SillyDog701 Traffic Report

Our lounge for socialising and for all general topics in good taste. Including all SillyDog701 related issues.

Moderators: profman, Edward, Mandrake

SillyDog701 February 2004 Traffic Report

Postby Antony » Mon 01 Mar, 2004 3:05 am

SillyDog701 Traffic Report (February 2004)

SillyDog701's traffic data, sillydog.org domain only.
Those data are generated from accesslog (the accesslog itself is 663MB), not from third party's image tracking.
Time Period: 1st February, 2004, 06:00:29 AM to 1st March, 2004, 06:24:26 AM (AEDST)
Total Hits: 3049113 (3 million)
(page hits: 638261, i.e. 0.6 million)
Unique IP addresses: 91901
Total Data Transferred: 17.74 GB (HTTP only)

Data analysed by FastStatsAnalyzer.

Web Browsers: (http connections only, FTP traffic is not included.)
Code: Select all
       (hits) (percentage)
IE6.x 1484385  48.75%
NS5.x  964000  31.66%  // note 1
IE5.x  299903   9.85%
NS4.x  170416   5.60%
Other   39123   1.28%  // note 2
NS3.x   24867   0.82%
NS6.x   23099   0.76%
Opera   17835   0.59%  // note 3
IE4.x   12754   0.42%
IE3.x    5525   0.18%
NS2.x    1862   0.06%
IE2.x     897   0.03%
Lynx      227   0.01%
Mosaic      0
//note 1: All Gecko-based, includes NS7.xx and all Mozilla builds, Camino and Safari but NOT NS6.
//note 2: includes robots
//note 3: un-spoofed Opera only, spoofed Opera will be counted towards MSIE or Netscape.


29 days in February, we had more than 3 million hits.

A very healthy result.

And the Operating Systems...
Win NT 44.86%
Win 2000 18.81%
Win 98 14.69%
:mac:Macintosh 8.16%, an increase
Othe 3.48%
Win Me 3.32%
:tux: Linux 3.20%
Win 95 3.18%
SunOS 0.18%
Win 3.1 0.06%
OS/2 0.02%
WebTV 0.02%
IRIX, HP-UX, WinCE all 0.01% each. OSF1 80 hits (0.00%)

Still near 90% of users are Windows users.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) (CK-SillyDog)
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14930
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Wellander » Mon 01 Mar, 2004 3:19 pm

Hi,
Way to go Internet Explorer.
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0)
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm

Postby Andrew T. » Tue 02 Mar, 2004 6:00 pm

This is the first time the total number of statistics for Mozilla (and everything else grouped together as "NS5.x") is evenly divisible by 1000.
It's also interesting to see that the marketshare for Windows 95 has been slowly increasing over the last four months.

Time to update that graph again!

Edit: Heeding Antony's suggestion below, I re-labeled the legend, and decided to change the color as well.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
Last edited by Andrew T. on Tue 02 Mar, 2004 6:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Andrew T.
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Fri 14 Mar, 2003 11:37 pm
Location: Somewhere beyond the sea

Postby Antony » Tue 02 Mar, 2004 6:13 pm

Andrew T. wrote:Time to update that graph again!
Very nice graph, thanks again.
Just a suggestion, can you slightly re-label the legend?
For example, it might be easier for people to understand when you use
Netscape 4.x instead of Mozilla/4
Navigator 3.x instead of Mozilla/3
Navigator 2.x instead of Mozilla/2
Netscape 6.x instead of Mozilla/6

And you can combine "Mozilla/6" into "Mozilla/5" group, since it was actually Mozilla/5 with Netscape 6 string in the UserAgent string.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/85.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/85.6
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14930
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby DJGM » Tue 02 Mar, 2004 9:41 pm

Wellander wrote:Hi,
Way to go Internet Explorer.


Internet Explorer . . . just go . . . away!
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4624
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK

SillyDog701 March 2004 Traffic Report

Postby Antony » Thu 01 Apr, 2004 11:31 pm

SillyDog701 Traffic Report (March 2004)

SillyDog701's traffic data, sillydog.org domain only.
Those data are generated from accesslog (the accesslog itself is 723MB), not from third party's image tracking.
Time Period: 1st March, 2004, 06:00:08 AM (AEDST) to 1st April, 2004, 06:24:00 AM (AEST)
Total Hits: 3316730 (3.3 million)
(page hits: 664632, i.e. 0.66 million)
Unique IP addresses: 98808Total Data Transferred: 19.29 GB (HTTP only)

Data analysed by FastStatsAnalyzer.

Web Browsers: (http connections only, FTP traffic is not included.)
Code: Select all
       (hits) (percentage)
IE6.x 1647896  49.75%
NS5.x 1035865  31.27%  // note 1
IE5.x  308651   9.32%
NS4.x  173066   5.22%
Other   47990   1.45%  // note 2
NS3.x   28907   0.87%
NS6.x   26970   0.81%
Opera   18279   0.55%  // note 3
IE4.x   13944   0.42%
IE3.x    6683   0.20%
NS2.x    2512   0.08%
IE2.x    1236   0.04%
Mosaic    263   0.01%
Lynx      227   0.01%
//note 1: All Gecko-based browsers, including those identify
themselves as Gecko-based. This includes NS7.xx and all Mozilla
builds, Camino, Konqueror and Safari but NOT NS6.
//note 2: includes robots
//note 3: un-spoofed Opera only, spoofed Opera will be counted towards MSIE or Netscape.


we had more than 3.3 million hits. We also see the increase in usage of MSIE browsers

A very healthy result.

