| SillyDog701 Forums |
| Author |
Message |
Antony


Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 12754 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
09 Feb, 2007 7:22 am Hello again, Windows 95 |
[sdp=82243] |
|
I got a copy of Windows 95 CD from John on Thursday. He was throwing it out, and I said I want it. This disk comes with Windows 95 (B) and Microsoft Plus! as seen in photo above.
Now, I have a problem installing it under Parallels Desktop for Mac. The disc is not bootable. All modern Macs do not have a floppy drive.
According to Parallel Desktop for Mac User Guide, I will need to use an external USB floppy drive or an image file (of the floppy).
Can someone help me on creating a Windows 95B book disk image? In .fdd (created by Parallels Image Tools) or .img or .ima (such as created by WinImage or VMwarer), if you still have a copy of Windows 95B startup disk.
Edit, topic renamed from "Hello Windows 95"
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1
Last edited by Antony on 09 Feb, 2007 9:57 pm; edited once(1) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Don_HH2K


Joined: 09 May 2004 Posts: 4745
|
09 Feb, 2007 8:40 am |
[sdp=82245] |
|
I could send you an image of one of my MS-DOS 7 bootdiscs with CD support, but it'd be a lot easier for you to go download one from Bootdisk.Com or some other source. Since most of those autoextract to a floppy, I suggest you scroll down to "Non-Windows Based Image Files W/ImageApp", download the Windows 98 image, and load the .img file into Parallels, renaming it to .fdd or whatever Parallels wants if necessary. From there, choose to boot with CD support, then run d:\win95\setup.exe.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2 x64; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061030 BonEcho/2.0 (mmoy CE K8N-X02)
Laptop: Turion 64 X2 @ 2GHz, 2GB DDR2-667, 100GB HD, ATI Radeon X300, 15" LCD, Seven Ultimate RC |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antony


Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 12754 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
09 Feb, 2007 9:06 am |
[sdp=82246] |
|
| Don_HH2K wrote: | but it'd be a lot easier for you to go download one from Bootdisk.Com or some other source. Since most of those autoextract to a floppy, I suggest you scroll down to "Non-Windows Based Image Files W/ImageApp", download the Windows 98 image, and load the .img file into Parallels, renaming it to .fdd or whatever Parallels wants if necessary. From there, choose to boot with CD support, then run d:\win95\setup.exe. | Thanks, I was there, but did not keep reading. The Windows 95B file (.exe) did no help to me, since I don't have a physical floppy drive.
What stuck me was that I was unable to format the C: hard drive from all attempts.
It is looking good so far,

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antony


Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 12754 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
09 Feb, 2007 9:50 am |
[sdp=82248] |
|
Thanks for the help.
Windows 95 is now running.
Don't we all love those good old start up and shut down screens?
And Parallels Tools supports Windows 95!
If someone can tell me how to set up network for Windows 95.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James


Joined: 12 Jul 2002 Posts: 1747
|
09 Feb, 2007 10:24 am |
[sdp=82251] |
|
Man... that brings back good memories. I'm curious, Antony, why you've chosen to install Win 95?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2pre) Gecko/20070111 SeaMonkey/1.1
James
It's later than you think.
Firefox 3.5.3, IE 8 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PaulD


Joined: 14 Aug 2006 Posts: 825
|
09 Feb, 2007 12:59 pm |
[sdp=82259] |
|
Ah yes. "The good old days". I have a (then-)top-of-the-line genuine IBM system: Dec. 1995, 200 MHz, 32MB RAM (since upgraded with an additional 16MB salvaged from a scrap Gateway (also Win95)), 3.2GB (factory partitioned 4 ways). Windows 95.950. (Pardon me - this perhaps belongs in the Reminiscences forum. Anyway ---)
The machine still works well for low-demand projects and ain't dead yet by a long shot. A couple of years ago I added a 10/100 NIC card and the machine cooperates well with the 3 XP Pro machines on the home network. The system still has Netscape 4.80, now unuseful. (I could, I know, upgrade it to Netscape 7.) Which brings me to the real point.
What are the last levels of Firefox and Thunderbird that run on Windows 95? And where can I get them? Sillydog has Netscape archives, but I haven't been able to locate any FF/TB Archive. Does it exist? If not, would there be any utility in having one?
I did at one time install the first Firefox 2.0 RC, and it ran fine. An attempt to install Thunderbird gave the false-negative error that there was not enough disk space. When Firefox 2.0 Final came out I uninstalled the RC (and unfortunately had already deleted the download.EXE), and sadly found that the Win95 door had been barred now also for FF. It would be nice to have useful internet access for those times when I'm using that system and need to research something. Resources aren't the constraint, interfacing is.
Antony asks: "If someone can tell me how to set up network for Windows 95."
I did the manual (a virtual wizard?) definitions to add the computer to the (then hub, now router) home workgroup. If that is what you want I can extract the pertinent information and post it. A domain definition I haven't delved into. I won't try to get screen shots.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Firefox/1.5.0.9 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antony


Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 12754 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
09 Feb, 2007 5:01 pm |
[sdp=82276] |
|
| James wrote: | I'm curious, Antony, why you've chosen to install Win 95? | Well, just for fun and for the good old days. (Also to tell the world that I don't need the survive with the latest operating system.)
I've just noticed that here were quite a lot of improvements over these years...
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antony


Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 12754 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
09 Feb, 2007 5:09 pm |
[sdp=82277] |
|
| PaulD wrote: | The machine still works well for low-demand projects and ain't dead yet by a long shot. A couple of years ago I added a 10/100 NIC card and the machine cooperates well with the 3 XP Pro machines on the home network. The system still has Netscape 4.80, now unuseful. (I could, I know, upgrade it to Netscape 7.) Which brings me to the real point. | The PC I had back then did not have a network card, I was on the good old slow dial up (33.6kbps then 56kbps modem).
| PaulD wrote: | What are the last levels of Firefox and Thunderbird that run on Windows 95? And where can I get them? Sillydog has Netscape archives, but I haven't been able to locate any FF/TB Archive. Does it exist? If not, would there be any utility in having one? | Andrew T. would be the expert on this. As for Firefox/Thunderbird Archive, Mozilla.org do keep all past versions somewhere.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pu7o


Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 1978 Location: Portugal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
beanboy89


Joined: 16 May 2004 Posts: 1470
|
09 Feb, 2007 8:20 pm |
[sdp=82287] |
|
I was talking to Andrew T. earlier this evening, and he said that Firefox 2.0 will not run on Windows 95. He had also talked to Nathan Lineback , another Windows 95 user, and Nathan could confirm that Firefox 2.0 will not run on Windows 95 or NT 3.51.
Andrew Turnbull wrote: |
The Bon Echo Alphas and Firefox 2 beta 1 both run on Windows 95 and NT 4.0, but Mozilla Firefox 2 may well prove to be the last version to do so, if at that. As of early 2006, the newest "trunk" nightly builds that will ultimately develop into Firefox 3.0 use MSVC80 DLLs that break compatibility, as well as a new rendering system that currently works only in Windows 2000 and XP. It remains to be seen if an additional compatibility layer will be added for Windows 9x and/or NT 4.0. More immediately, I have been unsuccessful in running Firefox 2 beta 2 and release candidate 1 on Windows 95 OSR2 ; the browser either immediately freezes or crashes with an invalid page fault in KERNEL32.DLL when I attempt to do so. |
Andrew Turnbull wrote: |
Unfortunately, Mozilla Firefox 2 is in fact incompatible with Windows 95: Thanks to a small Unicode API change made in development, the browser immediately freezes or crashes upon startup. This bug does not affect SeaMonkey 1.1 (based more or less on the same code) and could presumably be fixed in Firefox, but given the amount of attention the Mozilla developers give to Windows 95 nowadays (which is to say none at all) I don't count on it.
Links: Bug 346290 , Bug 353537 . |
Here's my take: If you're looking for a browser on Windows 95, I'd go with Firefox 1.5.0.9 or SeaMonkey 1.1, both of which are known to work on Windows 95. If you have an older PC, and are looking for a lighter browser, may I recommend K-Meleon .
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9a3pre) Gecko/20070207 Minefield/3.0a3pre
... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pu7o


Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 1978 Location: Portugal
|
09 Feb, 2007 11:13 pm |
[sdp=82293] |
|
Well, since you installed Windows 95 on Parallels, I'm going to 1-up you.
And here's Windows 98 on Parallels! 
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/419 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
profman


Joined: 11 Sep 2002 Posts: 1501
|
09 Feb, 2007 11:42 pm |
[sdp=82295] |
|
I still have a computer that can boot into DOS 6.22 and Windows for Workgroups 3.11 (or something like that). It still worked a few months ago when I tried it then. The system has a CPU that runs at a blistering 266 MHz. The default boot up is into Windows 98SE.
The Windows 98 side connects to my own LAN without trouble, but I do not believe that the Windows 3.11 side is network aware.
I would expect that Windows 95 could network as well as Windows 98 does. Perhaps a Google search would help Antony out in that regard.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PaulD


