IE Tab not installing in SeaMonkey.

Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, Camino, Mozilla, Netscape 6/7/8/9, and all Gecko-based browsers discussion and support forum.
(MozInfo701, Netscape Browser Archive)

Moderators: Antony, Edward, profman, Ramona

IE Tab not installing in SeaMonkey.

Postby iJohnE » Sun 27 Apr, 2008 6:52 pm

Hey all,

I just downloaded SeaMonkey for my Vista Machine, after having to re-install Vista.

I have IE-Tab installed for SM on my XP, and it works seamlessly.

But, I went to the Mozilla.org add on page, and get the "install script not found" message again.
This seems to only happen on this version of windows.

Any help appreciated.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9
Desktop: HP-Compaq DC7600: Intel Pentium D 945 @ 3.40GHz, 4GB DDR2 800 RAM, 500GB HDD, 160GB HDD, . nVidia ION ,Windows 7 Ultimate.
Laptop: Dell Studio 1537: Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 @ 2.0Ghz, 4GB DDR2 800 RAM, 320GB HDD, Intel Integrated Mobile 4 Graphics, Windows 7 Ultimate.
User avatar
iJohnE
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 21 Nov, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Pulaski, NY, USA

Postby humpd » Tue 29 Apr, 2008 9:23 am

My guess is that the problem is with Vista. I know a number of folks who have had nightmares with Vista, some of whom have gone back to XP. I was not aware that the IE tab worked with SeaMonkey. You learn something new every day.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14
Windows 7, Norton Internet Security, Malwarebytes, Spywareblaster for my desktop and Avast for the laptop, user of Chrome and Firefox 9.01.
humpd
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Thu 25 Jul, 2002 9:37 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Postby Fulvio » Tue 29 Apr, 2008 9:57 am

IE Tab v.1.3.3. is installed in my SM1.1.9. And, I don't have to play azny trick to make it install. However, new Firefox builds, as well as Seamonkey will not allow installation , even in presence of Nightly Tester Tools or Mr Tech Local Install. In fact, Firefox4.0a1pre will not accept any add-on.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, FF10, SM2.7, TB10, IE8.0, PC Tools Firewall , Avast 6.x, JRE1.7_02
User avatar
Fulvio
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11827
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 10:08 am

Postby humpd » Tue 29 Apr, 2008 10:07 am

Fulvio: I have to wonder why the latest builds of FF will not allow add-ons like IE tab. That really makes no sense to be. In my opinion, allowing add-ons is one of the best reasons for using FF in addtion to its better security. In your opinion, will this "problem" be addressed by the time the final versions come out? I hope so.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14
Windows 7, Norton Internet Security, Malwarebytes, Spywareblaster for my desktop and Avast for the laptop, user of Chrome and Firefox 9.01.
humpd
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Thu 25 Jul, 2002 9:37 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Postby PaulD » Tue 29 Apr, 2008 1:03 pm

An observation and thought from a one-time coder -
It may be that some features, in this case add-ons, are temporarily disabled (either by design or by accident) because of some interface changes that are in the process of development. Until a release candidate is announced it may be less stressful to just hang in there and wait. They may also be changing, presumably for the better, some base code that will prove attractive later. All this is speculative on my part, of course.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080311 Firefox/2.0.0.13
PaulD
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Mon 14 Aug, 2006 5:52 pm

Postby Fulvio » Tue 29 Apr, 2008 1:14 pm

humpd wrote:Fulvio: I have to wonder why the latest builds of FF will not allow add-ons like IE tab. That really makes no sense to be. In my opinion, allowing add-ons is one of the best reasons for using FF in addtion to its better security. In your opinion, will this "problem" be addressed by the time the final versions come out? I hope so.


