SillyDog701

Message Centre 3.0

Skip to content

Apple Safari now on Windows

Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, Camino, Mozilla, Netscape 6/7/8/9, and all Gecko-based browsers discussion and support forum.
(MozInfo701, Netscape Browser Archive)

Moderators: Antony, Edward, profman, Ramona

Post a reply

Apple Safari now on Windows

Postby Dr Lobster* » Mon 11 Jun, 2007 1:42 pm

cool, giving a it a try now..

http://www.apple.com/safari/
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070515 Firefox/2.0.0.4
Dr Lobster*
super member
super member
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon 29 May, 2006 3:46 pm
Location: Norfolk, UK
Top

Postby Pu7o » Mon 11 Jun, 2007 1:48 pm

Buggiest browser ever. It can't even render SD701 right.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.5pre) Gecko/20070604 Firefox/2.0.0.4 Navigator/9.0b1
User avatar
Pu7o
Macfox
Macfox
 
Posts: 2014
Joined: Thu 06 Jan, 2005 12:03 pm
Location: Portugal
Top

Postby Dr Lobster* » Mon 11 Jun, 2007 1:49 pm

i like the font smoothing, you're right though it's a bit buggy at the moment.

is it possible to use mouse gestures and block adverts in safari ?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070515 Firefox/2.0.0.4
Dr Lobster*
super member
super member
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon 29 May, 2006 3:46 pm
Location: Norfolk, UK
Top

Postby Dr Lobster* » Mon 11 Jun, 2007 1:51 pm

also, you can't seem to use a proxy server at the moment.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070515 Firefox/2.0.0.4
Dr Lobster*
super member
super member
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon 29 May, 2006 3:46 pm
Location: Norfolk, UK
Top

Postby James » Mon 11 Jun, 2007 1:58 pm

Well... I'm tempted but your caution on it being buggy has made me hesitate. In what respect is it buggy? How difficult would it be to entirely eradicate it (without messing with the registry) should it prove troublesome? I took the "tour" and I curious about the claim that it renders pages considerably faster than FF, IE and Opera. How did you find this claim?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070515 Firefox/2.0.0.4
James
User avatar
James
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2707
Joined: Sat 13 Jul, 2002 12:10 am
Location: Pacific NW USA
Top

Postby Fulvio » Mon 11 Jun, 2007 2:01 pm

I was never prompted to import settings. All my bookmarks folders are empty, and there is no way to type in the URL bar. Other than that I get the Apple page. I thought that they may give a minimum of guidance. May be there is something which I missed, but there is not much to see. Toolbars are totally empty.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.5pre) Gecko/20070604 Firefox/2.0.0.4 Navigator/9.0b1
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, SM2.9.1, FF12, TB12.0.1, IE8.0, Google Chrome18, Ghostwall , Avast 7.x, JRE1.7_04. Testing FF13b4
User avatar
Fulvio
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11916
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 10:08 am
Top

Postby Dr Lobster* » Mon 11 Jun, 2007 2:05 pm

it's actually very slow, i've had a look at a couple of other forums and other users experience the same thing, memory usage is high and you can't use a proxy.

not bad though, font rendering is lovely, interface is a bit sluggish but it is a beta so it will get better, this is quite an exciting development- it makes mozilla and microsoft raise the bar - we all benefit from this.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en) AppleWebKit/522.11.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Safari/522.11.3
Dr Lobster*
super member
super member
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon 29 May, 2006 3:46 pm
Location: Norfolk, UK
Top

Postby Dr Lobster* » Mon 11 Jun, 2007 2:07 pm

also, page rendering is a bit funny sometimes, it's almost as though it isn't using the stylesheet on some pages.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en) AppleWebKit/522.11.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Safari/522.11.3
Dr Lobster*
super member
super member
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon 29 May, 2006 3:46 pm
Location: Norfolk, UK
Top

Postby James » Mon 11 Jun, 2007 2:16 pm

That being the case, I'll forego the experiment and watch from the sidelines. Discretion is the better part of valor... eh?! :wink:
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070515 Firefox/2.0.0.4
James
User avatar
James
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2707
Joined: Sat 13 Jul, 2002 12:10 am
Location: Pacific NW USA
Top

Postby Pu7o » Mon 11 Jun, 2007 2:46 pm

Well, apparently, I found the problem. It seems that Safari/win doesn't render bold text at all, making therefore half the text on pretty much any page disappear.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.5pre) Gecko/20070604 Firefox/2.0.0.4 Navigator/9.0b1
User avatar
Pu7o
Macfox
Macfox
 
Posts: 2014
Joined: Thu 06 Jan, 2005 12:03 pm
Location: Portugal
Top

Postby richard mitnick » Mon 11 Jun, 2007 2:48 pm

Well, I am not going to encounter any pf the problems you folks had, because on my Vista Business machine it would not even install. It encountered Error 3328 or some such B.S.

>>RSM
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.5pre) Gecko/20070604 Firefox/2.0.0.4 Navigator/9.0b1
User avatar
richard mitnick
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1477
Joined: Mon 25 Apr, 2005 10:46 am
Location: Highland Park, New Jersey
Top

Postby beanboy89 » Mon 11 Jun, 2007 3:01 pm

From what I've read over at Neowin, page rendering seems to be incredibly buggy and the interface seems to be sluggish. I'll stay away from this for now.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070222 SeaMonkey/1.1.1
User avatar
beanboy89
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1650
Joined: Sun 16 May, 2004 8:56 am
Top

Postby SSS » Mon 11 Jun, 2007 4:31 pm

I just downloaded Safari for Windows. I like it.

EDIT: For some reason it just cut off my post. :-\
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en) AppleWebKit/522.11.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Safari/522.11.3
Last edited by SSS on Mon 11 Jun, 2007 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SSS
silver member
silver member
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Fri 21 Mar, 2003 2:03 pm
Top

Postby Antony » Mon 11 Jun, 2007 6:08 pm

Pu7o wrote:Buggiest browser ever. It can't even render SD701 right.

It's public beta (on Windows), what do you expect?

Get a Mac!
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070515 Firefox/2.0.0.4
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14510
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Top

Postby beanboy89 » Mon 11 Jun, 2007 6:39 pm

Antony wrote:
Pu7o wrote:Buggiest browser ever. It can't even render SD701 right.

It's public beta (on Windows), what do you expect?


Beta? From everything I've heard about the Windows version, it doesn't deserve the "beta" designation. Realistically, it could be called an alpha or pre-alpha, IMO.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070222 SeaMonkey/1.1.1
User avatar
beanboy89
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1650
Joined: Sun 16 May, 2004 8:56 am
Top
Next
Post a reply

Return to Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape

Who is online

Registered users: Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Cheap Web Hosting

support SillyDog701
[SillyDog701 home] [Netscape] [download NS] [MozInfo701] [MacCentre701] [Feedback] [Search] [Sitemap]
All messages posted in this forum do not necessarily represent SillyDog701. This forum is operated by Antony Shen. All rights reserved. Copyright Notice. Privacy Statement.		 get FirefoxMade on a Mac