Is Google Mail... Creep Mail????

You are here:  SillyDog701 > Message Centre > SillyDog701 Lounge > [sdt=10274]
SillyDog701 Forums
Author Message
James
diamond member


Joined: 12 Jul 2002
Posts: 1747
21 Nov, 2005 11:18 pm Is Google Mail... Creep Mail???? [sdp=66547]  

http://gmail-is-too-creepy.com/

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5

James
It's later than you think.

Firefox 3.5.3, IE 8
Back to top profile
DJGM
diamond member


Joined: 19 Jun 2002
Posts: 4371
Location: Manchester, England, UK
21 Nov, 2005 11:30 pm [sdp=66548]  

Three letters to best describe that article . . . F U D . . .

It's a typical FUD filled article bashing Gmail, just because it's a service offered by a big company.

The only people who'd have such issues with alleged Gmail privacy violations, are those might
have something to hide. I use a Gmail account as my main e-mail address for all my personal
e-mails, while I use my sillydog.org e-mail account for all other important e-mails.

(I use a HoTMaiL account for when I fill in an online form that asks for an e-mail address.)

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915

SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
Back to top profile website
James
diamond member


Joined: 12 Jul 2002
Posts: 1747
21 Nov, 2005 11:33 pm [sdp=66549]  

Most likely... but... did you read the entire article? Do you suppose there is some truth in it?

I understand that people who have something to hide would perhaps have issues... but what about privacy... what about profiles that are created from this incredible data base and then sold to whomever? I'm not sure I particularly like that idea. Fortunately I never invested much into Google G-mail and it may be just as well. On the other hand, you could (and most likely are) be right. Confused

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5

James
It's later than you think.

Firefox 3.5.3, IE 8
Back to top profile
Antony
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jun 2002
Posts: 12754
Location: Sydney, Australia
21 Nov, 2005 11:36 pm [sdp=66550]  

DJGM wrote:
Three letters to best describe that article . . . F U D . . .

It's a typical FUD filled article bashing Gmail, just because it's a service offered by a big company.
It's not much different to those Apple bashers...

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/416.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/416.12

Back to top profile website
DJGM
diamond member


Joined: 19 Jun 2002
Posts: 4371
Location: Manchester, England, UK
22 Nov, 2005 12:11 am [sdp=66552]  

Indeed . . . Google bashers, Apple bashers, Microsoft bashers . . . etc . . .

Any major multinational commercial organization will have it's bashers, not only tech ones.

Even the big retailers, such as Wal-Mart, get bashed for being big and successful . . .

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915

SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
Back to top profile website
Antony
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jun 2002
Posts: 12754
Location: Sydney, Australia
22 Nov, 2005 12:24 am [sdp=66554]  

DJGM wrote:
Indeed . . . Google bashers, Apple bashers, Microsoft bashers . . . etc . . .

Any major multinational commercial organization will have it's bashers, not only tech ones.

Even the big retailers, such as Wal-Mart, get bashed for being big and successful . . .
Not just commercial organisations, but also some websites Wink
And, not just bashers, also people are trying to make a fortune by suing big (and small) companies. This suing culture is more noticeable in America. And you can blame those people for all the unnecessary sings such as "Warning: hot water may be hot" in nursing homes.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/416.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/416.12

Back to top profile website
Ron Williams
BANNED


Joined: 25 Nov 2003
Posts: 844
Location: Cambridge, Maryland
22 Nov, 2005 1:50 am [sdp=66556]  

DJGM wrote:
Even the big retailers, such as Wal-Mart, get bashed for being big and successful . . .


Walmart is just horrible. There cheep, but that comes at a price. Rubbermaid used to be huge, but they refused to lower there price and walmart quit buying from them for years, then when they started buying again rubbermaid was near bankrupcy.

Walmart also encourages the use of outsourcing that is leaching from our economy.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 Firefox/1.0.7 (ax)
Back to top profile
James
diamond member


Joined: 12 Jul 2002
Posts: 1747
22 Nov, 2005 7:52 am [sdp=66563]  

Okay! I'm convinced. Mea culpa.

(but it was sort of intriguing) Razz

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5

James
It's later than you think.

Firefox 3.5.3, IE 8
Back to top profile
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index > SillyDog701 Lounge All times are CST (GMT -6)
page 1 of 1
To add your questions, comments, and for more features and more, please join SillyDog701 Message Centre. It's free! This is SillyDog 701 Message Centre (SD701 Forums).

The Cat in The Hat (audio book) iTunes

*Search | FAQ | Rules and Policies | MozInfo701 - Mozilla Information Centre | SD701 Open Directory | Message Board Map | download Netscape