Thunderbrowse or who needs a browsers?

You are here:  SillyDog701 > Message Centre > Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape > [sdt=14936]
SillyDog701 Forums

on
on
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Delete
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Delete
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 0

Author Message
Fulvio
Moderator


Joined: 19 Jun 2002
Posts: 11048
31 Jul, 2008 9:27 am Thunderbrowse or who needs a browsers? [sdp=93056]  

Take a look at this addon . Right click/copy and paste is not working for me, but it allows me to browse from my mail client, and open links in it. I may not care for it, but, it sure is intriguing, especially for a minimalist!

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080708 Lightning/0.8 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 ThunderBrowse/3.2.1.8

"I've got a very poor sense of direction. I keep forgetting which way is forwards."
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, 3.0.15 regular, 3.5.5 regular and portable , TB2.0.0.23, Flock2.5.2, IE8.0, SM2.0, Google Chrome2.0.x, Safari4.0.4, Zone Alarm; AVG9.0, JRE1.6_17
Back to top profile
Fulvio
Moderator


Joined: 19 Jun 2002
Posts: 11048
31 Jul, 2008 9:34 am [sdp=93057]  

Maybe the thing is not perfect. In first place, a poll came up. It beats me why. Just ignore it.
In second place, I could not edit nor reply from the message.
And, finally, it seems to have stolen default for the browser
It is cute, but no cigar. Just a curiosity.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1

"I've got a very poor sense of direction. I keep forgetting which way is forwards."
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, 3.0.15 regular, 3.5.5 regular and portable , TB2.0.0.23, Flock2.5.2, IE8.0, SM2.0, Google Chrome2.0.x, Safari4.0.4, Zone Alarm; AVG9.0, JRE1.6_17

Last edited by Fulvio on 31 Jul, 2008 9:54 am; edited once(1)
Back to top profile
James
diamond member


Joined: 12 Jul 2002
Posts: 1746
31 Jul, 2008 9:46 am [sdp=93058]  

Personally, I don't care for it. I like two separate apps: an e-mail client (i.e. Windows Mail or Outlook) and a browser (i.e. Firefox). It's one of the reasons I was so glad to be able to dump the suite and why SeaMonkey has never been an attraction for me. I want them separate. If one goes down, the other stands. An all-in-one idea (and this appears to be heading in that direction) is definitely not a plus for me (with one exception: security. I'm a sucker for security suites... not sure why). So... my bottom line is: Thunderbrowser would be of no interest to me.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1

James
It's later than you think.

Firefox 3.5.3, IE 8
Back to top profile
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index > Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape All times are CST (GMT -6)
page 1 of 1
To add your questions, comments, and for more features and more, please join SillyDog701 Message Centre. It's free! This is SillyDog 701 Message Centre (SD701 Forums).

Samantha Who You can support SillyDog701 when you buy your favourite music, TV shows, movies from iTunes Store. You can even rent movies from iTunes Store.

*Search | FAQ | Rules and Policies | MozInfo701 - Mozilla Information Centre | SD701 Open Directory | Message Board Map | download Netscape