UserAgent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.00
UserAgent string thread
Moderators: Antony, Edward, profman, Ramona
by iJohnE » Sun 06 Sep, 2009 12:41 pm
Edward wrote:Testing Opera 10.00 for Windows.
Can you print from it Edward?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/530.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/2.0.172.43 Safari/530.5
Desktop: HP-Compaq DC7600: Intel Pentium D 945 @ 3.40GHz, 4GB DDR2 800 RAM, 500GB HDD, 160GB HDD, . nVidia ION ,Windows 7 Ultimate.
Laptop: Dell Vostro 3750: Intel Core i3 @ 2.30Ghz, 6GB DDR3 RAM, 250GB HDD, Intel Integrated Graphics, Windows 7 Ultimate.
Laptop: Dell Vostro 3750: Intel Core i3 @ 2.30Ghz, 6GB DDR3 RAM, 250GB HDD, Intel Integrated Graphics, Windows 7 Ultimate.
-
iJohnE - diamond member
- Posts: 1472
- Joined: Wed 21 Nov, 2007 2:48 pm
- Location: Pulaski, NY, USA
by Edward » Sun 06 Sep, 2009 1:43 pm
The UA string for it looks funny as it technically has two different version numbers... I have since removed it as it would not detect some secure (https) web sites.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090823 SeaMonkey/1.1.18
-
Edward - Moderator
- Posts: 3584
- Joined: Sun 01 Dec, 2002 7:15 pm
by DJGM » Sun 06 Sep, 2009 4:34 pm
Indeed. The UA string on Opera 10 reports itself as "Opera/9.80" at the start, and "Version/10.00" at the end.
So, is it really Opera 10, or just Opera 9.8, but marketed as version 10. Does this prove that software version
numbers are little more than a marketing gimmick to "big up" the product, and don't really mean anything?
Even the UA string of Internet Explorer 8 reports "Trident/4.0" in it's UA string ... which pretty much proves
my old long standing argument that IE is still built with a 4th generation rendering engine first introduced
way back in 1997, while all other browsers have long since moved onto 5th gen (or better) engines . . .
Anyway, this thread isn't really meant for discussions, so I'm going to leave it at that.
So, is it really Opera 10, or just Opera 9.8, but marketed as version 10. Does this prove that software version
numbers are little more than a marketing gimmick to "big up" the product, and don't really mean anything?
Even the UA string of Internet Explorer 8 reports "Trident/4.0" in it's UA string ... which pretty much proves
my old long standing argument that IE is still built with a 4th generation rendering engine first introduced
way back in 1997, while all other browsers have long since moved onto 5th gen (or better) engines . . .
Anyway, this thread isn't really meant for discussions, so I'm going to leave it at that.
UserAgent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; U; en-GB) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.00
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
-
DJGM - diamond member
- Posts: 4572
- Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
- Location: Manchester, England, UK
by Don_HH2K » Sat 12 Sep, 2009 11:14 am
Firefox 3.5.3 64-bit (from here) on 7 Ultimate RC x64.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090910 Shiretoko/3.5.3
Laptop: HP Compaq nx6325 - Turion 64 X2 @ 2GHz, 2GB DDR2, 100GB HD, ATI Radeon X300, 15" LCD, Seven Pro
Handheld: Palm Treo 650 - Intel PXA270 @ 312MHz, 10MB RAM, 32MB flash, 2.7" LCD, Palm OS 5.4
Handheld: Palm Treo 650 - Intel PXA270 @ 312MHz, 10MB RAM, 32MB flash, 2.7" LCD, Palm OS 5.4
-
Don_HH2K - Moderator
- Posts: 5112
- Joined: Sun 09 May, 2004 3:59 pm
by iJohnE » Sun 13 Sep, 2009 8:19 pm
Testing from SeaMonkey 1.1.18 on Windows XP Home SP2.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 SeaMonkey/1.1.18
Desktop: HP-Compaq DC7600: Intel Pentium D 945 @ 3.40GHz, 4GB DDR2 800 RAM, 500GB HDD, 160GB HDD, . nVidia ION ,Windows 7 Ultimate.
Laptop: Dell Vostro 3750: Intel Core i3 @ 2.30Ghz, 6GB DDR3 RAM, 250GB HDD, Intel Integrated Graphics, Windows 7 Ultimate.
Laptop: Dell Vostro 3750: Intel Core i3 @ 2.30Ghz, 6GB DDR3 RAM, 250GB HDD, Intel Integrated Graphics, Windows 7 Ultimate.
