers.
| Don_HH2K wrote: | Here's my version. (encoded with WMV9 screen profile, which isn't one of the standardized profiles, so this probably won't run on Flip4Mac or anything) | It does not even work with Microsoft's very own Windows Media Player.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antony


Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 12076
|
27 Sep, 2006 7:32 pm Re: Different loading of Forum Index |
[sdp=77687] |
|
| beanboy89 wrote: | I assume this is by design, but the current implementation seems a bit jumpy for me. Anyone else notice this? | Sorry for the jumpy. I will see if I can remove the jumpy thing.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pu7o


Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 1956 Location: Portugal
|
27 Sep, 2006 7:50 pm |
[sdp=77688] |
|
| Antony wrote: | Congratulations on acquiring Snapz X Pro.
Snapz X Pro is not a freeware. | You're right, it's not freeware, it's a free 30-day trial, and my trial isn't over yet, specially when it only counts the days where I actually use the thing. By the way, the program is called "Snapz Pro X", not "Snapz X Pro" 
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; pt-pt) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3 Last edited by Pu7o on 27 Sep, 2006 7:54 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Don_HH2K


Joined: 09 May 2004 Posts: 4575
|
27 Sep, 2006 8:40 pm |
[sdp=77689] |
|
| Antony wrote: |  | Don_HH2K wrote: | Here's my version. (encoded with WMV9 screen profile, which isn't one of the standardized profiles, so this probably won't run on Flip4Mac or anything) | It does not even work with Microsoft's very own Windows Media Player. |
What version? It doesn't work on the Mac one, that's too old.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2 x64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060917 Firefox/1.5.0.7 (mmoy CE K8M-X19)
Laptop: Turion 64 X2 @ 2GHz, 2GB PC5300, 100GB HD, Radeon X300, 15" LCD, Vista Ultimate x64
Web server: P2 @ 233MHz, 280MB PC66, 20GB HD, 13.3" LCD, Windows Server 2003 x86
XLink / VPN server: MIPS32 @ 216MHz, 16MB PC100, 4MB flash, DD-WRT v24 SP1 mipsel |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antony


Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 12076
|
27 Sep, 2006 9:28 pm |
[sdp=77691] |
|
| Don_HH2K wrote: | What version? It doesn't work on the Mac one, that's too old. | Old? Geez, you are really into the latest of everything.
Not even on Microsoft's own Windows Media Player on Windows, if you want to know.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/418.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
beanboy89


Joined: 16 May 2004 Posts: 1447
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
profman


Joined: 11 Sep 2002 Posts: 1451
|
27 Sep, 2006 11:17 pm |
[sdp=77694] |
|
I don't care for the jumpy effect (Mozilla 1.7.13), but I do not consider it a major problem.
[Edit: Seems better when I re-checked it just now.]
All the videos seems to work for me.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Don_HH2K


Joined: 09 May 2004 Posts: 4575
|
28 Sep, 2006 4:28 am |
[sdp=77698] |
|
| Antony wrote: |  | Don_HH2K wrote: | What version? It doesn't work on the Mac one, that's too old. | Old? Geez, you are really into the latest of everything.
Not even on Microsoft's own Windows Media Player on Windows, if you want to know. |
What's wrong with living on the bleeding edge a bit, if you can output a file a mere 54k at 800x600 resolution, and have it look nice?
Update your codec package, you're probably using the one that came with XP. (Get the latest. )
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2 x64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060917 Firefox/1.5.0.7 (mmoy CE K8M-X19)
Laptop: Turion 64 X2 @ 2GHz, 2GB PC5300, 100GB HD, Radeon X300, 15" LCD, Vista Ultimate x64
Web server: P2 @ 233MHz, 280MB PC66, 20GB HD, 13.3" LCD, Windows Server 2003 x86
XLink / VPN server: MIPS32 @ 216MHz, 16MB PC100, 4MB flash, DD-WRT v24 SP1 mipsel |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antony


Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 12076
|
28 Sep, 2006 4:45 am |
[sdp=77699] |
|
This is the official video clip showing the new effects used in SillyDog701 Message Centre front door. It's the sharpest video clip so far.

(click above image to watch the video clip)
The video clip is encoded with state-of-the-art video codec H.264 , which delivers stunning quality at remarkably low data rates. QuickTime Player 7 (free) is recommended for watching the video.
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/418.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Don_HH2K


Joined: 09 May 2004 Posts: 4575
|
28 Sep, 2006 4:48 am |
[sdp=77700] |
|
| Antony wrote: | It's the sharpest video clip so far. |
How do you know that if you can't watch mine?
Presenting the H.264 clip.
Presenting the Windows Media 9 Screen clip, nearly 75% smaller. Direct link , as resizing to 550x413 would cause it to blur. I forgot to mention, the H.264 is only 512x288, while the WMV9 Screen is 800x600.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2 x64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060917 Firefox/1.5.0.7 (mmoy CE K8M-X19)
Laptop: Turion 64 X2 @ 2GHz, 2GB PC5300, 100GB HD, Radeon X300, 15" LCD, Vista Ultimate x64
Web server: P2 @ 233MHz, 280MB PC66, 20GB HD, 13.3" LCD, Windows Server 2003 x86
XLink / VPN server: MIPS32 @ 216MHz, 16MB PC100, 4MB flash, DD-WRT v24 SP1 mipsel Last edited by Don_HH2K on 28 Sep, 2006 4:54 am; edited once(1) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|