SillyDog701 Traffic Report

[Ron Williams]

Who is the one IP address? BTW good job Mozilla

Izanbardprince, ComradeXP, Petey, and all the other names that izanbard had.

Not surprising that he was banned.

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)

[Al]

yes, not surprising at all.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041108 Firefox/1.0

[Andrew T.]

Graphs:
Browser share by percentage
Browser share by hits
Total hits

Mozilla and its derivatives were on top again in January. In fact, the total "NS5.x" market share has been more than that of Internet Explorer the last three months in a row.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0

[Antony]

This is a testing report of SillyDog701 traffic using Analog software ( http://analog.cx/ ), and the for testing purpose I picked the smallest traffic file to run. (traffic files after March 2005).

SillyDog701 Traffic Report (April 2005) Testing Report

SillyDog701's traffic
Those data are generated from accesslog, not from third party's image tracking.
Time Period: Thu, Mar 31 2005 at 3:41 PM to Sat, Apr 30 2005 at 5:49 PM (30.09 days).
Total Hits: 3,812,050
Unique IP addresses: 12216

Data analysed by Analog.

Web Browsers: (http connections only, FTP traffic is not included.)

Code: Select all

(hits) (percentage)
1773702  46.61%   MSIE
 948752  24.93%   Firefox
 381892  10.04%   Netscape
 153738   4.04%   Mozilla
 176573   4.64%   Safari
  14748   0.39%   Googlebot
  86902   2.28%   Opera
  22858   0.60%   msnbot
   1745   0.05%   Missigua Locator 1.9
   1085   0.03%   Java
  39042   1.03%   Mediapartners-Google
  12748   0.34%   Konqueror
    998   0.03%   IRLbot
    795   0.02%   ichiro
   4106   0.11%   ia_archiver
    617   0.02%   aipbot
    614   0.02%   Speedy Spider (Beta
   8581   0.23%   Camino
  82364   2.16%   Netscape (compatible)
[not listed: 534 browsers]

Not sure if this software is better.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/412.6.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/412.2.2

[Andrew T.]

I have mixed feelings. On one hand, it's good to be able to see for once what the proportions of users using browsers like Mozilla Firefox, Mozilla, Konqueror, and Safari are for once; on the other hand, it would help to be able to break them down by version. I would be highly interested in finding out how popular Netscape 8 is among visitors, for example.

Also, I'm a bit unsure of the accuracy of the new service's charting tools. Nearly 25% of visitors use Mozilla Firefox--making it by far the most popular browser here outside of IE--yet its slice in the pie chart looks closer to 10%. Likewise, the slice for "Netscape (compatible)," whatever that indicates, is much too large.
Finally, what on earth is "puf?" It doesn't appear in the list.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6

[Antony]

on the other hand, it would help to be able to break them down by version. I would be highly interested in finding out how popular Netscape 8 is among visitors, for example.

It has this feature, but the list was too long... so I omit those.
(it goes by major version numbers.)
(besides I have to fix the white space for each line. )

Finally, what on earth is "puf?" It doesn't appear in the list.

No idea.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/412.6.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/412.2.2

[Antony]

I have mixed feelings. On one hand, it's good to be able to see for once what the proportions of users using browsers like Mozilla Firefox, Mozilla, Konqueror, and Safari are for once; on the other hand, it would help to be able to break them down by version. I would be highly interested in finding out how popular Netscape 8 is among visitors, for example.

Okay,
This is the copy of the output with HTML tags stripped.

Code: Select all

Listing the top 20 browsers by the number of requests for pages, sorted by the number of requests for pages.