-
iJohnE - diamond member
- Posts: 1472
- Joined: Wed 21 Nov, 2007 2:48 pm
- Location: Pulaski, NY, USA
by iJohnE » Wed 16 Sep, 2009 5:28 pm
Testing from Mozilla Firefox 3.5.2 on Windows XP.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090824 Firefox/3.5.3 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Desktop: HP-Compaq DC7600: Intel Pentium D 945 @ 3.40GHz, 4GB DDR2 800 RAM, 500GB HDD, 160GB HDD, . nVidia ION ,Windows 7 Ultimate.
Laptop: Dell Vostro 3750: Intel Core i3 @ 2.30Ghz, 6GB DDR3 RAM, 250GB HDD, Intel Integrated Graphics, Windows 7 Ultimate.
Laptop: Dell Vostro 3750: Intel Core i3 @ 2.30Ghz, 6GB DDR3 RAM, 250GB HDD, Intel Integrated Graphics, Windows 7 Ultimate.
-
iJohnE - diamond member
- Posts: 1472
- Joined: Wed 21 Nov, 2007 2:48 pm
- Location: Pulaski, NY, USA
by Mandrake » Sat 03 Oct, 2009 11:04 am
Safari 1.something on Mac OS X 10.3.9
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/312.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/312.6
Core i7 920 | ASUS P6T Deluxe v2 | 3TB+ HDD | 12GB Corsair DDR3 | Radeon 4890 Xfire | X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty | Logitech Z-5500 Speakers | Dell 3008WFP | Seven RC1
-
Mandrake - Moderator
- Posts: 4193
- Joined: Fri 13 Sep, 2002 6:35 am
by iJohnE » Sun 11 Oct, 2009 6:07 pm
Edward wrote:Testing Release Candidate 1 of SeaMonkey 2.0 for Linux.
Is this one of the next big steps before the official release of Seamonky 2.0?
How's it working for you?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.195.25 Safari/532.0
Desktop: HP-Compaq DC7600: Intel Pentium D 945 @ 3.40GHz, 4GB DDR2 800 RAM, 500GB HDD, 160GB HDD, . nVidia ION ,Windows 7 Ultimate.
Laptop: Dell Vostro 3750: Intel Core i3 @ 2.30Ghz, 6GB DDR3 RAM, 250GB HDD, Intel Integrated Graphics, Windows 7 Ultimate.
Laptop: Dell Vostro 3750: Intel Core i3 @ 2.30Ghz, 6GB DDR3 RAM, 250GB HDD, Intel Integrated Graphics, Windows 7 Ultimate.
-
iJohnE - diamond member
- Posts: 1472
- Joined: Wed 21 Nov, 2007 2:48 pm
- Location: Pulaski, NY, USA
by Edward » Sun 11 Oct, 2009 7:04 pm
iJohnE wrote:Edward wrote:Testing Release Candidate 1 of SeaMonkey 2.0 for Linux.
Is this one of the next big steps before the official release of Seamonky 2.0?
How's it working for you?
Yes and see here.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091007 SeaMonkey/2.0
-
Edward - Moderator
- Posts: 3584
- Joined: Sun 01 Dec, 2002 7:15 pm
by iJohnE » Tue 13 Oct, 2009 6:10 pm
Testing the SeaMonkey 2 Release Candidate 1 on Windows XP Home Edition. On a rea PC 
.
.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091007 SeaMonkey/2.0
Last edited by iJohnE on Tue 13 Oct, 2009 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Desktop: HP-Compaq DC7600: Intel Pentium D 945 @ 3.40GHz, 4GB DDR2 800 RAM, 500GB HDD, 160GB HDD, . nVidia ION ,Windows 7 Ultimate.
Laptop: Dell Vostro 3750: Intel Core i3 @ 2.30Ghz, 6GB DDR3 RAM, 250GB HDD, Intel Integrated Graphics, Windows 7 Ultimate.
Laptop: Dell Vostro 3750: Intel Core i3 @ 2.30Ghz, 6GB DDR3 RAM, 250GB HDD, Intel Integrated Graphics, Windows 7 Ultimate.
-
iJohnE - diamond member
- Posts: 1472
- Joined: Wed 21 Nov, 2007 2:48 pm
- Location: Pulaski, NY, USA
Return to Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape
Who is online
Registered users: Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]
