Netscape Browser 8.0.3.3 released

page 1, 2  next
You are here:  SillyDog701 > Message Centre > Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape > [sdt=9584]
SillyDog701 Forums
Author Message
J-M
diamond member


Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 774
Location: Helsinki, Finland
08 Aug, 2005 12:05 pm Netscape Browser 8.0.3.3 released [sdp=61870]  

http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/download/default.jsp

There was no version 8.0.3.2 at all.

From Release Notes (http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/support/relnotes.jsp):

Quote:
The Netscape Browser

Version 8.0.3.3

Visit the security center on http://browser.netscape.com for detailed security fixes.

What's fixed in this version?

All security and bug fixes through Firefox 1.0.6
• A bug disabling downloads for many users

Underlining done by me

- Juha-Matti

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fi-FI; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4

Last edited by J-M on 08 Aug, 2005 12:17 pm; edited once(1)
Back to top profile website
J-M
diamond member


Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 774
Location: Helsinki, Finland
08 Aug, 2005 12:09 pm [sdp=61871]  

From Security Alerts page:

• MFSA 2005-56 Code execution through shared function objects
• MFSA 2005-55 XHTML node spoofing
• MFSA 2005-54 Javascript prompt origin spoofing
• MFSA 2005-53 Standalone applications can run arbitrary code through the browser
• MFSA 2005-52 Same origin violation: frame calling top.focus()
• MFSA 2005-51 The return of frame-injection spoofing
• MFSA 2005-50 Possibly exploitable crash in InstallVersion.compareTo()
• MFSA 2005-49 Script injection from Firefox sidebar panel using data:
• MFSA 2005-48 Same-origin violation with InstallTrigger callback
• MFSA 2005-47 Code execution via "Set as Wallpaper"
• MFSA 2005-46 XBL scripts ran even when Javascript disabled
• MFSA 2005-45 Content-generated event vulnerabilities

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fi-FI; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4
Back to top profile website
Ginkan
member


Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 35
08 Aug, 2005 1:45 pm [sdp=61875]  

thx god... it finally come out

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050603 Netscape/8.0.2
Back to top profile
richard mitnick
diamond member


Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 1075
Location: Highland Park, New Jersey
08 Aug, 2005 1:57 pm netscape 8.3.0.3 [sdp=61879]  

I ran Check for Updates in Tool|Options and got nothing.

I got the update, by going to Downloads in netscape.com. But how come the check in Tools|Options did not work? It worked fine for 8.0.3.1.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050729 Netscape/8.0.3.3
Back to top profile
J-M
diamond member


Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 774
Location: Helsinki, Finland
08 Aug, 2005 7:06 pm [sdp=61899]  

* No new themes available

* No changes in splash screen

*According to UA string (...en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050729 Netscape/8.0.3.3) version 8.0.3.3 is based to Gecko version from 29th July

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050729 Netscape/8.0.3.3
Back to top profile website
Antony
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jun 2002
Posts: 12725
Location: Sydney, Australia
08 Aug, 2005 8:57 pm [sdp=61904]  

J-M wrote:
*According to UA string (...en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050729 Netscape/8.0.3.3) version 8.0.3.3 is based to Gecko version from 29th July
There's no need to use the latest version available, may that be bleeding-edge version.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/412.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/412.2

Back to top profile website
Antony
Site Admin


Joined: 18 Jun 2002
Posts: 12725
Location: Sydney, Australia
08 Aug, 2005 9:03 pm [sdp=61906]  

I noticed something interesting about the disk space requirement:

Netscape pages say "35 MB hard drive space" (at time of posting).


But in my installation, it asked for 50.5MB disk space.
(I removed Netscape 8.0.3.1 from Windows 2000 Pro SP 4 under Virtual PC 7.0.2.)



