UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080708 Lightning/0.8 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 ThunderBrowse/3.2.1.8
Thunderbrowse or who needs a browsers?
Moderators: Antony, Edward, profman, Ramona
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Thunderbrowse or who needs a browsers?
by Fulvio » Thu 31 Jul, 2008 10:27 am
Take a look at this addon. Right click/copy and paste is not working for me, but it allows me to browse from my mail client, and open links in it. I may not care for it, but, it sure is intriguing, especially for a minimalist!
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, SM2.9.1, FF12, TB12.0.1, IE8.0, Google Chrome18, Ghostwall , Avast 7.x, JRE1.7_04. Testing FF13b4
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, SM2.9.1, FF12, TB12.0.1, IE8.0, Google Chrome18, Ghostwall , Avast 7.x, JRE1.7_04. Testing FF13b4
-
Fulvio - Moderator
- Posts: 11916
- Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 10:08 am
by Fulvio » Thu 31 Jul, 2008 10:34 am
Maybe the thing is not perfect. In first place, a poll came up. It beats me why. Just ignore it.
In second place, I could not edit nor reply from the message.
And, finally, it seems to have stolen default for the browser
It is cute, but no cigar. Just a curiosity.
In second place, I could not edit nor reply from the message.
And, finally, it seems to have stolen default for the browser
It is cute, but no cigar. Just a curiosity.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1
Last edited by Fulvio on Thu 31 Jul, 2008 10:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, SM2.9.1, FF12, TB12.0.1, IE8.0, Google Chrome18, Ghostwall , Avast 7.x, JRE1.7_04. Testing FF13b4
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, SM2.9.1, FF12, TB12.0.1, IE8.0, Google Chrome18, Ghostwall , Avast 7.x, JRE1.7_04. Testing FF13b4
-
Fulvio - Moderator
- Posts: 11916
- Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 10:08 am
by James » Thu 31 Jul, 2008 10:46 am
Personally, I don't care for it. I like two separate apps: an e-mail client (i.e. Windows Mail or Outlook) and a browser (i.e. Firefox). It's one of the reasons I was so glad to be able to dump the suite and why SeaMonkey has never been an attraction for me. I want them separate. If one goes down, the other stands. An all-in-one idea (and this appears to be heading in that direction) is definitely not a plus for me (with one exception: security. I'm a sucker for security suites... not sure why). So... my bottom line is: Thunderbrowser would be of no interest to me.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1
James
-
James - diamond member
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Sat 13 Jul, 2002 12:10 am
- Location: Pacific NW USA
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape
Who is online
Registered users: Google [Bot]