Joined: 14 Aug 2006 Posts: 825
|
12 Feb, 2007 1:18 pm |
[sdp=82415] |
|
I don't have a 98 system to experiment with, but yes, 95 works fine in a Workgroup. See last paragraph . One minor Share-ing glitch that I hit: 95 will not recognize a XP (NT-family?) shared folder that has a hyphen in it's name.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Firefox/1.5.0.9 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antony


Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 12754 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
12 Feb, 2007 1:41 pm |
[sdp=82417] |
|
Thanks Paul,
Can you tell me the list of network components you have installed (under Control Panel > Network > Configuration)?
I think I found the problem:
Realtek RTL8029 (Network card) is the one Parallels Desktop emulates, and Parallels provides a driver (for all versions of Windows). It seems like the Windows 95 driver does not work. (Even if I download the RTL8029 driver from the net, it still does not work.)
There are some reports of Windows 95 unable to go online in Parallels forums all without solution. I will report to Parallels.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PaulD


Joined: 14 Aug 2006 Posts: 825
|
15 Feb, 2007 3:49 pm |
[sdp=82563] |
|
My apologies for the delay in replying. My adapter is a different model.
Here are the complete specifications on my 1995 IBM PC NIC. The system came with a 28.8 dial-up modem, later bumped up to 33.6 via a driver update released in '96. I bought an inexpensive ethernet adapter about three years ago and connected the Windows 95 machine to a XP Pro system through a hub. (Later 2 additional XP Pro laptops were added.) I initially had hard IP addresses set all around, but backed those out when last November I finally got a DSL line and a router (hence DHCP support).
Some of these don't apply to your question, but are included for completeness.
Syntax below: 1) Lines starting with a bar [ | ] are in a box.
2) [X] means the item is checked, either a check box or a radio button.
3) The greater-than sign [ > ] signifies an icon selection or a tab.
Control Panel > System > Device Manager
| - Network adapters
| -- Dial-Up Adapter
| -- Realtek RTL8139/810X Family PCI Fast Ethernet NIC
--- Properties of this:
- > General
- Device type: Network adapters
- Manufacturer: Realtek
- Hardware version: 016
- > Resources
| - Interrupt Request --- 11
| - Memory Range --- 08000000 - 080000FF
| - Input/Output Range --- 1200 - 12FF
- [X] Use automatic settings
Control Panel > Network > Configuration
The following network components are installed:
| - Client for Microsoft Networks {Prop 1}
| ---- (The 'Properties' of each of these is in another section below.)
| - Dial-Up Adapter [I omit all detailed dial-up specifications.]
| - Realtek RTL8139/810X Family PCI Fast Ethernet NIC {Prop 2}
| ---- (Somewhere I think that I still have the package for this, although I can't find it in a quick search. If it becomes critical I'll do a more thorough scouring.)
| - TCP/IP -> Dial-Up Adapter
| - TCP/IP -> Realtek RTL8139/810X Family PCI Fast Ethernet NIC {Prop 3}
| - File and printer sharing for Microsoft Networks {Prop 4}
Primary Network Logon:
| - Windows Logon
File and Print Sharing... [button; when selected: a sub-window overlay:]
[X] I want to be able to give others access to my files.
[X] I want to be able to allow others to print to my printer(s).
Control Panel > Network > Identification
- Computer name: Win95
- Workgroup: MSHOME
- Computer Description: Front Room
Control Panel > Network > Access Control
- [X] Share-level access control
{Prop 1} Client for Microsoft Networks Properties
Logon validation [all blank]
Network logon options - [X] Quick logon
{Prop 2} Realtek RTL[... etc.] > Driver Type
[X] Enhanced mode (32 bit and 16 bit) NDIS driver
Realtek RTL[... etc.] > Bindings
| - [X] TCP/IP -> Realtek[... etc.]
Realtek RTL[... etc.] > Advanced
| - Early Tx Threshold --- 38
| - Link Speed/Duplex Mode --- Auto Mode [choice of combinations of 100/10 and Full/Half]
| - Network Address --- [X] Not Present
{Prop 3} TCP/IP Properties > Bindings
| - [X] Client for Microsoft Networks
| - [X] File and printer sharing for Microsoft Networks
TCP/IP Properties > Advanced
Property: --- | - None
TCP/IP Properties > NetBIOS (all grayed out)
TCP/IP Properties > DNS Configuration
- [X] Disable DNS
TCP/IP Properties > Gateway (all blank)
TCP/IP Properties > WINS Resolution
- [X] Disable WINS Resolution
TCP/IP Properties > IP Address
- [X] Obtain an IP address automatically
{Prop 4} File and printer sharing ...
| - Browse Master --- Automatic
| - LM Announce --- No
=========
I know that 95% of the above is of no use. But which 5% is of use, that's the conundrum.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|