1773702   46.61%   MSIE
1580045   41.52%   MSIE/6
169071    4.44%   MSIE/5
19835    0.52%   MSIE/4
3931    0.10%   MSIE/3
501    0.01%   MSIE/2
948752   24.93%   Firefox
880875   23.15%   Firefox/1
67745    1.78%   Firefox/0
82364    2.16%   Netscape (compatible)
39709    1.04%   puf
39709    1.04%   puf/0
381892   10.04%   Netscape
296237    7.78%   Netscape/7
53898    1.42%   Netscape/4
22749    0.60%   Netscape/6
5884    0.15%   Netscape/8
1669    0.04%   Netscape/3
638    0.02%   Netscape/2
112       Netscape/1
22858    0.60%   msnbot
22858    0.60%   msnbot/1
153738    4.04%   Mozilla
149709    3.93%   Mozilla/1
600    0.02%   Mozilla/0
176573    4.64%   Safari
99288    2.61%   Safari/125
60191    1.58%   Safari/312
7985    0.21%   Safari/85
5899    0.16%   Safari/412
1258    0.03%   Safari/100
14748    0.39%   Googlebot
14748    0.39%   Googlebot/2
86902    2.28%   Opera
42928    1.13%   Opera/7
38876    1.02%   Opera/8
3043    0.08%   Opera/5
1476    0.04%   Opera/6
561    0.01%   Opera/3
1745    0.05%   Missigua Locator 1.9
1085    0.03%   Java
1085    0.03%   Java/1
39042    1.03%   Mediapartners-Google
39042    1.03%   Mediapartners-Google/2
12748    0.34%   Konqueror
12306    0.32%   Konqueror/3
426    0.01%   Konqueror/2
998    0.03%   IRLbot
998    0.03%   IRLbot/1
795    0.02%   ichiro
795    0.02%   ichiro/1
4106    0.11%   ia_archiver
617    0.02%   aipbot
617    0.02%   aipbot/1
614    0.02%   Speedy Spider (Beta
599    0.02%   Speedy Spider (Beta/1
15       Speedy Spider (Beta/0
8581    0.23%   Camino
8581    0.23%   Camino/0
53782    1.41%   [not listed: 534 browsers]

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/412.6.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/412.2.2

[Andrew T.]

Gee, a lot more visitors use Netscape 4 and Netscape 6 than Netscape 8.

Of course, these statistics are from before the final version of Netscape 8 was released, so it isn't a totally fair comparison.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6

[Edward]

Finally, what on earth is "puf?" It doesn't appear in the list.

No idea.

puf Parallel URL fetcher

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20050816 SeaMonkey/1.0a

[Edward]

Where would the SeaMonkey suite fit in above, under "Mozilla/1"?

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20050816 SeaMonkey/1.0a

[Antony]

Where would the SeaMonkey suite fit in above, under "Mozilla/1"?

Yes.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/412.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/412.5

[Edward]

Anything on September's traffic?

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050920 Firefox/1.0.7

[Antony]

SillyDog701 Traffic Report (May 2005)

SillyDog701's traffic
Those data are generated from accesslog (the accesslog itself is 986MB), not from third party's image tracking.
Time Period: April 30, 2005, 11:49:35 PM to June 01, 2005, 12:10:09 AM
Total Hits: 4548575 (4.5 million)
(page hits: 1028286, i.e. 1.02 million)
Unique IP addresses: 121139

Data analysed by FastStatsAnalyzer.

Web Browsers: (http connections only, FTP traffic is not included.)

Code: Select all

       (hits) (percentage)
NS5.x 2188852  48.24%  // note 1
IE6.x 1841850  40.59%
Other  179827   3.96%  // note 2
IE5.x  162684   3.59%
NS4.x   85684   1.89%
Opera   33807   0.75%  // note 3
IE4.x   15324   0.34%
NS3.x   13545   0.30%
NS6.x    9575   0.21%
IE3.x    4169   0.09%
NS2.x     858   0.02%
IE2.x     835   0.02%
Lynx      336   0.01%
//note 1: All Gecko-based browsers, including those identify
 themselves as Gecko-based. This includes NS7.xx and all Mozilla
 builds, Camino, Konqueror and Safari but NOT NS6.
//note 2: includes bots and some (but not massive) phpBB attacks.
//note 3: un-spoofed Opera only, spoofed Opera will be counted towards MSIE or Netscape.

And the platform shares...
Windows NT (and XP) 59.32%
Macintosh 11.13%
Windows 2000 9.84%
Windows 98 7.19%
Linux 3.08%
WinMe 1.75%
Win95 0.74%

All Gecko based browsers (Netscape + Mozilla + Firefox) 50.66%
MSIE: 41.04%

Sadly, we still don't have 7 million hits, but we are running on a reliable server.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050519 Netscape/8.0.1

[Don_HH2K]

Wow, 986MB worth of hits in the log? Antony, how in the world do you archive those? Hopefully not raw!

HH2K usually ends up with only 500k worth of an Excel file containing the accesslog, combined stats, and a few graphs to show the stats in a way that I can easily read them. Of course, Excel compresses workbooks. September gave about 488k of hits and such in Excel, but the raw log I remember was nearly 3MB. The difference in our traffic is obvious!

...for those that do not believe that Excel can track web stats...

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 Donzilla/0.8PR2 (WML/1.3)

[Antony]

Wow, 986MB worth of hits in the log? Antony, how in the world do you archive those? Hopefully not raw!

Not that easy to be honest.
The gzipped raw accesslog file is usually about 70MB to 100MB, it's gzipped by the server. After analysing it, I gzip it back.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/412.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/412.5