by Fulvio » Fri 17 Dec, 2004 9:10 pm
There are quite a few references to Mercurial Comm.+AOL= Netscape development.
Anyone who felt that the development would be done in house, by AOL, must have forgotten what they did with the Netscape people. Mercurial is a good company, and what is AOL trying to do? What was not understood when Netscape6.x came out, i.e. that many webpages written with Front Page, in particular, would not be rendered as they were with IE or IE engine.
As I said earlier, during the beta testing of AOL7.0 Gecko, the majority of the testers were horrified at the idea of having no choice but the gecko-based browser.
And, then there was a large minority which suggested that if the gecko-based browser failed, there would be an option to swith to an IE-based browser. Is it not IE View like it.
You have to face it AOL is a business, and run poorly to boot. What would one expect?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a4) Gecko/20040927
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, FF10, SM2.7, TB10, IE8.0, PC Tools Firewall , Avast 6.x, JRE1.7_02