SillyDog701

[Antony]

SillyDog701 is saddened to announce that we learnt that Mr Ronnie Williams II decided to defame SillyDog701 by purchasing following three domain names.


When Antony asked him if he bought [tt]holycowsucks[/tt] counterparts as well?
Mr Ronnie Williams II threatened back,

you see, i have legal trademark over the holycow network names, so you taking there names and naming "sucks" at the end might just end up a legal suit

and since ronsnexus is part of the holycownetwork site........so using that might get another legal suit...

A whois database shows Ronnie Williams bought the domain name(s) on 19-Jan-2006 06:46:44 UTC.

A screenshot of whois record taken just few minutes prior to this post is available here.

Mr Ronnie Williams has previously [sdp=63887]threatened[/sdp] to have SillyDog701 server confiscated by FBI, based on his wrong accusation. He [sdt=10011]apologised[/sdt] 16 days later.

SillyDog701 would like to seek public support on this unwarranted assault, any advise welcome.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/417.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/417.8

[Ron Williams]

Antony,
Whether you have a problem with me buying these domains or not, there's nothing you can do. The reason is you don't police your intelectual property. Take a look at http://www.sillydog701.com. However I do.......

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5

[James]

Why did you do this? Unless you have a very good reason for your actions, I will be forced to boycott your sites. It's understood that Antony founded SillyDog and for you to attempt to wrest control of his "intellectual property" as you state, is little more than a despicable and juvenile thing to do. So, let's hear your reasons for your actions and we as a community will judge for ourselves.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20051012 Netscape/8.0.4

[Ron Williams]

I actually did this not to put anything on that site, however the reason I did it was to see what antony would do in response to this. I guess you could say, I wanted to add fuel to the fire. I'm tired of my posts being deleted and Antony's constant claim that anyone who mentions something bad about apple is an apple basher.

What angered me is when I made reference to this article. I did not claim that iTunes was spytunes, I just stated that a "storm" of users had labeled iTunes this.

I did have second thoughts regarding the purchase, but why should I hush my feelings? I've tried to privately handle issues regarding posts. You can only take things for so long.

A post regarding an iPod being smashed was sent to underground due to Antony not liking it. And DJGM locked it before anyone could reply. When I asked DJGM for a reason, I never got a response. You can see the message I sent to DJGM here.

That's just one thing, then there was the iBoxer post. The first reply was by TK19 and to me, he seemed to be unhappy with the post there as he made a statement that was not possitive "what the f***" clearly, everyone can figure what the f-word is. Then Andrew T. said they belonged in his "most ludicrous inventions file". So when I said "And if this were e-mail, It would be deleted.......", antony asked "What are you suggesting?", I said "Maybe the same be done to this topic?". See here for that conversation. To me, that item and the way that it was presented (on a person) is ignorant. Aren't underwear to be worn under clothes, notice the UNDER.

Don't forget the "bleedingly obvious" statement regarding admin also known as Antony by Jarrad/Mandrake. Antony NEVER admited he was admin, however it's pretty obvious he is.

I have no care for the intellectual property here at SD701, it's not worth anything to me.

And I'll admit, it is juvenile, but if I use the domains, they will only be to show what happens here, IE the truth regarding the extreme censorship. It's nearly as bad as china's censorship.

Sorry if you feel you have to boycott my websites, but if you choose to, it's your choice. Don't bring don's site into this, since I do host and own the domain for it. He had no prior knowledge regarding my purchase of the SDsucks.com/.net/.org domains.

James, At least your decent about this ask first then judge...even if you disagree with me.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5

[James]

I just don't understand the need to fight. We're a community.. almost a sort of family... aren't we? I've been coming here since 2002 (and even before that I was going to the older site) to ask my questions, get help in configuring my browsers, in turn help my wife and friends, and even on rare occasions try to give some help to someone here myself. I think I would feel lost without this community's support.

UserAgent: Opera/9.0 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en)

[Antony]

I actually did this not to put anything on that site, however the reason I did it was to see what antony would do in response to this. I guess you could say, I wanted to add fuel to the fire. I'm tired of my posts being deleted and Antony's constant claim that anyone who mentions something bad about apple is an apple basher.

What angered me is when I made reference to this article. I did not claim that iTunes was spytunes, I just stated that a "storm" of users had labeled iTunes this.

I did have second thoughts regarding the purchase, but why should I hush my feelings? I've tried to privately handle issues regarding posts. You can only take things for so long.

A post regarding an iPod being smashed was sent to underground due to Antony not liking it. And DJGM locked it before anyone could reply. When I asked DJGM for a reason, I never got a response. You can see the message I sent to DJGM here.

