SillyDog701

by **Antony** » Tue 02 Dec, 2003 9:02 pm

Edward wrote:I can't recall if I asked this before, but what is that reference to Netscape 6.x in the listing??? Was there a Mozilla/6.0 that was never released, or is that the actual version 6 of Netscape?

The actual version of Netscape 6, obviously by checking the Netscape 6 in the UserAgent string.
And before you ask... why not checking for Netscape 7? You have to blame the software. I can't configure that.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) (CK-SillyDog)

by **Antony** » Sun 04 Jan, 2004 11:37 pm

SillyDog701 Traffic Report (December 2003)

SillyDog701's traffic data, sillydog.org domain only.
Those data are generated from accesslog (the accesslog itself is 701MB), not from third party's image tracking.
Time Period: 1st December, 2003, 06:00:43 AM to 1st January, 2003, 06:23:43 AM (AEST)
Total Hits: 3246053 (3.2 million)
(page hits: 699143, i.e. 0.7 million)
Unique IP addresses: 115427
Total Data Transferred: 18.46 GB (HTTP only)

Data analysed by FastStatsAnalyzer.

Web Browsers: (http connections only, FTP traffic is not included.)

Code: Select all: (hits) (percentage) IE6.x 1561437 48.18% NS5.x 991047 30.58% // note 1 IE5.x 353678 10.91% NS4.x 158140 4.88% Other 59462 1.83% // note 2 NS6.x 44127 1.36% NS3.x 26358 0.81% Opera 21686 0.67% // note 3 IE4.x 14906 0.46% IE3.x 6626 0.20% NS2.x 1644 0.05% IE2.x 1527 0.05% Lynx 174 0.01% Mosaic 67 0.00% //note 1: All Gecko-based, includes NS7.xx and all Mozilla builds, Camino and Safari but NOT NS6. //note 2: includes robots //note 3: un-spoofed Opera only, spoofed Opera will be counted towards MSIE or Netscape.

Netscape/Mozilla 37.68%, MSIE 59.8%
Despite the holiday sessions, we still have pretty busy traffic.

A very healthy result.

And the Operating Systems...
Win NT 42.87%
Win 2000 18.76%
Win 98 17.80%
:mac:

Macintosh 7.23%
Othe 4.19%
Win Me 3.80%
:tux:

Linux 3.17%
Win 95 1.88%
SunOS 0.18%
Win 3.1 0.07%
OS/2 0.02%
IRIX, WebTV, OSF1 all 0.01% each
HP-UX 124 hits (0.00%), WinCE 82 hits (0.00%)

During this period, we again have huge increase of hits. We are growing!

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) (CK-SillyDog)

by **Wellander** » Sun 04 Jan, 2004 11:40 pm

Hi,
Way to go Internet Explorer.

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98)

by **Lorraine** » Sun 04 Jan, 2004 11:54 pm

Just a thought ~ and if you take my posts and figure out the percentage, you should really count it as Netscape, as I am using IE 6.0 only because I haven't had time to remove the junk in my computer. Y'all know I like netscape/Firebird/Mozilla
:lol:

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)

by **Andrew T.** » Mon 05 Jan, 2004 11:39 pm

An interesting set of statistics. It's a little depressing that the proportion of Internet Explorer traffic in December 2003 was so high (a sizable difference, anyway, from the traffic of December 2002), but I assume the percentage would be at a more reasonable level if Opera users and Lorraine's visits were deducted. Still, IE users couldn't have chosen a better site to visit: Sillydog.org is the ideal place for these users to come to and be encouraged to switch to Netscape or Mozilla!

As for the record high of 67 hits from Mosaic users, I'll bet that I was partially responsible. (Screen shot)

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

by **DJGM** » Tue 06 Jan, 2004 10:33 am

Andrew T. wrote:Sillydog.org is the ideal place for these users to come to
and be encouraged to switch to Netscape or Mozilla!

As I've said before, IE users are welcome here, so they can learn the error of their ways!

