UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021119
Web standards issue
Moderators: Antony, Edward, profman, Ramona
22 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
by Shark Daddy » Tue 19 Nov, 2002 7:42 pm
Exactly... and if you serve it as text/html, what's the point?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021118
- Shark Daddy
- Moderator
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 11:19 am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
by Hendikins » Tue 19 Nov, 2002 8:06 pm
...which is EXACTLY what I mean about useragent support
<OT>When am I going to be able to go shark fishing on IRC again?</OT>
<OT>When am I going to be able to go shark fishing on IRC again?</OT>
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021119
-
Hendikins - Lurking Wolfox
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Mon 26 Aug, 2002 5:21 am
- Location: All stations to Zig Zag via the North Shore Line
by Antony » Tue 19 Nov, 2002 9:13 pm
Netscape is the browser that changed the world, not IE, not Opera.
JavaScript is from Netscape, SSL connection is from Netscape as well.
Netscape 6/7 supports better standards then Opera, plus it can also recognise <LAYER> tag if you really want to.
I thought Mr. Tinkles caught the shark last time.
JavaScript is from Netscape, SSL connection is from Netscape as well.
Netscape 6/7 supports better standards then Opera, plus it can also recognise <LAYER> tag if you really want to.
Hendikins wrote:<OT>When am I going to be able to go shark fishing on IRC again?</OT>
I thought Mr. Tinkles caught the shark last time.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 (CK-SillyDog)
-
Antony - diamond member
- Posts: 14510
- Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
by Fulvio » Tue 19 Nov, 2002 10:47 pm
Shark Daddy wrote:None really... and as for browsers, Mozilla and Opera are pretty good. IE 6 isn't bad either.
Something very sensible has been said.
But why such a divergence? Is IE making things worse and worse, or is Netscape choice to be 100% adherent to w3c, when trying to be making a comeback ill-advised, or both?
The majority, out there has, probably never used Netscape, and they are not going to switch if things do not look right.
As for Opera or Netscape, I use both, and many others. IE scares me, though.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows 98; U) Opera 7.0 [en]
A minority may be right, and a majority is always wrong
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, SM2.9.1, FF12, TB12.0.1, IE8.0, Google Chrome18, Ghostwall , Avast 7.x, JRE1.7_04. Testing FF13b4
~ Henrik Ibsen
WinXP, SP3, 512 MB, SM2.9.1, FF12, TB12.0.1, IE8.0, Google Chrome18, Ghostwall , Avast 7.x, JRE1.7_04. Testing FF13b4
-
Fulvio - Moderator
- Posts: 11916
- Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 10:08 am
by Mandrake » Tue 19 Nov, 2002 11:39 pm
Netscape is the browser that changed the world, not IE, not Opera. JavaScript is from Netscape, SSL connection is from Netscape as well. Netscape 6/7 supports better standards then Opera, plus it can also recognise <LAYER> tag if you really want to.
How do you make the <LAYER> tag work on NS6/7?
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.08 [en] (WinNT; I ;Nav)
-
Mandrake - Moderator
- Posts: 4193
- Joined: Fri 13 Sep, 2002 6:35 am
by Antony » Wed 20 Nov, 2002 12:00 am
Easy, all you need to do is simply visit Layer Emulation API for Mozilla and LayerEmu at mozdev.org.Mandrake wrote:How do you make the <LAYER> tag work on NS6/7?
(note, not really recommended for some stupid reason.)
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 (CK-SillyDog)
-
Antony - diamond member
- Posts: 14510
- Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
22 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Return to Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape
Who is online
Registered users: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot]
