SillyDog701

by **Mandrake** » Fri 14 Feb, 2003 9:04 am

Well Maybe Netscape isnt designed to be unbreakable... its just that IE is a really insecure browser?

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030213

by **Antony** » Sat 01 Mar, 2003 7:38 pm

SillyDog701 Traffic Report (February 2003)
All right guys, this is some selected traffic data of SillyDog701 (http connections only, FTP traffic is not included.)
Those data are generated from accesslog (the accesslog itself is 438MB), not from third party's image tracking.
Time Period: 1st February, 2003, 06:00: AM to 1st March, 2003, 06:29:47 AM (AEST)
Total Hits: 2165534 (2.1 million)
Unique IP addresses: 39948
Total Data Transferred: 11.06 GB (HTTP only, not include FTP)

Data analysed by FastStatsAnalyzer.

Web Browsers:

Code: Select all: (hits) (percentage) NS5.x 745478 34.48% // note 1 IE6.x 718875 33.25% IE5.x 319086 14.76% NS4.x 200654 9.28% Other 81565 3.77% // note 2 NS3.x 36711 1.70% NS6.x 27408 1.27% Opera 14646 0.68% // note 3 IE4.x 10509 0.49% IE3.x 3583 0.17% NS2.x 2659 0.12% IE2.x 320 0.01% Lynx 270 0.01% Mosaic 0 0.00% //note 1: includes NS7.xx and all Mozilla builds but NO NS6. //note 2: includes robots //note 3: un-spoofed Opera only

From above results: Netscape 46.85%, MSIE 48.68%.

Edit: fix typo.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 (CK-SillyDog)

by **Antony** » Tue 01 Apr, 2003 11:00 pm

SillyDog701 Traffic Report (March 2003)
All right guys, this is some selected traffic data of SillyDog701 (http connections only, FTP traffic is not included.)
Those data are generated from accesslog (the accesslog itself is 519MB), not from third party's image tracking.
Time Period: 1st March, 2003, 06:00:01 AM to 1st April, 2003, 06:29:54 AM (AEDST - AEST)
Total Hits: 2548101 (2.5 million)
Unique IP addresses: 50154
Total Data Transferred: 13.12 GB (HTTP only, not include FTP)

Data analysed by FastStatsAnalyzer.

Web Browsers:

Code: Select all: (hits) (percentage) IE6.x 911919 35.83% NS5.x 826975 32.49% // note 1 IE5.x 356787 14.02% NS4.x 217386 8.54% Other 116140 4.56% // note 2 NS3.x 48626 1.91% NS6.x 25656 1.01% Opera 21381 0.84% // note 3 IE4.x 10833 0.43% NS2.x 4622 0.18% IE3.x 4125 0.16% IE2.x 366 0.01% Mosaic 180 0.01% Lynx 146 0.01% //note 1: includes NS7.xx and all Mozilla builds but NO NS6. //note 2: includes robots //note 3: un-spoofed Opera only

From above results: Netscape 44.13%, MSIE 50.45%.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja-JP; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 (CK-SillyDog)

by **Wellander** » Tue 01 Apr, 2003 11:14 pm

Hi,'
I am dissappointed about that netscape is losing this is not good because if it is happining here I will not like to see how the rest of the web looks like. :evil:

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.75 [en]C-CCK-MCD BDP81800 (Windows NT 5.0; U)

by **Mandrake** » Wed 02 Apr, 2003 4:16 am

Pretty much the same as usual.

Wellander: Go check out * and look in the statistics section, should make you feel better

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030329

by **Wellander** » Wed 02 Apr, 2003 9:18 am

Hi,
I do feel better about the satistict at *
There are alot of netscape users there.

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.75 [en]C-CCK-MCD BDP81800 (Windows NT 5.0; U)

by **DJGM** » Wed 02 Apr, 2003 9:40 am

IMO, it's good that this site attracts a good number of MSIE users. They
can learn the error of their ways, and then download a decent browser!

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 (DJGM-i.net)

by **Edward** » Wed 02 Apr, 2003 6:16 pm

The numbers have to start moving in the opposite direction again.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02

by **Mandrake** » Wed 02 Apr, 2003 9:52 pm

I honestly cannot see why 2% of people would come here with a Netscape 3.x version! Very Very Intresting...

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.75C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC)

by **Edward** » Thu 03 Apr, 2003 5:27 pm

Mandrake wrote:I honestly cannot see why 2% of people would come here with a Netscape 3.x version! Very Very Intresting...

I'd extend that to Netscape 2 and Mosaic...

Unless those who used it are testing them to see how pages are displayed...

UserAgent: Opera/7.03 (Windows 98; U) [en]

by **Antony** » Mon 05 May, 2003 1:44 am

SillyDog701 Traffic Report (April 2003)
All right guys, this is some selected traffic data of SillyDog701 (http connections only, FTP traffic is not included.)
Those data are generated from accesslog (the accesslog itself is 460MB), not from third party's image tracking.
Time Period: 1st April, 2003, 06:00:45 AM to 1st May, 2003, 06:24:59 AM (AEDST - AEST)
Total Hits: 2242595 (2.2 million)
Unique IP addresses: 50501
Total Data Transferred: 10.72 GB (HTTP only, not include FTP)

Data analysed by FastStatsAnalyzer.