For greater security, the new Firefoxes demands that the add-ons be issued by the writer. Apparently, Firefox does not see this too well. I know that the developer of one add-on did everything according to Firefox3.0 request, and did not succeed. So, if some add-ons don't work in Firefox3.0beta5, you can imagine that nothing works in 4.0.
It is up to the add-on developer to figure out the maze. And, in theory add-ons , since they are not part of the code, may introduce unsafe features.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080418 Firefox/2.0.0.14 Flock/1.1.3
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, FF10, SM2.7, TB10, IE8.0, PC Tools Firewall , Avast 6.x, JRE1.7_02
User avatar
Fulvio
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11827
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 10:08 am

Postby iJohnE » Tue 29 Apr, 2008 4:09 pm

Okay, I got it installed. I had to use an older version of IE Tab and run SeaMonkey as an administrator.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9
Desktop: HP-Compaq DC7600: Intel Pentium D 945 @ 3.40GHz, 4GB DDR2 800 RAM, 500GB HDD, 160GB HDD, . nVidia ION ,Windows 7 Ultimate.
Laptop: Dell Studio 1537: Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 @ 2.0Ghz, 4GB DDR2 800 RAM, 320GB HDD, Intel Integrated Mobile 4 Graphics, Windows 7 Ultimate.
User avatar
iJohnE
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 21 Nov, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Pulaski, NY, USA

Postby Fulvio » Wed 30 Apr, 2008 5:25 pm

Which version number worked, and which one did not, in Vista? The developer may want to know.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:2.0a1pre) Gecko/2008042903 Minefield/4.0a1pre
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, FF10, SM2.7, TB10, IE8.0, PC Tools Firewall , Avast 6.x, JRE1.7_02
User avatar
Fulvio
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11827
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 10:08 am

Postby iJohnE » Thu 01 May, 2008 2:15 pm

I could not get the on that was linked on the main page to work. I had to run SM as an administraitor, and this was the only version I could get to work :Version 1.3.2.20070404 — April 4, 2007 — 167 KB. Anything after that didn't seems to have an install script.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9
Desktop: HP-Compaq DC7600: Intel Pentium D 945 @ 3.40GHz, 4GB DDR2 800 RAM, 500GB HDD, 160GB HDD, . nVidia ION ,Windows 7 Ultimate.
Laptop: Dell Studio 1537: Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 @ 2.0Ghz, 4GB DDR2 800 RAM, 320GB HDD, Intel Integrated Mobile 4 Graphics, Windows 7 Ultimate.
User avatar
iJohnE
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 21 Nov, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Pulaski, NY, USA

Postby Fulvio » Thu 01 May, 2008 2:31 pm

John, I have a 1.3.3..., also from last year, installed in my SM1.1.9. Version 1.5.2.., pretty recent is compatible only with Firefox3.0beta. Neither 1.3.3 nor 1.5.2 could be installed in SM2.0a1 builds, even with the aid of Nightly Tester Tools. I don't recall having to do anything special to get the add-on working, in SM1.1.9.
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; America Online Browser 1.1; rev1.5; Windows NT 5.1; Avant Browser; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Last edited by Fulvio on Thu 01 May, 2008 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, FF10, SM2.7, TB10, IE8.0, PC Tools Firewall , Avast 6.x, JRE1.7_02
User avatar
Fulvio
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11827
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 10:08 am

Postby iJohnE » Thu 01 May, 2008 2:36 pm

Well, that is what I had to do for all of my addons, I had to run SM as an admin, or else it would install them in the profile, or say I do not have approriate permissions. Mind you, I am only 14, but either way that still seems a little but of a hassle.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9
Desktop: HP-Compaq DC7600: Intel Pentium D 945 @ 3.40GHz, 4GB DDR2 800 RAM, 500GB HDD, 160GB HDD, . nVidia ION ,Windows 7 Ultimate.
Laptop: Dell Studio 1537: Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 @ 2.0Ghz, 4GB DDR2 800 RAM, 320GB HDD, Intel Integrated Mobile 4 Graphics, Windows 7 Ultimate.
User avatar
iJohnE
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 21 Nov, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Pulaski, NY, USA

Postby Fulvio » Thu 01 May, 2008 5:50 pm

Anything wrong with installing in the profile. I do it all the time with all my programs.
The advantage is that since I have the nightly Tester Tools add-on, I may decide to by-pass the compatibility check, and be able to use the add-on in spite of what the Mozilla people want to do. The newer Firefox and Seamonkey are protecting the user so well that most add-ons are incompatible.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9b5) Gecko/2008032620 Firefox/3.0b5
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, FF10, SM2.7, TB10, IE8.0, PC Tools Firewall , Avast 6.x, JRE1.7_02
User avatar
Fulvio
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11827
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 10:08 am


Return to Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape

Who is online

Registered users: Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]