SillyDog701

[Pu7o]

Antony, how about if you created a [resizeimg] tag? That way, we wouldn't need to resize our screenshots/photos/whatever to fit the forum, we simply would have to use a [resizeimg] instead of an [img].

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.4; Linux) KHTML/3.4.0 (like Gecko)

[Andrew T.]

That is a good idea, but I don't think it would be technologically feasible.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6

[DJGM]

It would be a good idea, apart from the fact that you'd be relying on your browser to resize the images.
In my experience, browsers don't generally do good job of that without making the images look awful!

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-GB; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050717 Firefox/1.0.6

[Antony]

Antony, how about if you created a [resizeimg] tag? That way, we wouldn't need to resize our screenshots/photos/whatever to fit the forum, we simply would have to use a [resizeimg] instead of an [img].

It's a bit complicated.

It is possible for the forum to check the size of image and then apply specified [tt]height[/tt] and [tt]width[/tt] (resized), however, it won't be feasible for SillyDog701 software to check the image every time. Too complicated.

Also, it won't serve much benefit, as the images can still be extremely huge (in filesize), people posting inline images should consider the file size for other users.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/412.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/412.2