Website Problem.

Need technical advice on coding your web pages? Covers HTML, JavaScript, CSS, and some server side technologies. Also the issue of some webpages not displayed well.

Moderator: Don_HH2K

Website Problem.

Postby Wellander » Thu 06 May, 2004 1:37 am

Hi,
Website Problem.
http://www.570klac.com/main.html
gives me this
Parse error: parse error, unexpected T_VARIABLE in /export/home/KLAC-AM/htdocs/_template/configure.template on line 41
What is the problem?
Should I report it tommorrow?
I goto this site on a reguar basis and have never seen this before.
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 98)
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm

Postby Antony » Thu 06 May, 2004 2:26 am

That's their problem on the server side, not the problem of your settings.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/124 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.1
User avatar
Antony
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 14510
Joined: Tue 18 Jun, 2002 11:36 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Wellander » Thu 13 May, 2004 3:48 pm

Hi,
They finally fixed it.
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm

Postby DJGM » Thu 13 May, 2004 4:06 pm

Wellander wrote:Hi,
They finally fixed it.


Are you sure? There's quite literally nowt on that site at all! Going to - View - Page Source . . . gave me this . . .

Code: Select all
<html><body></body></html>


So, have they fixed the earlier mentioned problem, by deleting their site altogether?!?
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4572
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK

Postby Wellander » Thu 13 May, 2004 4:52 pm

Hi,
It views fine for me.
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm

Postby DJGM » Thu 13 May, 2004 5:05 pm

I've checked it on Mozilla (App-Suite 1.6 and Firefox 0.8), Netscape 7.1, MSIE 5.2.3 (Mac), Opera 7.50, and Safari 1.0.
The aformentioned web browsers are all on Mac OS X, and that website appears blank on every single one of them . . .

(I'll check if the site appears on my PC with browsers in Windows and Linux later.)
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4572
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK

Postby djv1 » Thu 13 May, 2004 8:33 pm

It views fine with Firefox 0.8 on Windows XP.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8
Dustin
User avatar
djv1
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 1166
Joined: Wed 14 Jan, 2004 6:02 pm

Postby DJGM » Fri 14 May, 2004 12:23 pm

Having just checked the site in qyestion with Mozilla App-Suite 1.7b on Windows XP, and
finding that the website displays fine, it leaves me asking one rather pertinent question:

Since the site in question is displaying OK on Windows, but not in Mac OS X, are they
taking the totally stupid (and pointless) option of blocking an entire OS platform?

If the answer is "yes" then IMHO, that site simply does not deserve to exist!
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4572
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK

Postby Wellander » Fri 14 May, 2004 3:09 pm

Hi,
I listen to that station.
Also they got hacked my a macintosh user before so Clear Channel (the company that owns that station) is porbably blocking because of that.
It views fine using Mozilla in Linux.
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm

Postby DJGM » Fri 14 May, 2004 3:25 pm

Wellander wrote:. . . they got hacked my a macintosh user before so Clear Channel (the
company that owns that station) is porbably blocking because of that.


If that's the case, then how very petty of that company to do such a thing. IMHO, it's a
totallly pathetic excuse to block an entire OS platform, due to the stupidity of one user.

If this can be confirmed, then I will consider informing Apple via the Safari "Bug" button.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4572
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK

Postby Wellander » Fri 14 May, 2004 4:39 pm

DJGM wrote:
Wellander wrote:. . . they got hacked my a macintosh user before so Clear Channel (the
company that owns that station) is porbably blocking because of that.




If this can be confirmed, then I will consider informing Apple via the Safari "Bug" button.

Hi,
I can not confirm it but I am pretty sure.
UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm

Postby Wellander » Tue 13 Jul, 2004 6:57 pm

Hi,
http://wlbk.net/ What is wrong with this site?
It looks usless.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm

Postby DJGM » Tue 13 Jul, 2004 7:10 pm

Wellander wrote:Hi,
http://wlbk.net/ What is wrong with this site?
It looks useless.


I looked in the Page Source and found the problem . . .

Code: Select all
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml"
xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
xmlns:b="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:publisher"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<meta name=ProgId content=Publisher.Document>
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Publisher 10">
<link rel=File-List href="index_files/filelist.xml">


The boneheads have only used Microsoft Publisher to build their site!
Clearly, this stupid method will only work in IE, and no other browser!

It is quite literally, pathetic!
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616
SeaMonkey = Swiss Army Knife: It's versatile, reliable, and contains useful tools.
Windows Internet Explorer = Old Swiss Cheese: Full of holes, and it stinks!
User avatar
DJGM
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 4572
Joined: Wed 19 Jun, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Manchester, England, UK

Postby Don_HH2K » Tue 13 Jul, 2004 7:27 pm

Microsoft Publisher? That's even worse than FrontPage!
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
User avatar
Don_HH2K
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5112
Joined: Sun 09 May, 2004 3:59 pm

Postby Wellander » Tue 13 Jul, 2004 7:30 pm

Hi,
In Internet Explorer it looks the same.
It seems like there is nothing there.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707
Wellander
diamond member
diamond member
 
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon 21 Oct, 2002 6:37 pm


Return to Web Design and Page Coding

Who is online

Registered users: Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]