And the Operating Systems...
Win NT 45.27%
Win 2000 18.20%
Win 98 14.15%
:mac:Macintosh 8.32%, an increase
Othe 3.77%
Win 95 3.52%
Win Me 3.31%
:tux: Linux 3.20%
SunOS 0.19%
Win 3.1 0.03%
OS/2 0.02%

Still near 90% of users are Windows users.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) (CK-SillyDog)
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14930
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Wellander » Fri 02 Apr, 2004 1:52 am

Hi,
Whay to go Internet Explorer.
We Love that browser.
Also What are robots I still do not understand that one?
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98)
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm

Postby DJGM » Fri 02 Apr, 2004 2:06 pm

Wellander,


Please change the record, you're getting boring now.

We don't love IE, you're the only one that does!
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4624
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK

Postby Andrew T. » Fri 02 Apr, 2004 3:46 pm

Mozilla (and everything else with UAs starting with "Mozilla/5.0") and Internet Explorer 6 traffic both increased almost at the exact same rates from March to April as they did from February to March.
Also, Windows 98 and Windows ME use is on a trend going down, while surprisingly Windows 95 continues to (slowly) increase in percentage. Last month, we had slightly more Windows 95 traffic than that of Windows ME.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
User avatar
Andrew T.
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Fri 14 Mar, 2003 11:37 pm
Location: Somewhere beyond the sea

Postby Andrew T. » Fri 02 Apr, 2004 8:13 pm

djv1 wrote:
DJGM wrote:Wellander,


Please change the record, you're getting boring now.

We don't love IE, you're the only one that does!


Theres nothing wrong with IE

...aside from numerous unpatched security holes, the utilization of dangerously insecure and proprietary ActiveX and VBS technologies, an obsolete rendering engine that hasn't changed significantly since IE 4.0, inferior rendering capability, the lack of up-to-date CSS support or features found in all competing products such as pop-up-blocking, or non-compliance with the HTTP protocol! :)

There are other threads in which the merits of IE have been discussed, so let's not drift this thread more off-topic.

(Edit by Andrew T. (25-12-2004): Quote added)
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
Last edited by Andrew T. on Sat 25 Dec, 2004 2:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Andrew T.
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Fri 14 Mar, 2003 11:37 pm
Location: Somewhere beyond the sea

Postby wolverine » Mon 05 Apr, 2004 10:34 pm

I loved netscape then gave ie a try with xp and got burnt when I had these browser hijacking over and over and culd never remove it even with spyware removers. I gave up on internet explorer and went with netscape 6.23 then went to 7.0 then jumped to 7.1. I did not look back to internet explorer if I jump from netscape it will be to firefox or mozilla instead of ie.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
wolverine
member
member
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon 05 Apr, 2004 9:14 pm

Postby wolverine » Tue 13 Apr, 2004 11:38 pm

Wellander wrote:Hi,
Whay to go Internet Explorer.
We Love that browser.
Also What are robots I still do not understand that one?


Robots are usually programs the scan pages to be indexed for search engines or they are programs that scan for email addresses to spam. There are other robots as well but right now cannot think of them.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
wolverine
member
member
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon 05 Apr, 2004 9:14 pm

SillyDog701 April 2004 Traffic Report

Postby Antony » Thu 06 May, 2004 12:43 am

SillyDog701 Traffic Report (March 2004)

SillyDog701's traffic data, sillydog.org domain only.
Those data are generated from accesslog (the accesslog itself is 639MB), not from third party's image tracking.
Time Period: 6th April, 2004, (note, I lost the first few days of the log) to 1st May, 2004, 03:01:49 AM (AEST)
Total Hits: 2975959 (2.9 million)
(page hits: 625003, i.e. 0.62 million)
Unique IP addresses: 89330
Total Data Transferred: 17.61 GB (HTTP only)

Data analysed by FastStatsAnalyzer.

Web Browsers: (http connections only, FTP traffic is not included.)
Code: Select all
       (hits) (percentage)
IE6.x 1552351  52.23%
NS5.x  945786  31.82%  // note 1
IE5.x  253888   8.54%
NS4.x   91024   3.06%
Other   44243   1.49%  // note 2
NS6.x   28192   0.95%
Opera   21114   0.71%  // note 3
NS3.x   19383   0.65%
IE4.x    8685   0.29%
IE3.x    5019   0.17%
NS2.x    1639   0.05%
IE2.x     642   0.02%
Lynx      334   0.01%
Mosaic     73   0.01%
//note 1: All Gecko-based browsers, including those identify
themselves as Gecko-based. This includes NS7.xx and all Mozilla
builds, Camino, Konqueror and Safari but NOT NS6.
//note 2: includes robots
//note 3: un-spoofed Opera only, spoofed Opera will be counted towards MSIE or Netscape.


we had more than 2.9 million hits without the first 5 days of traffic log.

A very healthy result.

And the top Operating Systems...
Win NT 49.12%
Win 2000 18.20%
Win 98 13.04%
:mac:Macintosh 7.15%
:tux: Linux 3.49%
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/124 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.1
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14930
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Wellander » Thu 06 May, 2004 12:50 am

Hi,
What happen to those days?
And good job Internet Explorer.
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 98)
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm

Postby Antony » Thu 06 May, 2004 12:53 am

Wellander wrote:Hi,
What happen to those days?
I forgot to retrieve the access_log when I moved away from previous hosting company to this new one.
If you are good at math, you can still project the data.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/124 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.1
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14930
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

PreviousNext

Return to SillyDog701 Lounge

Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot]