| SillyDog701 Forums |
| Author |
Message |
Antony
Joined: 18 Jun 2002
Posts: 11712
|
 19 Jan, 2006 5:17 pm SillyDog701 defamed by Ron Williams |
[sdp=69077] |
|
SillyDog701 is saddened to announce that we learnt that Mr Ronnie Williams II decided to defame SillyDog701 by purchasing following three domain names.
When Antony asked him if he bought holycowsucks counterparts as well?
Mr Ronnie Williams II threatened back, | Quote: |  you see, i have legal trademark over the holycow network names, so you taking there names and naming "sucks" at the end might just end up a legal suit
and since ronsnexus is part of the holycownetwork site........so using that might get another legal suit... |
A whois database shows Ronnie Williams bought the domain name(s) on 19-Jan-2006 06:46:44 UTC.
A screenshot of whois record taken just few minutes prior to this post is available here.
Mr Ronnie Williams has previously threatened to have SillyDog701 server confiscated by FBI, based on his wrong accusation. He apologised 16 days later.
SillyDog701 would like to seek public support on this unwarranted assault, any advise welcome.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/417.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/417.8
|
|
| Back to top |
  |
 |
Ron Williams
Joined: 25 Nov 2003
Posts: 844
Location: Cambridge, Maryland
|
| 19 Jan, 2006 9:40 pm |
[sdp=69094] |
|
Antony,
Whether you have a problem with me buying these domains or not, there's nothing you can do. The reason is you don't police your intelectual property. Take a look at http://www.sillydog701.com. However I do.......
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
James
Joined: 12 Jul 2002
Posts: 1386
|
| 19 Jan, 2006 10:08 pm |
[sdp=69097] |
|
Why did you do this? Unless you have a very good reason for your actions, I will be forced to boycott your sites. It's understood that Antony founded SillyDog and for you to attempt to wrest control of his "intellectual property" as you state, is little more than a despicable and juvenile thing to do. So, let's hear your reasons for your actions and we as a community will judge for ourselves. 
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20051012 Netscape/8.0.4
James
Firefox 2.0.0.14, Opera 9.27, IE 7
"It's later than you think." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ron Williams
Joined: 25 Nov 2003
Posts: 844
Location: Cambridge, Maryland
|
| 19 Jan, 2006 11:00 pm |
[sdp=69103] |
|
I actually did this not to put anything on that site, however the reason I did it was to see what antony would do in response to this. I guess you could say, I wanted to add fuel to the fire. I'm tired of my posts being deleted and Antony's constant claim that anyone who mentions something bad about apple is an apple basher.
What angered me is when I made reference to this article. I did not claim that iTunes was spytunes, I just stated that a "storm" of users had labeled iTunes this.
I did have second thoughts regarding the purchase, but why should I hush my feelings? I've tried to privately handle issues regarding posts. You can only take things for so long.
A post regarding an iPod being smashed was sent to underground due to Antony not liking it. And DJGM locked it before anyone could reply. When I asked DJGM for a reason, I never got a response. You can see the message I sent to DJGM here.
That's just one thing, then there was the iBoxer post. The first reply was by TK19 and to me, he seemed to be unhappy with the post there as he made a statement that was not possitive "what the f***" clearly, everyone can figure what the f-word is. Then Andrew T. said they belonged in his "most ludicrous inventions file". So when I said "And if this were e-mail, It would be deleted.......", antony asked "What are you suggesting?", I said "Maybe the same be done to this topic?". See here for that conversation. To me, that item and the way that it was presented (on a person) is ignorant. Aren't underwear to be worn under clothes, notice the UNDER.
Don't forget the "bleedingly obvious" statement regarding admin also known as Antony by Jarrad/Mandrake. Antony NEVER admited he was admin, however it's pretty obvious he is.
I have no care for the intellectual property here at SD701, it's not worth anything to me.
And I'll admit, it is juvenile, but if I use the domains, they will only be to show what happens here, IE the truth regarding the extreme censorship. It's nearly as bad as china's censorship.
Sorry if you feel you have to boycott my websites, but if you choose to, it's your choice. Don't bring don's site into this, since I do host and own the domain for it. He had no prior knowledge regarding my purchase of the SDsucks.com/.net/.org domains.
James, At least your decent about this ask first then judge...even if you disagree with me.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
James
Joined: 12 Jul 2002
Posts: 1386
|
| 19 Jan, 2006 11:33 pm |
[sdp=69104] |
|
I just don't understand the need to fight. We're a community.. almost a sort of family... aren't we? I've been coming here since 2002 (and even before that I was going to the older site) to ask my questions, get help in configuring my browsers, in turn help my wife and friends, and even on rare occasions try to give some help to someone here myself. I think I would feel lost without this community's support. 
UserAgent: Opera/9.0 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en)
James
Firefox 2.0.0.14, Opera 9.27, IE 7
"It's later than you think." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Antony
Joined: 18 Jun 2002
Posts: 11712
|
| 19 Jan, 2006 11:36 pm |
[sdp=69105] |
|
| Ron Williams wrote: | I actually did this not to put anything on that site, however the reason I did it was to see what antony would do in response to this. I guess you could say, I wanted to add fuel to the fire. I'm tired of my posts being deleted and Antony's constant claim that anyone who mentions something bad about apple is an apple basher.
What angered me is when I made reference to this article. I did not claim that iTunes was spytunes, I just stated that a "storm" of users had labeled iTunes this.
I did have second thoughts regarding the purchase, but why should I hush my feelings? I've tried to privately handle issues regarding posts. You can only take things for so long.
A post regarding an iPod being smashed was sent to underground due to Antony not liking it. And DJGM locked it before anyone could reply. When I asked DJGM for a reason, I never got a response. You can see the message I sent to DJGM here.
That's just one thing, then there was the iBoxer post. The first reply was by TK19 and to me, he seemed to be unhappy with the post there as he made a statement that was not possitive "what the f***" clearly, everyone can figure what the f-word is. Then Andrew T. said they belonged in his "most ludicrous inventions file". So when I said "And if this were e-mail, It would be deleted.......", antony asked "What are you suggesting?", I said "Maybe the same be done to this topic?". See here for that conversation. To me, that item and the way that it was presented (on a person) is ignorant. Aren't underwear to be worn under clothes, notice the UNDER.
Don't forget the "bleedingly obvious" statement regarding admin also known as Antony by Jarrad/Mandrake. Antony NEVER admited he was admin, however it's pretty obvious he is.
I have no care for the intellectual property here at SD701, it's not worth anything to me.
And I'll admit, it is juvenile, but if I use the domains, they will only be to show what happens here, IE the truth regarding the extreme censorship. It's nearly as bad as china's censorship.
Sorry if you feel you have to boycott my websites, but if you choose to, it's your choice. Don't bring don's site into this, since I do host and own the domain for it. He had no prior knowledge regarding my purchase of the SDsucks.com/.net/.org domains.
James, At least your decent about this ask first then judge...even if you disagree with me. |
Just to add a few words to this.
| Ron Williams wrote: | | What angered me is when I made reference to this article. I did not claim that iTunes was spytunes, I just stated that a "storm" of users had labeled iTunes this. |
Did you?
Allow me to recall what you said,
“Well, let's see. Most users have reasons to not use iTMS. Let's hear them.
Well I have two.
First is, it's slow.
Second, Spytunes”
The post is available here. Please be aware, you made that post after Apple has addressed the concern.
The other post is available here.
What do the three defaming domains have anything to do with admin and Antony accounts in SillyDog701?
What do the three defaming domains have to do with iBoxer or how underwear should be worn? Ignorant? So manufacturers can't advertise underwear with people wearing it?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/417.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/417.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ron Williams
Joined: 25 Nov 2003
Posts: 844
Location: Cambridge, Maryland
|
| 20 Jan, 2006 7:44 am |
[sdp=69128] |
|
| Antony wrote: | | Ron Williams wrote: | I actually did this not to put anything on that site, however the reason I did it was to see what antony would do in response to this. I guess you could say, I wanted to add fuel to the fire. I'm tired of my posts being deleted and Antony's constant claim that anyone who mentions something bad about apple is an apple basher.
What angered me is when I made reference to this article. I did not claim that iTunes was spytunes, I just stated that a "storm" of users had labeled iTunes this.
I did have second thoughts regarding the purchase, but why should I hush my feelings? I've tried to privately handle issues regarding posts. You can only take things for so long.
A post regarding an iPod being smashed was sent to underground due to Antony not liking it. And DJGM locked it before anyone could reply. When I asked DJGM for a reason, I never got a response. You can see the message I sent to DJGM here.