That's just one thing, then there was the iBoxer post. The first reply was by TK19 and to me, he seemed to be unhappy with the post there as he made a statement that was not possitive "what the f***" clearly, everyone can figure what the f-word is. Then Andrew T. said they belonged in his "most ludicrous inventions file". So when I said "And if this were e-mail, It would be deleted.......", antony asked "What are you suggesting?", I said "Maybe the same be done to this topic?". See here for that conversation. To me, that item and the way that it was presented (on a person) is ignorant. Aren't underwear to be worn under clothes, notice the UNDER.

Don't forget the "bleedingly obvious" statement regarding admin also known as Antony by Jarrad/Mandrake. Antony NEVER admited he was admin, however it's pretty obvious he is.

I have no care for the intellectual property here at SD701, it's not worth anything to me.

And I'll admit, it is juvenile, but if I use the domains, they will only be to show what happens here, IE the truth regarding the extreme censorship. It's nearly as bad as china's censorship.

Sorry if you feel you have to boycott my websites, but if you choose to, it's your choice. Don't bring don's site into this, since I do host and own the domain for it. He had no prior knowledge regarding my purchase of the SDsucks.com/.net/.org domains.

James, At least your decent about this ask first then judge...even if you disagree with me.

Just to add a few words to this.

What angered me is when I made reference to this article. I did not claim that iTunes was spytunes, I just stated that a "storm" of users had labeled iTunes this.

Did you?

Allow me to recall what you said,
“Well, let's see. Most users have reasons to not use iTMS. Let's hear them.

Well I have two.

First is, it's slow.

Second, Spytunesâ€

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/417.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/417.8

[Ron Williams]

I actually did this not to put anything on that site, however the reason I did it was to see what antony would do in response to this. I guess you could say, I wanted to add fuel to the fire. I'm tired of my posts being deleted and Antony's constant claim that anyone who mentions something bad about apple is an apple basher.

What angered me is when I made reference to this article. I did not claim that iTunes was spytunes, I just stated that a "storm" of users had labeled iTunes this.

I did have second thoughts regarding the purchase, but why should I hush my feelings? I've tried to privately handle issues regarding posts. You can only take things for so long.

A post regarding an iPod being smashed was sent to underground due to Antony not liking it. And DJGM locked it before anyone could reply. When I asked DJGM for a reason, I never got a response. You can see the message I sent to DJGM here.

That's just one thing, then there was the iBoxer post. The first reply was by TK19 and to me, he seemed to be unhappy with the post there as he made a statement that was not possitive "what the f***" clearly, everyone can figure what the f-word is. Then Andrew T. said they belonged in his "most ludicrous inventions file". So when I said "And if this were e-mail, It would be deleted.......", antony asked "What are you suggesting?", I said "Maybe the same be done to this topic?". See here for that conversation. To me, that item and the way that it was presented (on a person) is ignorant. Aren't underwear to be worn under clothes, notice the UNDER.

Don't forget the "bleedingly obvious" statement regarding admin also known as Antony by Jarrad/Mandrake. Antony NEVER admited he was admin, however it's pretty obvious he is.

I have no care for the intellectual property here at SD701, it's not worth anything to me.

And I'll admit, it is juvenile, but if I use the domains, they will only be to show what happens here, IE the truth regarding the extreme censorship. It's nearly as bad as china's censorship.

Sorry if you feel you have to boycott my websites, but if you choose to, it's your choice. Don't bring don's site into this, since I do host and own the domain for it. He had no prior knowledge regarding my purchase of the SDsucks.com/.net/.org domains.

James, At least your decent about this ask first then judge...even if you disagree with me.

Just to add a few words to this.

What angered me is when I made reference to this article. I did not claim that iTunes was spytunes, I just stated that a "storm" of users had labeled iTunes this.

Did you?

Allow me to recall what you said,
“Well, let's see. Most users have reasons to not use iTMS. Let's hear them.

Well I have two.

First is, it's slow.

Second, Spytunesâ€

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5

[Antony]

SillyDog701 is regret to report Mr Ronnie Williams II is leaving us.

(Some of Mr Ronnie Williams II's latest posts showing extreme anger were removed.)

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/417.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/417.8

[Antony]

It appeared that Mr Ronnie Williams II still have strong anger against SillyDog701 even after he left us in January.

Kindly follow the steps, go to http://www.alexa.com/ and type [tt]http://sillydog.org/[/tt] in the search box. Then you should see this Alexa result page:



Someone posted,

Very closeminded,
The admin at the site is very closeminded and rude. Check out http://www.sillydogsucks.com for info on that.

Who wrote that?

Simply scroll down that page, and click the link See all 6 Reviews on Amazon.com..., and you will see following screenshot:



It's obviously the person who bought those insulting domains wrote that.

By the way, my dictionary says there's no such word as “closemindedâ€

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/417.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/417.8