SillyDog701

by **ChrisI** » Wed 12 May, 2004 9:31 am

It should also be noted that most development work, especially in the UI, is dedicated to the stand-alone apps Firefox and Thunderbird.

Bug 238300 is a Firefox bug, which has been fixed for almost a month.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040511

by **Antony** » Wed 12 May, 2004 9:40 am

ChrisI wrote:Bug 238300 is a Firefox bug, which has been fixed for almost a month.

Well aware that bug, but not the particular issue which does not comply Apple Human Interface Guidelines I was talking about.

What's that Firefox bug to do with this?

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/124 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.1

by **ChrisI** » Wed 12 May, 2004 9:47 am

Cited by Alice.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040511

by **Antony** » Wed 12 May, 2004 10:00 am

Cited by Alice?
So?

I believe I knew they referred to Firefox.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/124 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.1

by **ChrisI** » Wed 12 May, 2004 10:37 am

Antony wrote:I believe I knew they referred to Firefox.

Good for you.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040511

by **Alice** » Wed 12 May, 2004 12:56 pm

Cited by me only as examples of Apple Human Interface issues.

And I did note Bug 238300 was Resolved-Fixed and indicated so in my post.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421

by **Wellander** » Wed 12 May, 2004 6:10 pm

OFF TOPIC:
Hi,
ChrisI Was a little slow on reporting this.
( I beat him to the punch) Has not happend in a longtime.

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

by **Wellander** » Fri 14 May, 2004 2:09 am

Antony wrote:Thanks Alice,

Last time I check the Human Interface Guideline thing in Bugzilla, few months ago, I did not find the bits I was referring to.

I will make a proper documentation here when I have time. And as I mentioned in my pervious post, I will keep an eye on the credit issue.

Credit issue???
What?????
I do not understand.

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

by **Antony** » Fri 14 May, 2004 2:42 am

Wellander wrote:
Antony wrote:Thanks Alice,

Last time I check the Human Interface Guideline thing in Bugzilla, few months ago, I did not find the bits I was referring to.

I will make a proper documentation here when I have time. And as I mentioned in my pervious post, I will keep an eye on the credit issue.

Credit issue???
What?????
I do not understand.

Wellander,
Read this Mozilla 1.7 RC1 Released thread first, and make sure you read it slowly.

You can see that I was the one reported the problem first. I was the one did all the detailed testing.
Someone who did not believe my reporting (at first, he then called that trouble shooting), refused to acknowledge that documentation was untrue.
Then, he reported it to BugZilla, and got the documentation changed. He got his name listed.
In other words, That guy who firstly did not believe the problem in Documentation, who did almost no verification work in Mac OS X platform, has his name listed as bug reporter :arrow:

he took the Credit.
And my name wasn't mentioned at all.

That's the credit issue.

Credit, as in terms of who did the work.

Life is not fair, the person who did all the hard work received nothing.
The guy who did almost nothing (OR suggested some ridiculous methods) was able to make his name listed.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/124 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.1

SillyDog701

Mozilla 1.4.2 released.

Who is online