That's just one thing, then there was the iBoxer post. The first reply was by TK19 and to me, he seemed to be unhappy with the post there as he made a statement that was not possitive "what the f***" clearly, everyone can figure what the f-word is. Then Andrew T. said they belonged in his "most ludicrous inventions file". So when I said "And if this were e-mail, It would be deleted.......", antony asked "What are you suggesting?", I said "Maybe the same be done to this topic?". See here for that conversation. To me, that item and the way that it was presented (on a person) is ignorant. Aren't underwear to be worn under clothes, notice the UNDER.
Don't forget the "bleedingly obvious" statement regarding admin also known as Antony by Jarrad/Mandrake. Antony NEVER admited he was admin, however it's pretty obvious he is.
I have no care for the intellectual property here at SD701, it's not worth anything to me.
And I'll admit, it is juvenile, but if I use the domains, they will only be to show what happens here, IE the truth regarding the extreme censorship. It's nearly as bad as china's censorship.
Sorry if you feel you have to boycott my websites, but if you choose to, it's your choice. Don't bring don's site into this, since I do host and own the domain for it. He had no prior knowledge regarding my purchase of the SDsucks.com/.net/.org domains.
James, At least your decent about this ask first then judge...even if you disagree with me. |
Just to add a few words to this.
| Ron Williams wrote: | | What angered me is when I made reference to this article. I did not claim that iTunes was spytunes, I just stated that a "storm" of users had labeled iTunes this. |
Did you?
Allow me to recall what you said,
“Well, let's see. Most users have reasons to not use iTMS. Let's hear them.
Well I have two.
First is, it's slow.
Second, Spytunes” |
And your point? I still made mention to that article. And I asked why people don't use it, nothing wrong with that. Just like if a mac user were to change from Mac to Windows, they would ask the goods and bads for both.
| Antony wrote: | | What do the three defaming domains have anything to do with admin and Antony accounts in SillyDog701? |
It has to do with them because it shows you lied about that what prevents you from lieing about other things?
| Antony wrote: | | What do the three defaming domains have to do with iBoxer or how underwear should be worn? Ignorant? So manufacturers can't advertise underwear with people wearing it? |
It shows that you can't tolerate other peoples opinions and shows why I would be frustrated/angry and purchase the domains. Actions speak louder than words, clearly there you do not accept my opinion. It was my opinion that the topic should be deleted, but you called it "arrogance" since it was mac related and it's infathomable to you that people might not like seeing some guy wearing underwear. I think it's obvious to most people how you wear the iBoxers before they made the ad with the guy. Honestly, I think it is wrong the way that advertisement is done, it's called underwear.........not overwear, or underwear that you can wear alone as an outfit if it's and advertisement.
****Re-inserted by Ronnie after deletion by Mandrake.
*****Re-inserted by Ron after deletion by unknown person, assumed to be Mandrake.
******Re-inserted by Ron after deletion by unknown person, assumed to be Mandrake.
*******Re-inserted after topic was locked. Unknown person deleted my post, assumed to be mandrake after his comments.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Antony
Joined: 18 Jun 2002
Posts: 11712
|
| 20 Jan, 2006 8:02 am |
[sdp=69132] |
|
SillyDog701 is regret to report Mr Ronnie Williams II is leaving us.
(Some of Mr Ronnie Williams II's latest posts showing extreme anger were removed.)
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/417.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/417.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Antony
Joined: 18 Jun 2002
Posts: 11712
|
| 09 Mar, 2006 3:16 am Ronnie Williams II defames SD701, still. |
[sdp=71288] |
|
It appeared that Mr Ronnie Williams II still have strong anger against SillyDog701 even after he left us in January.
Kindly follow the steps, go to http://www.alexa.com/ and type http://sillydog.org/ in the search box. Then you should see this Alexa result page:
Someone posted,
Who wrote that?
Simply scroll down that page, and click the link See all 6 Reviews on Amazon.com..., and you will see following screenshot:
It's obviously the person who bought those insulting domains wrote that.
By the way, my dictionary says there's no such word as “closeminded”, but the word “open-minded” is listed.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/417.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/417.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Search
Log in
Search | FAQ | Rules and Policies
| MozInfo701 - Mozilla Information Centre
| SD701 Open Directory
| Message Board Map
| download Netscape