Web Browsers:

Code: Select all: (hits) (percentage) IE6.x 848041 37.88% NS5.x 722928 32.29% // note 1 IE5.x 310468 13.87% NS4.x 178674 7.98% Other 73009 3.26% // note 2 NS3.x 43488 1.94% NS6.x 21312 0.95% Opera 18552 0.83% // note 3 NS2.x 8814 0.39% IE4.x 7521 0.34% IE3.x 5842 0.26% IE2.x 167 0.01% Lynx 119 0.01% Mosaic 1 0.00% //note 1: includes NS7.xx and all Mozilla builds but NO NS6. //note 2: includes robots //note 3: un-spoofed Opera only

From above results: Netscape 43.55%, MSIE 52.36%.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 (CK-SillyDog)

by **hudor** » Sun 25 May, 2003 6:15 pm

While it's fine that more than half of the people who visit a site dedicated to Netscape and Mozilla use Netscape and Mozilla, isn't the really significant statistic is that *nearly* half of them use IE? I mean, your excitement is the equivalent of bragging that the championship team of a particular school's intramural softball league all go to that school! Or more accurately...that more of the players go do that school than don't!

I'm no fan of IE, but c'mon....

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 (CK-SillyDog)

by **Antony** » Wed 09 Jul, 2003 4:19 am

SillyDog701 Traffic Report (May 2003)
All right guys, this is some selected traffic data of SillyDog701
Those data are generated from accesslog (the accesslog itself is 432MB), not from third party's image tracking.
Time Period: 1st May, 2003, 06:00:07 AM to 1st June, 2003, 06:24:54 AM (AEST)
Total Hits: 2106799 (2.1 million)
Unique IP addresses: 43895
Total Data Transferred: 10.14 GB (HTTP only)
SillyDog701 FTP transferred 55.70 GB of traffic during this month.

Data analysed by FastStatsAnalyzer.

Web Browsers: (http connections only, FTP traffic is not included.)

Code: Select all: (hits) (percentage) IE6.x 827948 39.46% NS5.x 676976 32.27% // note 1 IE5.x 270756 12.91% NS4.x 176187 8.40% Other 56698 2.70% // note 2 NS3.x 31855 1.52% NS6.x 21671 1.03% Opera 17263 0.82% // note 3 IE4.x 8847 0.42% IE3.x 6365 0.30% NS2.x 2905 0.14% IE2.x 305 0.01% Lynx 156 0.01% Mosaic 3 0.00% //note 1: includes NS7.xx and all Mozilla builds but NO NS6. //note 2: includes robots //note 3: un-spoofed Opera only, spoofed Opera will be counted towards MSIE.

From above results: Netscape 43.36%, MSIE 53.1%, Netscape is only about 10 percent behind MSIE.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 (CK-SillyDog)

by **Antony** » Wed 09 Jul, 2003 4:28 am

SillyDog701 Traffic Report (June 2003)
All right guys, this is some selected traffic data of SillyDog701.
Those data are generated from accesslog (the accesslog itself is 421MB), not from third party's image tracking.
Time Period: 1st June, 2003, 06:00:37 AM to 1st July, 2003, 06:35:03 AM (AEST)
Total Hits: 2053723 (2million)
Unique IP addresses: 41605
Total Data Transferred: 10.67 GB (HTTP only)

SillyDog701 FTP transferred 83.96 GB of traffic during this month. (FTP only)

Data analysed by FastStatsAnalyzer.

Web Browsers: (http connections only, FTP traffic is not included.)

Code: Select all: (hits) (percentage) IE6.x 835843 40.92% NS5.x 659638 32.29% // note 1 IE5.x 251965 12.33% NS4.x 164465 8.05% Other 45997 2.25% // note 2 NS3.x 30079 1.47% Opera 20784 1.02% // note 3 NS6.x 17477 0.86% // note 3 IE4.x 6909 0.34% IE3.x 6892 0.34% NS2.x 2188 0.11% IE2.x 324 0.02% Lynx 150 0.01% Mosaic 1 0.00% //note 1: includes NS7.xx and all Mozilla builds but NO NS6. //note 2: includes robots //note 3: un-spoofed Opera only, spoofed Opera will be counted towards MSIE.

From above results: Netscape 42.78%, MSIE 53.95%, again Netscape is only about 10 percent behind MSIE.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 (CK-SillyDog)

by **Edward** » Wed 09 Jul, 2003 6:59 am

Even if Opera is spoofed as Mozilla 3, 4.78, or 5, it's still recognized by the site as MSIE?

UserAgent: Opera/7.11 (Linux 2.4.20-4GB i586; U) [en]

SillyDog701

SillyDog701 Traffic Report

February 2003 Traffic Report

March 2003 Traffic Report

Um...people....not to be a spoilsport, BUT...

SillyDog701 May 2003 Traffic Report

SillyDog701 June 2003 Traffic Report

Who is online