The use of technology used to imply reading and writing ability. When I was three, "using a computer" meant opening a Lotus SmartSuite app and doing something productive, or if you were adventurous, using a terminal emulator to get out to the Internet. Those were things you couldn't do without the ability to read.
That's a stark contrast to now, when kids nine and younger have the options of watching YouTube videos, making MySpace profiles, and playing early-childhood games with voice and symbols rather than text, all without much of a need for literacy.
Moving to ban computers for the under-ten crowd seems extreme, though, especially since the computer can be an effective learning tool if used properly. The problem is that no education market is interested in policing computer users. I learned to type on an Apple II in elementary school,
before I was nine, which was advantageous since motor skills are generally best learned early.
I was recently informed that the high school I attended banned the use of laptops school-wide (it used to be at the instructor's discretion), citing decreased attention levels as the cause. Personally I think it's a massive step backwards, and caters to the lowest common denominator (the ones that can't focus) while shutting out those that can actually make use of technology in the classroom.
It's interesting that twenty years ago, big names like IBM and MECC figured out that the computer could be used to teach reading and writing (IBM even had an app called "Writing to Read" for the PCjr dedicated to that), yet now people say that it only hinders the development of those skills.
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; en-US; rv:1.9.3a5pre) Gecko/20100514 Minefield/3.7a5pre
Laptop: HP Compaq nx6325 - Turion 64 X2 @ 2GHz, 2GB DDR2, 100GB HD, ATI Radeon X300, 15" LCD, Seven Pro
Handheld: Palm Treo 650 - Intel PXA270 @ 312MHz, 10MB RAM, 32MB flash, 2.7" LCD, Palm OS 5.4