Also, Netscape 8.0.3.1 used Nullsoft Install system v2.07, now it's v2.08 for the installer software.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/412.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/412.2

Back to top profile website
J-M
diamond member


Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 774
Location: Helsinki, Finland
17 Aug, 2005 4:49 pm [sdp=62265]  

It seems that we have not so much end-user based (or not end-user Smile) feedback about new 8.0.3.3, noticed after version 8.0.3.1 release too.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fi-FI; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050717 Firefox/1.0.6
Back to top profile website
Pu7o
Macfox


Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 1978
Location: Portugal
23 Aug, 2005 3:07 pm [sdp=62452]  

People, the number after Gecko/ is the date when Netscape was compiled!!! It is NOT the Gecko release date! The Gecko revision is the number after rv: (in this case 1.7.5), which means that Netscape is using a patched Firefox 1.0 Gecko code! It is NOT using Gecko from 29th July!

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050720 Firefox/1.0.6 (mmoy CE 1.0.6 K8B-X33)
Back to top profile website
Andrew T.
diamond member


Joined: 14 Mar 2003
Posts: 1229
Location: Somewhere beyond the sea
23 Aug, 2005 3:24 pm [sdp=62453]  

Pu7o wrote:
People, the number after Gecko/ is the date when Netscape was compiled!!! It is NOT the Gecko release date! The Gecko revision is the number after rv: (in this case 1.7.5), which means that Netscape is using a patched Firefox 1.0 Gecko code! It is NOT using Gecko from 29th July!


That's correct. If someone compiled the code of Netscape 6.0 from 2000 today, the resulting Gecko build ID would be "20050823" even though the browser and therefore Gecko codebase are in fact nearly five years old.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6
Back to top profile
DJGM
diamond member


Joined: 19 Jun 2002
Posts: 4370
Location: Manchester, England, UK
27 Sep, 2005 6:44 pm [sdp=64123]  

I think it's about time this thread was downgraded from Announcement to normal status, especially
since Netscape have not yet bothered to apply the patches for the recent security vulnerabilities.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050910 SeaMonkey/1.0a

SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
Back to top profile website
DiGravioandSons
member

Joe
Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 40
Location: NJ USA
01 Oct, 2005 6:31 am [sdp=64223]  

I went to the Netscape forum a few days ago and asked the question of why Netscape has not issued patches for the recent security vulnerabilities. The answer I got from the forum administrator was what vulnerabilities are these, could you be more specific. I listed these vulnerabilities to him. Now I am not a computer wiz, but i do know about the security issues which affected Firefox,Mozilla,and Netscape browsers.I asked why Netscape has not patched there browser, but Firefox and Mozilla issued quick patches. He stated it will be updated in the next version,but they are not serious security threats. My question is Netscape is based on Firefox. Firefox took this very ser. and issued fast patches. Netscape is playing the security issue down WHY.

UserAgent: Opera/8.50 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en)
Back to top profile
DJGM
diamond member


Joined: 19 Jun 2002
Posts: 4370
Location: Manchester, England, UK
01 Oct, 2005 7:12 am [sdp=64224]  

The Netscape Browser forum admin is wrong to play down these vulnerabilities, given the
fact that they were/are quite serious vulnerabilities, even for the Gecko based browsers.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050910 SeaMonkey/1.0a

SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
Back to top profile website
Pu7o
Macfox


Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 1978
Location: Portugal
01 Oct, 2005 8:35 am [sdp=64225]  

Actually, the one who said that these vulnerabilities were not important was not the NSB forum admin, but Jay Garcia.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/312.5.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/312.3.1
Back to top profile website
DiGravioandSons
member

Joe
Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 40
Location: NJ USA
01 Oct, 2005 12:41 pm [sdp=64227]  

The way he has to answer for everyone,and downplays any Netscape problems I assumed he was the Netscape forum admin. If i am not mistaken he did say he worked for Netscape. Because when a issue comes up he checks with his supervisor.

UserAgent: Opera/8.50 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en)
Back to top profile
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Forum Index > Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape All times are CST (GMT -6)
page 1 of 2 page 1, 2  next
To add your questions, comments, and for more features and more, please join SillyDog701 Message Centre. It's free! This is SillyDog 701 Message Centre (SD701 Forums).

Star Wars Your favourite music, radio, music videos, TV shows, movies and more...
Download on iTunes

*Search | FAQ | Rules and Policies | MozInfo701 - Mozilla Information Centre | SD701 Open Directory | Message Board Map | download Netscape