Safari 3.1 released

page previous  1, 2
You are here:  SillyDog701 > Message Centre > Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape > [sdt=14530]
SillyDog701 Forums
Author Message
Antony
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jun 2002
Posts: 12754
Location: Sydney, Australia
28 Mar, 2008 7:28 am [sdp=90905]  

Don_HH2K wrote:
It seems that Apple goofed in Safari's EULA - it's against the license terms to install it on a non-Apple-branded PC.


Apple has since modified the Windows version of the SLA for Safari for Windows to read, "This license allows you to install and use one copy of the Apple Software on each computer owned or controlled by you." That change effectively eliminates any issues regarding installing Safari on Windows.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080311 Firefox/2.0.0.13

Back to top profile website
Dr Lobster*
super member


Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 161
Location: Norfolk, UK
29 Mar, 2008 6:50 am [sdp=90925]  

i do really like the font rendering, it's so crisp.

but speed wise, i'm not sure in real world usage it is the fastest. it's fast, but somehow ffb4 seems faster.

the interface is horrible. not a major reason for not using it, but that horrible brushed grey effect is ghastly. at least make it look like a windows application on windows, please or let the user choose.

also, no adblock is a killer. everytime i have to use a browser without adblock installed, it amazes me the sheer amount of rubbish i never, ever see.

maybe that's why firefox feels faster to me... it doesn't need to load all the rubbish adverts and intellitxt scripts. (in fact, even this site has intellitxt scripts highlighting words in the forum. i had never seen them before i tried look here with safari!)

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9b4) Gecko/2008030714 Firefox/3.0b4

Last edited by Dr Lobster* on 29 Mar, 2008 7:11 am; edited once(1)
Back to top profile
Fulvio
Moderator


Joined: 19 Jun 2002
Posts: 11048
30 Mar, 2008 11:18 am [sdp=90936]  

Quote:
Now that's Unethical.

I don't understand all this unethical fuss. But, would I have more than one computer, I could care leass for Safari, if I understand the restrictions.
I, always, agree with everything, because not agreeing means that you don't want the program as it comes. But, I would be very upset, if anyone would force me to keep a program, or use it only the way they want it. Can you imagine something like this?
And, I am talking about individual programs, not OS.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080304 Firefox/2.0.0.12 Flock/1.1

"I've got a very poor sense of direction. I keep forgetting which way is forwards."
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, 3.0.15 regular, 3.5.5 regular and portable , TB2.0.0.23, Flock2.5.2, IE8.0, SM2.0, Google Chrome2.0.x, Zone Alarm Firewall; AVG9.0, JRE1.6_17
Back to top profile
Fulvio
Moderator


Joined: 19 Jun 2002
Posts: 11048
07 Apr, 2008 2:04 pm [sdp=91058]  

One comment about using Safari.
Yesterday, I thought that it would be neat to do the income taxes for my son (he owes quite a bit). Going to irs.gov all sort of stuff is available, including the ability of doing the returns on .pdf files. I backed up the files, at different times, but did not check them. I had the backed up files directed to the desktop. The return was not completed, and I backed up the file one more time. When I exited, there was no backed up file. After much cussing, I redid the form in Firefox, and found that the incomplete file had been backed up, as a .pdf file. Flock gave me the same option as Safari, i.e. to save the 1040.pdf as All Files. However, Flock saved the file, but Safari did not.
And, to those people who freak out because such files need to be downloaded, and opened outside the browser, I have an answer. File|Save does nothing, in Safari at least, but the icons in Adobe Readers do work, but, still no saving.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080311 Firefox/2.0.0.13

"I've got a very poor sense of direction. I keep forgetting which way is forwards."
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, 3.0.15 regular, 3.5.5 regular and portable , TB2.0.0.23, Flock2.5.2, IE8.0, SM2.0, Google Chrome2.0.x, Zone Alarm Firewall; AVG9.0, JRE1.6_17
Back to top profile
J-M
diamond member


Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 777
Location: Helsinki, Finland
01 Aug, 2008 1:33 am [sdp=93072]  

The most recent Apple Safari version is 3.1.2 now:

Apple Safari Memory Corruption Vulnerability

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080702 Firefox/2.0.0.16
Back to top profile website
Joost
junior member


Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Posts: 9
10 Aug, 2008 2:57 pm [sdp=93189]  

James wrote:
Questions:

- Can Safari be easily removed?


Yes, I have removed it from my WinXP machines after checking it out for a short while.
The Apple Software updater will continue to offer it after removal though, just like it will plug newer versions of iTunes (7.7) that put a MobileMe icon in XP's control panel.

James wrote:

- Does it have anything similar to ad-block?


There is nothing similar to FF add-on apps; a very big disadvantage imho..

James wrote:

- Will McAfee SiteAdvisor work with it?


I don't know.
May be you don't need a site advisor while on Safari Wink

James wrote:

- Besides speed of loading, what are its strong points that might entice a FF user to try it out?


I tried it for a while because the render engine is supposed to be very good (strict) and wanted to check a couple of sites I developed. Can't see any real 'uniqueness' though when I compare it with Opera, Firefox or SeaMonkey. I really missed the functionality of the FF add-ons and - critical for me with any browser - I just didn't like the way bookmarks or cookies can be managed, so was done with it pretty quickly.

James wrote:

Just curious.


Smile

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080702 Firefox/2.0.0.16
Back to top profile
James
diamond member


Joined: 12 Jul 2002
Posts: 1747
10 Aug, 2008 5:21 pm [sdp=93192]  

Wow. My questions were finally answered (six months later but answered nonetheless). Thanks. After having read your responses and also having purchased a new computer, I don't think I would bother downloading and trying out Safari. I see very little to be gained. Besides, Firefox just does it all for me so why look elsewhere?

Again... thanks for answering my original questions. Smile

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1

James
It's later than you think.

Firefox 3.5.3, IE 8
Back to top profile
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index > Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape All times are CST (GMT -6)
page 2 of 2 page previous  1, 2
To add your questions, comments, and for more features and more, please join SillyDog701 Message Centre. It's free! This is SillyDog 701 Message Centre (SD701 Forums).

App Store You can support SillyDog701 when you buy your favourite music, TV shows, movies from iTunes Store. You can even rent movies from iTunes Store.

*Search | FAQ | Rules and Policies | MozInfo701 - Mozilla Information Centre | SD701 Open Directory | Message Board Map | download Netscape