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/85.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/85.6

by **Antony** » Wed 04 Feb, 2004 8:12 pm

SillyDog701 Traffic Report (January 2004)

SillyDog701's traffic data, sillydog.org domain only.
Those data are generated from accesslog (the accesslog itself is 613MB), not from third party's image tracking.
Time Period: 1st December, 2003, 06:00:43 AM to 1st January, 2003, 06:23:43 AM (AEST)
Total Hits: 2844265 (2.8 million)
(page hits: 610524, i.e. 0.6 million)
Unique IP addresses: 86135
Total Data Transferred: 16.43 GB (HTTP only)

Data analysed by FastStatsAnalyzer.

Web Browsers: (http connections only, FTP traffic is not included.)

Code: Select all: (hits) (percentage) IE6.x 1338155 47.10% NS5.x 900610 31.70% // note 1 IE5.x 303234 10.67% NS4.x 163448 5.75% Other 42743 1.50% // note 2 NS6.x 26914 0.95% NS3.x 24057 0.85% Opera 17788 0.63% // note 3 IE4.x 14540 0.51% IE3.x 5974 0.21% NS2.x 2257 0.08% IE2.x 1261 0.02% Mosaic 196 0.01% Lynx 170 0.01% //note 1: All Gecko-based, includes NS7.xx and all Mozilla builds, Camino and Safari but NOT NS6. //note 2: includes robots //note 3: un-spoofed Opera only, spoofed Opera will be counted towards MSIE or Netscape.

Despite the holiday sessions, we still have pretty busy traffic.

A very healthy result.

And the Operating Systems...
Win NT 42.61%
Win 2000 18.64%
Win 98 17.11%
:mac:

Macintosh 7.94%
Othe 4.11%
Win Me 3.35%
:tux:

Linux 3.17%
Win 95 2.79%
SunOS 0.17%
Win 3.1 0.06%
OS/2 0.01%
IRIX, WebTV, WinCE all 0.01% each

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) (CK-SillyDog)

by **Andrew T.** » Wed 04 Feb, 2004 9:04 pm

Do the site statistics reflect a total of visits to all pages within the sillydog.org domain, including forum traffic?

I made a graph of SillyDog701 traffic by web browser since September 2002. (14k)

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 MultiZilla/1.6.1.1c

by **Antony** » Wed 04 Feb, 2004 9:10 pm

Andrew T. wrote:Do the site statistics reflect a total of visits to all pages within the sillydog.org domain, including forum traffic?

Yes, all HTTP connections, including all subdomains and directories of SillyDog701.

Thanks for the nice graph.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) (CK-SillyDog)

by **Wellander** » Wed 04 Feb, 2004 11:26 pm

Hi,
Way to go Internet explorer again.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

by **DJGM** » Thu 05 Feb, 2004 12:03 am

Wellander wrote:Hi,
Way to go Internet explorer again.

Just to remind you that some of us here actively discourage the use of Internet Exploiter,
whilst encouraging IE users to switch to real browsers like Mozilla, Netscape or Opera . . .

Kindly refrain from encouraging the use of Microsoft's pathetic excuse for a web browser.

That is all.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

by **Mandrake** » Thu 05 Feb, 2004 6:06 am

Yes, we do encourage people to use browsers. Mozilla, Opera and Netscape are all very good browsers. These browsers are much more secure and have many more features when compared to IE.

IE isn't a browser, it's an OS Component!

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

by **Edward** » Fri 06 Feb, 2004 9:12 pm

Between December 2003 and January 2004, there was a drop in the percentage of Internet Explorer 6 hits.

Andrew - Excellent graph!

UserAgent: Opera/7.23 (X11; Linux i586; U) [en]

by **Edward** » Sat 07 Feb, 2004 7:45 am

Antony,

If a web browser like Konqueror (for Linux) is used, how are those statistics compiled? Do these come under Netscape or something else?

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.1; Linux 2.4.21-166-default; X11; i586; en, US, en_US)

by **Mandrake** » Sat 07 Feb, 2004 8:56 am

Konqueror has Mozilla/5.0 in the UA string, thus, like Safari, it would included in with Mozilla and Netscape.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

SillyDog701

SillyDog701 Traffic Report

Re: SillyDog701 December 2003 Traffic Report

SillyDog701 January 2004 Traffic Report

Who is online